Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 101–118 | Cite as

Searching for Sexually Explicit Materials on the Internet: An Exploratory Study of College Students' Behavior and Attitudes

  • Patricia Goodson
  • Deborah McCormick
  • Alexandra Evans
Article

Abstract

The convergence of sexuality messages with a computerized medium (specifically, the Internet) represents an unprecedented phenomenon with, as of yet, unknown outcomes. Despite the Internet's widespread use, little is known about users' behaviors and attitudes when searching for sexually explicit materials online. This study examined specific behaviors and outcome expectations and expectancies (or attitudes) of a sample of 506 undergraduate students at a public university in Texas. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire, designed and pretested by the authors. Main results revealed that most students in the sample were infrequent and relatively new users of the Internet. Forty-three percent (43.5%) of students had sometime accessed sexually explicit materials through the Internet, but the practice was not very common. Only 2.9% said they accessed these materials “frequently.” Male students were significantly more likely to have accessed the Internet for viewing sexually explicit materials and to claim curiosity about sex as their motivation for this behavior. Women were significantly more likely to have experienced sexual harassment while online. In terms of attitudes, this sample did not appear to value highly or exhibit strong beliefs about the potential outcomes associated with accessing the Internet for sexually explicit materials. Competing explanations as well as the limitations of this study are discussed.

Internet erotica attitudes behavior undergraduates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Acevedo, E., Delgado, G., and Segil, E. (1998). INPPARES uses Internet to provide Peruvians with sexuality information and counseling. SIECUS Rep. 26: 14.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Khaldi, M. A., and Al-Jabri, I. M. (1998). The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 14: 23-42.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, M., D'Alessio, D., and Brezgel, K. (1995a). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II: Aggression after exposure. Human Comm. Res. 22: 258-283.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, M., Emmers, T., Gebhardt, L., and Giery, M. A. (1995b). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. J. Comm. 45: 5-26.Google Scholar
  5. Ballard, S. M., and Morris, M. L. (1998). Sources of sexuality information for university students. JSET 23: 278-287.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Barak, A., and Fisher, W. A. (1997). Effects of interactive computer erotica on men's attitudes and behavior toward women: An experimental study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 13: 353-369.Google Scholar
  9. Baranowski, T., Perry, C. L., and Parcel, G. S. (1997). How individuals, environments and health behavior interact. In Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M., and Rimer, B. K. (eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, J., and Stein, R. M. (1991). Is sexual erotica associated with sexual deviance in adolescent males? Int. J. Law Psychiatry 14: 85-95.Google Scholar
  11. Binik, Y. M., Mah, K., and Kiesler, S. (1999). Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the Internet. J. Sex Res. 36: 82-90.Google Scholar
  12. Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychol. Rep. 80: 879-882.Google Scholar
  13. Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D., eds. (1994). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Carey, R. (1996). Betwixt and between: An organization's relationship with online communications. SIECUS Rep. 25: 8-9.Google Scholar
  15. Cart, C. U. (1997). Online computer networks: Potential and challenges for community organizing and community building now and in the future. In Minkler, M. (ed.), Community Organizing & Community Building for Health, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  16. Commerce Net. (1999). CommerceNet and Nielsen Media Research issue results of Spring 1999 Internet Demographic Survey. Available: http://www.commercenet.com.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. Cyberpsych. Behav. 1: 181-187.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., and Gordon, B. L. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Prof. Psycho. 30: 154-164.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, A., and Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. JSET 22: 7-14.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, S. F., Smith, B. G., Rodrigue, K., and Pulvers, K. (1999). An examination of Internet usage on two college campuses. Coll. Stud. J. 3: 257-260.Google Scholar
  21. DeGuzman, M. A., and Ross, M. W. (1999). Assessing the application of HIV and AIDS related education and counseling on the Internet. Patient Educ. Couns. 36: 209-228.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, W. A., and Barak, A. (1991). Pornography, erotica, and behavior: More questions than answers.Int. J. Law Psychiatry 14: 65-83.Google Scholar
  23. Goodson, P., McCormick, D., and Evans, A. (2000). Sex and the Internet: A survey instrument to assess college students' behavior and attitudes. CyberPsych. Behav. 3(2): 129-149.Google Scholar
  24. Haffner, D. W., and Kelly, M. (1987). Adolescent Sexuality in the Media. SIECUS Rep. March/April: 9-12.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, R. J. (1994). The impact of sexually explicit media. In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  26. Henry, S. (1999, August 26). Health officials get web help; Gay site brings syphillis warning to California men at risk. The Washington Post, p. E08.Google Scholar
  27. Koch, P. B. (1998). Sexual knowledge and education. In Francouer, R. T., Koch, P. B., and Weis, D. L. (eds.), Sexuality in America: Understanding our sexual values and behavior. New York, Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. Koop, C. E. (1987). Report of the Surgeon General's workshop on pornography and public health. Am. Psychol. 42: 944-945.Google Scholar
  29. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., and Scherlis,W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am. Psychol. 53: 1017-1031.Google Scholar
  30. Kutchinsky, B. (1991). Pornography and rape: Theory and practice? Evidence from crime data in four countries where pornography is easily available. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 14: 47-64.Google Scholar
  31. Li, Q., and Davey, M. R. (1996). Pornography as a source of sex information for college students in fraternities and sororities. J. Health Ed. 27: 165-169.Google Scholar
  32. Newburger, E.C. (1999). Computer use in the United States. October 1997. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, Pages 1-11. Available: http://www.census.gov.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, B. (1997). The use of online services to encourage exploration of ego-dystonic sexual interests. JSET 22: 45-48.Google Scholar
  34. Oliver, M. B., and Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 114: 29-51.Google Scholar
  35. Parks, M. R., and Floyd, K. (1999). Making friends in Cyberspace. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 1: 1-12.Google Scholar
  36. Parks, M. R., and Roberts, L. D. (1998). ‘Making MOOsic’: The development of personal relationships online and a comparison to their offline counterparts. J. Social Pers. Rel. 15: 517-537.Google Scholar
  37. Portelli, C. J., and Meade, C. W. (1998). Censorship and the Internet: No easy answers. SIECUS Rep. 27: 4-8.Google Scholar
  38. Roffman, D. M., Shannon, D., and Dwyer, C. (1997). Adolescents, sexual health and the Internet: Possibilities, prospects, and challenges for educators. JSET 22: 49-55.Google Scholar
  39. Ross, M. W., Tikkanen, R., and Mansson, S. A. (2000). Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: Implications for research and HIV interventions. Soc. Sci. Med. 47.Google Scholar
  40. Scheerhorn, D., Warisse, J., and McNeilis, K. S. (1995). Computer-based telecommunication among an illness-related community: Design, delivery, early use, and the functions of HIGHnet. Health Commun. 7: 301-325.Google Scholar
  41. Scherer, K. (1997). College life online: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. J. Col. Stud. Devel. 38: 655-665.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, J. E. (1991). What is obscene? Social science and the contemporary community standard test of obscenity. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 14: 29-45.Google Scholar
  43. Searchterms.com. (1999). The Top Ten. Available: http://www.searchterms.com/index/html.Google Scholar
  44. Tamosaitis, N. (1995). Net.Sex, Ziff-Davis Press, Emeryville, CA.Google Scholar
  45. Walsh, A. (1999). Life history theory and female readers of pornography. Pers. Indiv. Dif. 27: 779-787.Google Scholar
  46. Weinrich, J. D. (1997). Strange bedfellows: Homosexuality, gay liberation, and the Internet.JSET 22: 58-66.Google Scholar
  47. Winick, C., and Evans, J. T. (1994). Is there a national standard with respect to attitudes toward sexually explicit media material? Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 405-419.Google Scholar
  48. Zillmann, D., and Bryant, J. (1988). Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography on family values. J. Fam. Issues 9: 518-544.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Goodson
    • 1
  • Deborah McCormick
    • 2
  • Alexandra Evans
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health and Kinesiology, College StationTexas A&M UniversityTexas
  2. 2.Department of Health Promotion and Exercise ScienceNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaff
  3. 3.School of Public HealthThe University of TexasHouston

Personalised recommendations