Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for assessing and nurturing young children‘s thinking in probability

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a synthesis of the literature and observations of young children over two years, a framework for assessing probabilistic thinking was formulated, refined and validated. The major constructs incorporated in this framework were sample space, probability of an event, probability comparisons, and conditional probability. For each of these constructs, four levels of thinking, which reflected a continuum from subjective to numerical reasoning, were established. At each level, and across all four constructs, learning descriptors were developed and used to generate probability tasks. The framework was validated through data obtained from eight grade three children who served as case studies. The thinking of these children was assessed at three points over a school year and analyzed using the problem tasks in interview settings. The results suggest that although the framework produced a coherent picture of children‘s thinking in probability, there was ‘static’ in the system which generated inconsistencies within levels of thinking. These inconsistencies were more pronounced following instruction. The levels of thinking in the framework appear to be in agreement with levels of cognitive functioning postulated by Neo-Piagetian theorists and provide a theoretical foundation for designers of curriculum and assessment programs in elementary school probability. Further studies are needed to investigate whether the framework is appropriate for children from other cultural and linguistic backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Acredolo, C., O'Connor, J., Banks, L., and Horobin, K.: 1989, ‘Children's ability to make probability estimates: Skills revealed through application of Anderson's functional measurement methodology’, Child Development 60, 933–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F.: 1991, ‘Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behavior’, in H. A. H. Rowe (ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualization and Measurement, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M. G. and Bentz, H. J.: 1991, ‘Empirical research in understanding probability’: in R. Kapadia and M. Borovcnik (eds.), Chance Encounters: Probability in Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R.: 1985, Cognitive Development, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Hansel, M.: 1956, Risk and Gambling, Philosophical Library, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office.: 1991, National Curriculum: Mathematics for Ages 5 to 16. Central Office of Information, York, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D.: 1993, ‘Children's strategies for solving two-and three-stage combinatorial problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24(3), 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R.: 1983, ‘Children's choice behaviour in probabilistic situations’, in: D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, and G. M. Constable (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Volume II, University of Sheffield, England, pp. 714–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R.: 1988, ‘Conditional probabilities: Insights and difficulties’, in: R. Davidson and J. Swift (eds.), Proceedings: The Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., pp. 292–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P. and Peterson, P. L.: 1989, ‘Learning Mathematics with Understanding,’ in: J. Brophy (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume I, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., Marino, M. S.: 1991, ‘Factors affecting probabilistic judgments in children in adolescence’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22(6), 523–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. R.: 1982, ‘A survey of probability concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11–16 years’, in: D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett and G. M. Constable (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Volume II, University of Sheffield, U.K., pp. 766–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. and Kapadia, R.: 1984, ‘Children's conceptions of probability: A psychological and pedagogical review’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A.: 1974, ‘The performance of first, second, and third grade children on five concepts of probability and the effects of grade, IQ, and embodiments on their performances’, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

  • Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W. and Mogill, A. T.: submitted, ‘Using children's probabilistic thinking in instruction,’ The Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

  • Jones, G. A. and Thornton, C. A.: 1992, Data, Chance & Probability: Grades 1-3 Activity Book. Learning Resources, Lincolnshire, IL., pp. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Putt, I. J., Hill, K. M., Mogill, A. T., Rich, B. S. and Van Zoest, L. R.: 1996, ‘Mulitdigit number sense: A framework for instruction and assessment,’ Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C.: 1989, ‘An outbreak of belief in independence’, in C. Maher, G. Goldin and B. Davis (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 2, Rutgers University Press, Rutgers, NJ, pp. 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M.: 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.: 1989, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, The Council, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J.: 1979, ‘Discrepant results in experimental studies of young children's understanding of probability’, Child Development 50, 1121–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1975, The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children (translated by L. Leake, Jr., P. Burrell and H. D. Fischbein), W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, T. L.: 1988, ‘Elementary school children's use of strategy in playing microcomputer probability games’, in R. Davidson and J. Swift (eds.), Proceedings: The Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., pp. 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M.: 1992, ‘Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions’, in D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 465–494.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, G.A., Langrall, C.W., Thornton, C.A. et al. A framework for assessing and nurturing young children‘s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics 32, 101–125 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002981520728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002981520728

Keywords

Navigation