Abstract
This paper examines a range of positive and negative consequences for women of Quality Assurance (QA) initiatives in one Australian university. Drawing on Foucault‘s concepts of ’governmentality‘ and ’power/knowledge‘, it is argued that the popular ’repressive hypothesis‘ of power via governmentality hides a positive and potentially productive dimension of power. Following recent work by feminist political theorists, my claim here is that a corporatist managerial discourse such as QA can be used strategically for a politics of transformation in the interests of women. The paper begins with an outline of the parameters of debate about and critiques of the QA agenda in the Australian higher education sector, and highlights some potentially negative consequences for women in terms of their structural location in the university. An overview of QA audit processes then leads into a closer examination of one university‘s response to QA initiatives. The culture and management style of this regional university was significantly transformed from an informal and pastoral model to one with open systems of accountability and performance targets built around equity issues. In that regard, it is argued, equity target groups including women, became the visible focus of the development and implementation of new systems designed to bring equity into the mainstream. In closing, I argue that in this particular university, the new managerialism of QA was indeed a panoptic mechanism of ’making visible‘: productivity, equity groups, procedures and outcomes. But in an institutional context where open systems were lacking and women‘s contributions invisible and undervalued, the QA agenda brought new opportunities not only for women but for other groups previously marginalised and silenced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, S. (1994). Gendered Thought: Sociological Reflections On Women, Teaching And Feminism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Allen, F. (1994a). Academic Women in Australian Universities. Affirmative Action Agency-Monograph #4. Canberra, ACT: AGPS.
Allen, F. (1994b). 'Academic women in Australia: Progress real or imagined?' in S. Lie, L. Malik and D. Harris (eds), The Gender Gap In Higher Education. London: Kopan Page.
Allen, M. (1994). 'Casualisation and women workers in higher education', NTEU Frontline 1(1), 13.
Bacchi, C. (1993). 'The brick wall: Why so few women become senior academics', Australian Universities' Review36(1), 36–41.
Baker, D. and Fogarty, M. (eds) (1993). A Gendered Culture: Educational Management In The Nineties. St. Albans, Australia: Victoria University of Technology Pres
Bowen, M. (1994). 'Mainstreaming equity activities in universities: The next challenge', Australian Universities' Review27(2), 19–23.
Castleman, T., Allen, M., Bastalich, W. and Wright, P. (1995). Limited Access: Women's Disadvantage In Higher Education Employment. Melbourne: National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU)
Cockburn, C. (1990). In The Way Of Women: Men's Resistance To Sex Equality In Organisations. London: Macmillan. Committee on Quality Assurance in Higher Education (1995). Report on 1994Quality Reviews, Vols 1 & 2. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Davies, S., Lubelska, C., and Quinn, J. (eds) (1994). Changing the Subject: Women In Higher Education. Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Gender Shock: Practising Feminism On Two Continents. Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1979b). 'Governmentability', Ideology And Consciousness 6, 5–22.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977(C. Gordon, ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham and K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books
Foucault, M. (1983). ‘Afterword: The subject and power’, in H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism And Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–226
Foucault, M. (1988). ‘The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom’, in J. Bernauer and D. Rasmussen (eds), The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, pp. 1–20
Foucault, M. (1989).Foucault Live: Interviews, 1966–84(S. Lotringer, ed.; J. Johnston, Trans.)
LatherP.1991.GettingSmartFeministResearchAndPedagogyWith/InThePostmodern.NewYorkRoutledge.'LeviathanRe-engineered'1996.TheEcomist341FeminismsandEducation. Buckingham, UK: Open University Pres
Wells, J. (1994). 'Senate inquiry into research: What's in it for women?' NTEU Frontline1(1), 15–16.
Wells, J. (1995). 'Performance indicators in higher education: Government policy and its implications for female staff', NTEU Frontline3(1), 9–11.
Wieneke, C. (1988). 'Room at the top? An analysis of the position of senior women in college administration in New South Wales', Journal of Tertiary Education Administration10(1), 5–13.
Wieneke, C. (1991). 'Through the glass ceiling slowly: Senior administrative women in higher education', Australian Feminist Studies13, 41–58.
Wieneke, C. and Durham, M. (1992). 'Regulating the equality agenda: Equal employment opportunity in higher education', Australian Universities' Review35(2), 30–35.
Yeatman, A. (1990). Bureaucrats, Technocrats, Femocrats. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Yeatman, A. (1994a). Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York: Routledge.
Yeatman, A. (1994a). Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York: Routledge
Yeatman, A. (1994b). ‘Women and the state’, in K. Pritchard-Hughes (ed), Contemporary Australian feminism. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, pp. 177–197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luke, C. Quality assurance and women in higher education. Higher Education 33, 433–451 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002905428032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002905428032