Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 301–310 | Cite as

Depersonalization, Self-Esteem and Body Image in Male-to-Female Transsexuals Compared to Male and Female Controls

  • Uwe Wolfradt
  • Kerstin Neumann


Whether postoperative male-to-female transsexuals differ in regard to measures of self- and body image from a nontranssexual control group was investigated. A group of 30 postoperative male-to-female transsexuals and control groups of 30 males and 30 females completed self-report measures (depersonalization, self-esteem, gender identity traits, body image). Results showed that transsexuals and males scored higher on self-esteem and dynamic body image than the females did. No differences between the groups were found in terms of depersonalization and satisfaction. Transsexuals and females described themselves as more feminine than males. Regarding sex-role orientation, more androgynous subjects were found among transsexuals than in the control groups. General satisfaction is associated with feminine and masculine traits in transsexuals. Results are discussed in context of the function of these personality features for the identity development of male-to-female transsexuals.

depersonalization body image self-esteem male-to-female transsexuals gender identity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altstötter-Gleich, C. (1989). Theoriegeleitete Itemkonstruktion und-auswahl: Eine Modifikation des Einsatzes der Repertory-Grid-Technik dargestellt am Beispiel der Erfassung der Geschlechtsidentit ät [Theory oriented item construction and selection: A modification of the use of the Repertory-Grid-Technique as shown at the exemple of the assessment of gender identity], Verlag für empirische Pädagogik, Landau.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., and Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34: 1016-1023.Google Scholar
  4. Brems, C., Adams, R. L., and Skillman, G. D. (1993). Person drawing by transsexual clients, psychiatric clients, and nonclients compared: Indicators of sex-typing and pathology. Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 253-264.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, G. R., Wise, T. N., Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., and Fagan, P. J. (1996). Personality characteristics and sexual functioning of 188 cross-dressing men. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 184: 265-273.Google Scholar
  6. Buhrich, N. (1981). Psychological adjustment in transvestism and transsexualism. Behav. Res. Ther. 19: 407-411.Google Scholar
  7. Clement, U., and Loewe, B. (1996). Die Validierung des FKB-20 als Instrument zur Erfassung von Körperbildstörungen bei psychosomatischen Patienten [The validation of the Body-Image-Questionnaire (BIQ): A German-language instrument for assessing body image disturbances in patients with psychsomatic disorders]. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 46: 254-259.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, L., Ruiter, C., de, Ringelberg, H., and Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (1997). Psychological functioning of adolescent transsexuals: Personality and psychopathology. J. Clin. Psychol. 53: 187-196.Google Scholar
  9. Coons, P. M. (1992). Dissociative disorder not otherwise specified: A clinical investigation of 50 cases with suggestions for typology and treatment. Dissociation 5: 187-195.Google Scholar
  10. Devor, H. (1994). Transsexualism, dissociaton, and child abuse: An initial discussion based on nonclinical data. J. Psychol. Hum. Sex. 6: 49-72.Google Scholar
  11. Feingold, A., and Mazzella, R. (1998). Gender differences in body image are increasing. Psychol. Sci. 9: 190-195.Google Scholar
  12. Ferring, D., and Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zu Reliabilität, Validität und Stabilität der Rosenberg-Skala [Measurement of self-esteem: Findings on reliability, validity, and stability of the Rosenberg Scale]. Diagnostica 42: 284-292.Google Scholar
  13. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, U., Becker, H., and Rueffer-Hesse, C. (1997). Self and gender: Narcissistic pathology and personality factors in gender dysphoric patients. Preliminary results of a prospective study. Int. J. Transg. 1: Scholar
  15. Johnson, S. L., and Hunt, D. D. (1990). The relationship of male transsexual typology to psychological adjustment. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 349-360.Google Scholar
  16. Lief, H. I., and Hubschman, L. (1993). Orgasm and postoperative transsexual. Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 145-155.Google Scholar
  17. Loewenthal, K. L. (1996). An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales, UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Lothstein, L. M. (1984). Psychological testing with transsexuals: A 30-year review. J. Pers. Ass. 48: 500-507.Google Scholar
  19. Ludwig, M. R., and Brownell, K. D. (1999). Lesbians, bisexual women, and body image: An investigation of gender roles and social group affiliation. Int. J. Eat. Dis. 25: 89-97.Google Scholar
  20. Lutz, D. J., Roback, H. B., and Hart, M. (1984). Feminine gender identity and psychological adjustment of male transsexuals and male homosexuals. J. Sex Res. 20: 350-362.Google Scholar
  21. Marone, P., Iacoella, S., Cecchini, M. G., and Ravenna, A. R. (1998). An experimental study of body image and perception in gender identity disorders. Int. J. Trans. 2: http://www.symposion. com/ijt/ijtc0501.htm.Google Scholar
  22. Midence, K., and Hargreaves, I. (1997). Psychological adjustment in male-to-female transsexuals: An overview of research evidence. J. Psychol. 131: 602-614.Google Scholar
  23. Muth, J. L., and Cash, T. F. (1997). Body image attitudes: What difference does gender make? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27: 1438-1452.Google Scholar
  24. Neumann, K., and Berghaus, A. (1996). Raising the medium speaking voice pitch by surgical means in male-female transsexuals. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 253: 75.Google Scholar
  25. Pfäfflin, F. (1993). Transsexualität: Beiträge zur Psychopathologie, Psychodynamik und zum Verlauf [Transsexuality: Contributions to psychopathology, psychodynamics and to course], Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  26. Ramanaiah, N. V., Detwiler, F. R., and Byravan, A. (1995). Sex-role orientation and satisfaction with life. Psychol. Rep. 77: 1260-1262.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  28. Saks, B. R. (1998). Transgenderism and Dissociative Identity Disorder-A case study. Int J. Trans. 2: Scholar
  29. Schwartz, P. G. (1988). A case of concurrent multiple personality disorder and transsexualism. Dissociation 1: 48-51.Google Scholar
  30. Steinberg, M. (1991). The spectrum of depersonalization: Assessment and treatment. In Tasman, A., and Goldfinger, S. M. (eds.), Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 10, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp. 223-247.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, M. C., and Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychol. Bull. 92: 347-366.Google Scholar
  32. Walling, D. P., Goodwin, J. M., and Cole, C. M. (1998). Dissociation in a transsexual population. J. Sex. Edu. Thera. 23: 121-123.Google Scholar
  33. Wolfradt, U. (1998). The Scale of Depersonalization Experiences, Unpublished Manuscript, University Halle, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. Wolfradt, U., and Engelmann, S. (1999). Depersonalization, fantasies and coping behavior in clinical context. J. Clin. Psychol. 55: 225-232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uwe Wolfradt
    • 1
  • Kerstin Neumann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMartin-Luther-University HalleGermany
  2. 2.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryMartin-Luther-University HalleGermany

Personalised recommendations