Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Consent: The Criminal Law in Europe and Overseas

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What role can the criminal law play in the battle against child sexual abuse? Should sexual relations of and with, persons under a certain age be criminalized regardless of the circumstances, even if they are consensual (“age of consent,” “minimum age”)? Where should such a minimum age-limit be fixed? Should there be a special, higher age-limit for particular conditions (e.g., “seduction,” “corruption”)? Should sexual contacts with minors within a relationship of authority be criminalized generally, or just if authority is abused? Should criminal proceedings be instituted ex officio or upon complaint only? Should authorities be provided with a power of discretion or should they be obliged to prosecute and sentence in each case? In answering these questions, it is highly beneficial to have a look across the borders to the solutions other countries have reached.

This study presents an overview on the criminal law governing the sexual behavior of, and with, children and adolescents in all European jurisdictions and in selected jurisdictions outside of Europe. It shows which categories of offences exist and from which age onward young people can effectively consent to various kinds of sexual behavior and relations in the different countries. All states in Europe and all of the studied jurisdictions overseas have minimum age limits for sexual relations, and punish sexual relations with persons under a certain age. Nowhere is this age set lower than 12 years. In Europe, in one-half of the jurisdictions, consensual sexual relations with 14-year-old adolescents are legal; in three-quarters, with 15-year olds; in a majority, this is also the case when the older partner has started the relation (and also when the initiative contains an offer of remuneration). In nearly all jurisdictions, such relations are legal from age 16 onward. Most states apply a higher age limit for contacts in relationships of authority. If the authority is not misused, the age limit in most jurisdictions is set between 14 and 16; if it is misused, between 16 and 18. Most states make no difference between heterosexual and homosexual relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Austria Press Agency. (1998). SchwedensParlament verbietet Kauf “sexueller Dienste,” 29.05.,Vienna.

  • Bundesministerium für Justiz. (1956–1962). Protokolle der Kommission zur Ausarbeitung eines Strafgesetzenwurfes, Vienna, Austria.

  • Criminal Law Revision Committee. (1984). 15th Report: Sexual Offences, London.

  • Committee of Ministers. (1993). Sexual exploitation, pornography and prostitution of, and trafficking in,children and young adults—Recommendation No.R(91)11 and Report of the European Committee on Crime Problems, Council of Europe Press: Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Ministers of the European Union. (1997). Joint Action concerning the combat against trafficking in humans and sexual exploitation of children, 97/154/JI, OJ L 63/2–6.

  • Danish Council for the Criminal Law. (1975). Straffelovradets udtalelse om strafferetlige aldersgraenser for seksuelle forhold; Betaenkning nr. 747, Copenhagen, 1975; unpublished translation into German by Mag. Kurt Krickler, Wien, 1984; see Council of Europe: Sexual Behaviour and Attitudes and Their Implications for Criminal Law, Reports presented to the 15th Criminological Research Conference, 1982, European Committee on Crime Problems, p. 188, Strasbourg, 1984.

  • Demsar, D. (1981). Law and Development in Yugoslavia. In Contemporary Developments in the Definition and Punishment of Sex Offences, Nouvelles Ètudes Pènales I, Toulouse.

  • Deutscher Bundesrat. (1992). Niederschrift über die 9.Sitzung des Ausschusses für Frauen und Jugend am 04.März 1992 in Bonn, Öffentliche Anhörung zum Sexualstrafrecht (§§ 175, 182 StGB), Bonn.

  • Deutscher Bundestag. (1970). 28., 29.und 30.Sitzung des Sonderausschusses für die Strafrechtsreform. Wahlperiode, Stenographischer Dienst, Bonn 23., 24.und 25.November 1970, Bonn.

  • Deutscher Bundestag. (1990). AIDS: Fakten und Konsequenzen, Endbericht der Enquetekommissiondes 11.Deutschen Bundestages “Gefahren von Aids und wirksame Wege zu ihrer Eindämmung” Zur Sache 90, 13, Bonn.

  • Deutscher Bundestag. (1993). Protokoll der 93.Sitzung des Rechtsausschusses am Mittwoch, dem 20.Oktober 1993 in Bonn, Öffentliche Anhörung, Protokoll Nr. 93, Bonn.

  • European Parliament. (1997). Resolution on the Respect for Human Rights within the European Union, 08 April, A4–0112/97, Strasbourg.

  • European Parliament. (1998a). Resolution on the Respect for Human Rights within the European Union, 17 February, A4–0034/98, Strasbourg.

  • European Parliament. (1998b). Resolution on Equal Rights of Lesbians and Gay Men in the European Union, 17 September, B4–0824 & 0852/98, Strasbourg.

  • European Parliament. (1998c). Resolution on the Respect for Human Rights within the European Union (1997), Strasbourg, December.

  • European Parliament (2000). Resolution on the Respect for Human Rights of Lesbians and Gay Men in the European Union, 16. March, A-0050/00, Strasbourg.

  • Fernand-Laurent, J. (1988). The Legal and Social Problems of Sexual Minorities, UN-Economic and Social Council Document (E/Cn.4/Sub.2/1988/31.06.1988), Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1995). Sexualität, Jugendschutz, & Menschenrechte— Ñber das Recht von Kindern und Jugendlichen auf sexuelle Selbstbestimmung, 2 Volumes, University of Vienna (Diss. iur.).

  • Graupner, H. (1997a). Keine Liebe zweiter Klasse—Diskriminierungsschutz und Partnerschaft für gleichgeschlechtlich L(i)ebende, Rechtskomitee LAMBDA, Vienna.

  • Graupner, H. (1997b). Sexualität, Jugendschutz, & Menschenrechte— Ñber das Recht von Kindern und Jugendlichen auf sexuelle Selbstbestimmung, 2 Volumes, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, M/Berlin/ Bern/New York/Paris/Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1997c). Sexuelle Mündigkeit—Die Strafgesetzgebung in europäischen und außereurop äischen Ländern, Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung 10(4): 281–310, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1997d). Austria. In West, D. J., and Green, R. (eds.), Socio-Legal Control of Homosexuality—A Multi-Nation Comparison(pp. 269–287). Plenum: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1997e).Wider die Gewalt—für die selbstbestimmte Sexualität, Das neue Sexualstrafrecht in Spanien und Italien (Teil I), Sexus 1 (II-IV), Aaptos: Vienna.

  • Graupner, H. (1997f).Wider die Gewalt—für die selbstbestimmte Sexualität, Das neue Sexualstrafrecht in Spanien und Italien (Teil I), Sexus 2 (II-IV), Aaptos: Vienna.

  • Graupner, H. (1998a). Von “Widernatürlicher Unzucht” zu “Sexueller Orientierung”—Homosexualität & Recht. In Roth, R., and Hey, B. (eds.), Que(e)erdenken: Weibliche/männliche Homosexualität und Wissenschaft, Studienverlag, Innsbruck.

  • Graupner, H. (1998b). Homosexualität und Strafrecht in Österreich, 6th ed., Rechtskomitee LAMBDA: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1998c). Keine Liebe zweiter Klasse—Diskriminierungsschutz und Partnerschaft für gleichgeschlechtlich L(i)ebende, 2nd ed., Rechtskomitee LAMBDA: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1998d). Update on Austria. Euroletter 65 (November).

  • Graupner, H. (2000). Keine Liebe zweiter Klasse—Diskriminierungsschutz und Partnerschaft für gleichgeschlechtlich L(i)ebende, 3rd ed., Rechtskomitee LAMBDA: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner, H. (1999). Love versus Abuse—Crossgenerational Sexual Relations of Minors: A Gay Rights Issue? Journal of Homosexuality 37(4): 23–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Health Council of the Netherlands. (1969). Memorie van Toelichting, Bijlage 4, Zitting, 1969–70— 10347; German Translation: Speijer-Report, Pais Press Produkt, Schweiz, 1976.

  • Horstkotte, H. (1984). Ages and Conditions of Consent in Sexual Matters. In Council of Europe, European Committee on Crime Problems, Sexual Behaviour and Attitudes and Their Implications for Criminal Law. Reports presented to the 15th Criminological Research Conference, 1982, p. 165ff, Strasbourg.

  • House of Commons. (1994). Minutes of the Debate on the Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill, 21.02.1994, 48 CD 21/28, London.

  • Human Rights Committee. (1998). Concluding Observations to the Report of Austria Submitted under Art.40 International Convenant of Civil and Political Rights, 46th session, Geneva: 11.11.1998.

  • International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC). (1998). IGLHRC Celebrates the 50th Anniversary of the UDHR, email 11.12.

  • Justis og politidepartementet. (1997). Seksuallovbrudd—Straffelovkommisjonens delutredning VI, NOU 1997:23, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (1997). Letter to the Author, 07.07., Kiev.

  • Ministry of Labour. (1998). Violence Against Women—Government bill, 1997/98:55, Fact Sheet, Swedish Government Offices: Stockholm.

  • Niederländische Strafrechtsreformkommission (Melai-Kommission). (1980). Schlußbericht, 1980, see Edward Brongersma, Schutzalter 12 Jahre?—Sex mit Kindern in der niederländischen Gesetzgebung, in: Angelo Leopardi, Der pädosexuelle Komplex, S. 213ff, Berlin/Fft. 1988.

  • Note. (1991). Constitutional Barriers to Civil and Criminal Restrictions on Pre-and Extramarital Sex. 104 Harvard Law Review1660.

  • Oikeusministeriön. (1993). Seksuaalirikokset—Rikoslakiprojektin ehdotus. Oikeusministeriön lainvalmisteluosaston julkaisu 8. Helsinki.

  • Österreichischer Nationalrat. (1995). Unterausschuß des Justizausschusses, Zusammenfassende Darstellung der Expertenanhörung zu den §§ 209, 220, 221 StGB, 10.10.1995 (Doc: U-AUJUS. DOC).

  • Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2000). Opinion No.216, 26th January.

  • Pizarro Beleza, T. (1996). Sem Sombra de Pecado—O Repensar dos Crimes Sexuais na Revisao do C´odigo Penal, Lisboa.

  • Policy Advisory Committee on Sexual Offences. (1981). Report on the Ages of Consent in Relation to Sexual Offences, London.

  • Posner, R. A., and Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A Guide to America's Sex Laws. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebane, I. (1980). Commented Soviet Estonian Penal Code. Eesti Raamat: Tallin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonewall. (1998). First Step to Equalize Age of Consent in UK, Euroletter 61, 4 (July).

  • Schweizer Expertenkommission für die Revision des Strafgesetzbuchs. (1977). Aenderung des Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes betreffend die Strafbaren Hanldungen gegen Leib und Leben, gegen die Sittlichkeit und gegen die Familie: Vorentwurf und Erläuternder Bericht zu den Vorentwürfen, 3.82 600 14786/1, 3.82 1400 14786/2, Bern.

  • Swedish Commission on Sexual Offences. (1976). Kjellin-Sexualbrottsutredningen, Sexuella övergrepp, Stockholm, 1976; (1) see Brongersma; E.: The Meaning of “Indecency” with Respect to Moral Offences Involving Children, British Journal of Criminology, 20, 20–34, 1980; (2) see Council of Europe: Sexual Behaviour and Attitudes and Their Implications for Criminal Law, Reports presented to the 15th Criminological Research Conference, 1982, European Committee on Crime Problems, Strasbourg, 1984; (3) see Verband von, 1974: Ein Land schafft gleiches Recht—Beitrag zur Diskussion um Paragraph 175 StGB nach amtlichen Drucksachen des Schwedischen Reichstages, Hamburg, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Reform Commission of Ireland. (1989). Consultation Paper on Child Sexual Abuse, Dublin.

  • The Law Reform Commission of Ireland. (1990). Report on Child Sexual Abuse, Dublin.

  • Walmsley, R., and White, K. (1979). Sexual Offences—Consent and Sentencing, Home Office Research Study No. 54, London.

  • Wockner, R. (1998). House of Lords Stalls Age-of-Consent Change, Euroletter 62, 10 (August).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vienna, Austria

    Helmut Graupner (attorney of law)

  2. Austrian Society for Sex Research (ÖGS), Austria

    Helmut Graupner (attorney of law)

  3. Austrian lesbian and gay rights organization Rechtskomitee LAMBDA (RKL), P.O. Box 388, A-1150, Vienna, Austria

    Helmut Graupner (attorney of law)

Authors
  1. Helmut Graupner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graupner, H. Sexual Consent: The Criminal Law in Europe and Overseas. Arch Sex Behav 29, 415–461 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001986103125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001986103125

Search

Navigation