Skip to main content
Log in

The Products of the Imagination: Psychoanalytic Theory and Postmodern Literary Criticism

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

This article considers some of the affinities between postmodern literary theory and the psychoanalytic theories concerned with intersubjective phenomena. Postmodern literary theory is described briefly, and it is argued that one of its major concerns is the nature of, and the political and cultural influences on, subjectivity and identity. Despite that, postmodernism generally, and literary postmodernism in particular, can be said to lack a theory of the psychological and interpersonal dimensions of the experience of self. This article contends that the more relational schools of psychoanalytic theory can provide an example of the construction of selfhood that is of importance to contemporary and postmodern literary criticism. The academy has, to a considerable extent identified ‘psychoanalysis’ with the work of Jacques Lacan, but since the 1980s the work of such theorists as Jane Flax and Jessica Benjamin, building on the work of Nancy Chodorow, have increasingly opened up the possibilities of relational and object relations theory for literary studies. The relational psychoanalytic theories operate in the same epistemological universe as postmodern literary criticism, congruent with the postmodern idea of ‘truth’ as constructed and relational, and selfhood as shifting, contingent, and always-in-process. Particular attention is paid to the work of Wilfred Bion, whose understanding of self provides an account both of the failure of meaning, and of the development of mind. Some examples of a relational approach to literary analysis are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, P. (1996). The Regeneration Trilogy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynard, P. (1999). Is it possible to apply literature to psychoanalysis? (Trans. by R. Bourgeois). American Imago 56:207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1990). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the Other: Intersubjectivity and Gender in Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W.R. (1989). Two Papers: The Grid and Caesura. London: arnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W.R. (1993). Second Thoughts: Selected Papers on Psycho-Analysis. London: Maresfield Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. (1994). Psychoanalyis and Storytelling, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casement, P. (1990). Learning from the Patient. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary Theory: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1996). The Illusions of Postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. (1996). Subject to Ourselves: Social Theory, Psychoanalysis and Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esman, A.H. (1998). What is “applied” in “applied” psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79:741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1990). Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P. (1999). The process of change and the change of processes: What can change in a “good” analysis. Keynote address to the American Psychological Association, http://psychematters.com/papers/fonagy/htm.

  • Gay, P. (1995). The Freud Reader. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, G. (1971). The Female Eunuch. London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1995). Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. (1975). Five Readers Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New York: Verson, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol formation in the development of the ego. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 11: 724–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, L. C. (1946). How many children had Lady Macbeth? In Explorations. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplanche, J., and Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. (Trans. by D. Nicholson-Smith). London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (1998). Killing Freud. In Open Minded: Working Out the Logic of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, N. (1997). Postmodern Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, J. (1984). Charlotte on the couch: The perils of posthumous analysis. In Charlotte Bronte and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, D. (1985). The Kleinian Development. Perthshire: Clunie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, K. (1971). Sexual Politics. London: Rupert Hart-Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1975). Psychoanalysis and Feminism. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.A. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. New York: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, S. (1996). The Father. New York: A.A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (1993). Why War? Psychoanalysis, Politics, and the Return to Melanie Klein. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossner, J. (1983). August. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roustang, F. (1990). The Lacanian Delusion. (Trans. G. Sims). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K. (1993). Tendencies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B.A. (1994). Introduction. In Literature and the Relational Self, pp. 1–28. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrye, H.K. (2000). Review of The Shadow of the Other. Dallas Society for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, http://www.dspp.com/review/wrye/htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souter, K.T. The Products of the Imagination: Psychoanalytic Theory and Postmodern Literary Criticism. Am J Psychoanal 60, 341–359 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002042814341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002042814341

Navigation