Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 195–212 | Cite as

Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography

  • Graham Webb
Article

Abstract

The notion of 'deep' and 'surface' approaches to learning is critiquedalong with phenomenography, the associated methodology and theory ofknowledge. A number of reasons are suggested to explain why the deep/surfacenotion has attained what is tantamount to foundational status within highereducation research, practice and development. These include its ability toboth cohere with the past while at the same time enabling a new generation ofresearchers to rise within the discourse; the contemporaneous growth ofeducational development centres and staff developers within higher educationinstitutions; the simplicity, universality and power of the metaphor.

Some elements of a critique of phenomenography are suggested followingboth postmodern and philosophy of science objections regarding theobservational and interpretive neutrality of the researcher. These point tothe importance of the understandings of researchers in the construction ofresults. It is also suggested that the 'qualitative' nat ure of the researchis undeveloped and does not exhibit the hermeneutical values usuallyassociated with 'human' as opposed to positivist science.

The idea of deconstruction is then introduced and the deep/surfacemetaphor discussed in terms of the post-structural critique of binaries.Finally, the question of power within the higher education developmentdiscourse is raised.

Keywords

High Education Science Objection Development Centre Positivist Science Foundational Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and Texts: A Political Economy of Class and Gender Relations in Education. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M.B., Frost, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1- Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
  4. Cherryholmes, C.H. (1988). Power and Criticism. Poststructural Investigations in Education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  5. Dahlgren, L.-O. (1984). 'Outcomes of learning', in F. Marton, D. Hounsell and N. Entwistle (ed.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
  6. Dahlgren, L.-O. and Marton, F. (1978). 'Students' conceptions of subject matter: an aspect of learning and teaching in higher education', Studies in Higher Education 3: 25–35.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and Phenomena. And Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Entwistle, N. (1984). 'Contrasting perspectives on learning', in F. Marton, D. Hounsell and N. Entwistle (eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, J. and Straub, K. (1992). Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison.New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Gagné, R.M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning. Second Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. and Habeshaw, T. (1987). 53 Interesting Things to do in your Lectures. Avon, UK: Technical and Educational Services.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marton, F. (1981). 'Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us', Instructional Science 10: 177–200.Google Scholar
  16. Marton, F. (1986). 'Phenomenography-A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality', Journal of Thought 21(3): 28–49.Google Scholar
  17. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. and Lai, K.T. (1993). 'The paradox of the Chinese Learner', Educational Research and Development Unit (RMIT) Occasional Paper 93.1: 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (eds.) (1984). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). 'On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process', British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.Google Scholar
  20. Morss, J. (1990). The Biologising of Childhood: Developmental Psychology and the Darwinian Myth. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Norris, C. (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  22. Pask, G. and Scott, B.C.E. (1972). 'Learning strategies and individual competence', International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 4: 217–239 & 242-253.Google Scholar
  23. Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ryan, M. (1982) Marxism and Deconstruction. A Critical Articulation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Säljö, R. (1988). 'Learning in educational settings: methods of inquiry', in P. Ramsden (ed.), Improving Learning. New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page, pp. 32–48.Google Scholar
  26. Sarup, M. (1989). An Introductory Guide to Post-structuralism and Postmodernism. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  27. Seung, T.K. (1982). Structuralism and Hermeneutics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, G. (1993). 'A theory of practice: hermeneutical understanding', Higher Education Research and Development 12(1): 59–72.Google Scholar
  29. Webb, G. (1992). 'On pretexts for higher education development activities', Higher Education 24(3): 351–361.Google Scholar
  30. Webb, G. (1996). Understanding Staff Development. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Witkin, H.A. (1975). 'Some implications of research on cognitive style for problems of education', in J.M. Whitehead (ed.) Personality and Learning 1. Milton Keynes: Hodder and Stoughton in association with the Open University Press}, pp. 288–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Webb
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher Education Development CentreUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations