Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vitrectomy for traction macular edema

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Traction macular edema may develop through contraction of macular epiretinal membranes (ERM), or due to persistant vitreomacular traction during the evolution of vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effect of vitreous surgery and the release of the vitreomacular traction or the removal of epiretinal membranes, on the evolution of traction induced macular edema. Material and methods: Fourteen eyes from 14 patients presenting with idiopathic or secondary epiretinal membranes, and 11 eyes from 10 patients presenting with vitreomacular traction syndrome, underwent vitrectomy for reduced vision and cystoid macular edema, identified by slit-lamp examination and fluorescein angiography. No coexistent ocular conditions that might have caused macular traction were present. History, preoperative eye examination, operative findings, postoperative course and final examination as well as pre- and postoperative fluorescein angiography were reviewed. Results: In the ERM group, cystoid macular edema disappeared in all cases during the postoperative period and the mean visual acuity (VA) at the end of the follow-up (0.48 ± 0.23) significantly increased compared to the preoperative one (0.29 ± 0.2) (p=0.004). In the group of patients suffering from VMS, the posterior vitreous traction on the macula was released and macular edema disappeared in all cases but one. The mean v.a. at the end of the follow-up (0.42 ± 0.24) significantly increased compared to the preoperative one (0.18 ± 0.1) (p=0.01). Complications included intraoperative small petechias and postoperative progressive nuclear sclerosis, retinal detachment and retinal pigment epitheliopathy. Conclusions: Cystoid macular edema may develop secondary to vitreomacular traction syndrome or epiretinal membrane contraction. Vitrectomy is effective in releasing macular traction which, in turn, may induce a decrease of the macular edema with improvement of visual acuity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gass JDM. Macular dysfunction caused by vitreous and vitreoretinal interface abnormalities: vitreous traction maculopathies. In: Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases. St. Louis MO: CV Mosby, 1987; 676-93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boniuk M. Cystic macular edema secondary to vitreoretinal traction. Survey of Ophthalmol 1968; 13: 118-21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gass JDM. Macular dysfunction caused by epiretinal membrane contraction. In: Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases. St Louis MO: CV Mosby, 1997: 938-50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacDonald HR, Schatz H, Johnson RN. Introduction to epiretinal membranes. In: Ryan R. (ed), Retina. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994: vol II: 1819-25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margherio RS. Epiretinal macular membranes. In: Albert, Jakobiec (eds), Principle and practice of ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994: vol II: 919-26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barloon S, Marbeley Al, Kestle J. Effect of macular edema on surgical visual outcome in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

  7. Smiddy EW, Green WR, Michels GR, de la Cruz Z. Ultrastructural studies of vitreomacular syndrome. Am J Ophtalmol 1989; 107: 177-85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Trempe C. Course of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophtalmol 1994; 119: 55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Bustros S, Rice TA, Michels RG, Thompson JT, Marcus S, Glaser BM. Vitrectomy for macular pucker after treatment of retinal tears or retinal detachment. Arch Ophtalmol 1988; 106: 758-60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Michels RG. Vitreous surgery for macular pucker. Am J Ophtalmol 1981; 92: 628-39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG, Thompson JT, Debanne SM, Rowland DY. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophtalmology 1986; 93: 602-10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDonald HR, Johnson NR, Schatz H. Surgical results in the vitreomacular traction syndrome. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1397-1403.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG et al. Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophtalmol 1988; 105: 160-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Banker SA, Freeman RW, Kim WJ, Munguia D, Azen PS, the Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group. Vision-threatening complications of surgery for full-thickness macular holes. Ophtalmology 1997; 104: 1442-53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Monnier VM, Cerami A. Detection of nonenzymatic browning products in human lens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983; 760: 97-103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Eye Department, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland

    C. J. Pournaras, A. D. Kapetanios & G. Donati

Authors
  1. C. J. Pournaras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. D. Kapetanios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Donati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pournaras, C.J., Kapetanios, A.D. & Donati, G. Vitrectomy for traction macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol 97, 439–447 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002408206561

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002408206561

Keywords

Search

Navigation