Skip to main content
Log in

Cohomology of Compact Locally Symmetric Spaces

  • Published:
Compositio Mathematica

Abstract

We obtain a necessary condition for a cohomology class on a compact locally symmetric space S(Γ)=Γ∖X (a quotient of a symmetric space X of the non-compact type by a cocompact arithmetic subgroup Γ of isometries of X) to restrict non-trivially to a compact locally symmetric subspace S H(Γ)=Δ∖Y of Γ∖X. The restriction is in a 'virtual' sense, i.e. it is the restriction of possibly a translate of the cohomology class under a Hecke correspondence. As a consequence we deduce that when X and Y are the unit balls in ℂn and ℂm, then low degree cohomology classes on the variety S(Γ) restrict non-trivially to the subvariety S H (Γ); this proves a conjecture of M. Harris and J-S. Li. We also deduce the non-vanishing of cup-products of cohomology classes for the variety S(Γ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arthur, J.: Unipotent automorphic representations, conjectures, Astèrisque 171–172(1989), 13–71 Soc Math. France

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baily, W. and Borel, A.: Compacti¢cations of arithmetic quotients of bounded sym-metric domains, Ann. Math. 84 (1966), 442–528.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borel, A. and Wallach, N.: Continuous Cohomology, Discrete Subgroups, and Representations of Reductive Groups, Ann. Math. Stud., Princeton Univ. Press, 1980.

  4. Clozel, L.: Produits dans la cohomologie, J. Reine Angew. Math., 430 (1992), 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clozel, L.: Produits dans la cohomologie II, J. Reine Angew.Math. 444 (1993), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clozel, L.: Motifs et formes automorphes, applications de functorialité, In: Auto-morphic Forms, Shimura Varieties and L-functions, Perspect. Math. Vol (I), Academic Press, New York.

  7. Clozel, L. and Venkataramana, T. N.: Restriction of holomorphic cohomology of a Shimura variety to a smaller Shimura variety, Duke J. Math. 95(1) (1998), 51–106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deligne, P.: Variétés de Shimura, interprétation modulaire, Proc. Sympos. PureMath. 33(2) (1979), 247–290.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fulton, W. and Harris, J.: Representation Theory, Springer, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths, P. and Harris, J.: Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Pure Appl. Math., Wiley, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helgason, S.: Differential Geometry and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, M. and Li, J-S.: A Lefschetz property for subvarieties of Shimura varieties, J. Algebraic Geom., 1998.

  13. Kostant, B.: Lie Algebra cohomology and generalised Schubert cells, Ann. Math. 77(1) (1963), 72–144.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kudla, S. S.: Algebraic cycles of Shimura varieties of orthogonal type, Duke Math. J. 86(1) (1997), 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumaresan, S.: The canonical k-types of irreducible (g,K)-modules with non-zero cohomology, Invent Math. 59 (1980), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mostow, G. D.: Self adjoint groups, Ann. Math. 62 (1955), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar Murthy, V. and Ramakrishnan, D.: The Albanese of unitary Shimura varieties, In: Langlands and Ramakrishnan (eds), Zeta Functions of Picard Modular Surfaces, Publ. CRM, Montreal, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oda, T.: A note on the Albanese of certain unitary Shimura varieties J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Section 1A, Math. 28 (1981), 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parthasarathy, R.: Criteria for the unitarisability of certain highest weight modules, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 89 (1980), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parthasarathy, R.: Holomorphic forms on г\G/K and Chern classes, Topology 21 (1982), 152–175.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Platonov, V. P.: Strong approximation in algebraic groups and the Kneser Tits con-jecture, Dokl Akad. Nauk BSSR 13(7) (1969), 585–587.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prasad, G.: Strong approximation for demisimple groups over function fields, Ann. Math. 105(3) (1977), 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raghunathan, M. S.: Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups, Ergeb. Math., Springer, Berlin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Serre, J.-P.: Geomètrie algébrique et geométrie analitique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6 (1956), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shimura, G.: Unitary groups and theta functions, In: Proc. Int. Sympos. Algebra and N. Theory, (Kyoto, 1976), pp. 195–200.

  26. Shimura, G.: Arithmetic of automorphic forms with respect to a unitary group, Ann Math. 2 107(3) (1978), 563–605.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shimura, G.: Automorphic forms and periods of Abelian varieties, J. Math. Soc. Japan 31 (1979), 561–592

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vogan, D. and Zuckerman, G.: Unitary representations and cohomology,Compositio Math. 53 (1984), 51–90.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weissauer, R.: Differential formen Zu Unterguppen der Siegelsche Modulgruppe Zweiten Grades, J. reine angew. Math. 391 (1988), 100–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkataramana, T.N. Cohomology of Compact Locally Symmetric Spaces. Compositio Mathematica 125, 221–253 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002600432171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002600432171

Navigation