Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of grain yield and other agronomic characters in t'ef (Eragrostis tef Zucc Trotter). II. The triple test cross

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The normal and selfed families of the triple test cross were employed to detect gene action in t'ef for grain yield and other useful agronomic characters in the breeding programme. Cultivars Kay Murri and Fesho were used as L1 and L2 testers, respectively. Eight randomly selected cultivars and two released varieties (DZ-01-354 and DZ-01-196) were crossed with the testers L1, L2 and L3 (the F1 of L1 × L2). In the case of the selfed families, 14 cultivars and two released varieties were used for crossing with the testers. The normal families were grown on an Inceptisol developed from volcanic ash whilst the selfed families were grown on a pellic Vertisol at the Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Centre, Ethiopia. The rainfall during the experimental season was 463 mm. Epistasis was detected for grain yield, yield per panicle, panicle weight, plant weight, harvest index, tiller number, panicle length, culm diameter, days to heading and days to maturity in the normal families of the triple test cross (TTC) of t'ef. Similarly the characters grain yield, yield per panicle, panicle weight, plant height, panicle length, days to heading and days to maturity showed epistasis in the selfed families of the TTC. Epistatic interaction was not important for shoot biomass and for harvest index (for the transformed data) in this family. Therefore, both the normal and selfed families of the TTC were in agreement with regard to detecting epistasis for grain yield, yield per panicle, panicle weight, panicle length, days to heading and days to maturity. Significant additive (D) and dominance (H) components were estimated for the characters in both families, although the magnitudes might have been inflated due to epistasis. The dominance component for panicle length was unimportant in both families of the TTC and as a result the additive components were not biased. In general, the additive, dominance and epistatic components were important in t'ef. Since the crop is self-fertilized only the additive and additive × additive terms are important to develop pure breeding varieties. Therefore, selection for superior segregants should start in advanced generations as homozygosity increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ebba, T., 1975. T'ef (Eragrostis tef) cultivars. Morphology and classification. Part II, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 66, Addis Ababa University, College of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L. & J.M. Perkins, 1970. A general method for the detection of additive, dominance and epistatic components of variation. III. F2 and backcross populations. Heredity 25: 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L., J.M. Perkins & E.L. Breese, 1969. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. II. Application to inbred lines. Heredity 24: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M.J. and J.L. Jinks, 1968. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403–409.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ketata, H., E.L. Smith, L.H. Edwards & R.W. McNew, 1976. Detection of epistatic, additive and dominance variation in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Crop Sci 16: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. & J.L. Jinks, 1982. Biometrical Genetics. Third Edition. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, G.S., G. Singh & K. Chand, 1989. Detection of components of genetic variation and prediction of the frequencies of transgressive segregants in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Genet Breed 44: 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooni, H.S., J.L. Jinks & G.S. Pooni, 1980. A general method for the detection and estimation of additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. IV. Triple test cross analysis for normal families and their selfs. Heredity 44: 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. & R.B. Singh, 1976. Triple test cross analysis in two wheat crosses. Heredity 37: 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbaraman, N. & S.R.S. Rangasamy, 1989. Triple test cross analysis in rice. Euphytica 42: 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tefera, H. & W.E. Peat, 1997. Genetics of grain yield and other agronomic characters in t'ef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter). I. Generation means and variances analysis (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tefera, H., Peat, W. Genetics of grain yield and other agronomic characters in t'ef (Eragrostis tef Zucc Trotter). II. The triple test cross. Euphytica 96, 193–202 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002949028094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002949028094

Navigation