Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 247–258 | Cite as

Agency-Based Tracking of Difficult-to-Follow Populations: Runaway and Homeless Youth Programs in St. Louis, Missouri

  • David E. Pollio
  • Sanna J. Thompson
  • Carol S. North

Abstract

Objectives. This study explored agency-based tracking methods for one of the most difficult-to-follow populations: runaway and homeless youth. Methods. A total of 118 program discharges from three federally funded agencies serving runaway/homeless youth in St. Louis, Missouri were tracked for a follow-up study of this population. Agency staff attempted to locate and interview program participants three months post-discharge using a protocol that systematically varied times and location of contact attempts. Separate analyses were conducted to compare the group of subjects whose locations were ascertained with those who were not, and who were successfully interviewed with those who were not. Variables related to the tracking protocol and individual descriptive and service use variables were examined in these analyses. Results. Sixty-nine percent of the sample was successfully located and fifty-nine percent interviewed. Significant findings included: fewer contact attempts over fewer days were made for individuals successfully interviewed, individuals tracked through Division of Family Services were less likely to be both located and interviewed, and individuals successfully located were significantly younger. Conclusions. This report provides encouraging evidence that even relatively unsophisticated protocols for tracking agency clients developed in collaboration with community agencies can—with consistent implementation—yield follow-up samples that are acceptably representative of program participants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Caton C, Wyatt RJ, Felix A, Grunberg J, Dominguez B. (1993). Follow-up of chronically homeless mentally ill men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1639-1642.Google Scholar
  2. Cottler LB, Compton WM, Ben-Abdullah A, Horne M, Claverie D. (1996). Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 41, 209-217.Google Scholar
  3. Cottler LB, Zipp JF, Robins LN, Spitznagel EL. (1987). Difficult to recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 125, 329-335.Google Scholar
  4. Desmond DP, Maddux JF, Johnson TH, Confer BA. (1995). Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. Journal of Substance AbuseTreatment, 12, 95-102.Google Scholar
  5. Fors SW, Rojek DG. (1991). A comparison of drug involvement between runaways and school youth. Journal of Drug Education, 21(1), 13-25.Google Scholar
  6. Greene JM, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. (1997). Substance use among runaway and homeless youth in three national samples. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 229-235.Google Scholar
  7. Gwadz M, Rotheram-Borus MJ. (1992). Tracking high-risk adolescents longitudinally.AIDS Education and Prevention, Supplement Fall 1992, 69-82.Google Scholar
  8. Heflin LJ, Rudy K. (1991). Homeless and in need for special education. Reston, VA: Council for exceptional children. (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 339 167.Google Scholar
  9. Kurtz JP, Jarvis SV, Kurtz GL. (1991). Problems of homeless youth: Empirical findings and human service issues. Social Work, 36, 309-314.Google Scholar
  10. McCarthy B, Hagan J. (1992). Mean streets: The theoretical significance of situational delinquency among homeless youths. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 597-627.Google Scholar
  11. National Clearinghouse on Families & Youth. (1997). Covering Youth and Family Issues. Silver Spring, MD: Federal Youth Services Board.Google Scholar
  12. Pires SD, Silber JT. (1996). Services for runaway and homeless youth. In Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society. BA Stroul, ed. Baltimore MD: Brookes Publishing. 513-533.Google Scholar
  13. Robertson MJ. (1991). Homeless women with children: The role of alcohol and other drug abuse. American Psychologist, 46, 1198-1204.Google Scholar
  14. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Koopman C, Haignere C, & Davies M. (1991). Reducing HIV sexual risk behaviors among runaway adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 1237-1241.Google Scholar
  15. Rotheram-Borus MJ. (1993). Suicidal behavior and risk factors among runaway youths. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 103-107.Google Scholar
  16. Smith EM, North CS, Spitznagel EL. (1995). Eighteen month follow-up data on a traetment program for homeless substance abusing mothers. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 14(4), 57-72.Google Scholar
  17. Temple MT, Leino EV. (1989). Long-term outcome of drinking: A 20 year longitudinal study of men. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 889-899.Google Scholar
  18. Whitbeck LB, Hoyt Dr, Ackley KA. (1997). Families of homeless and runaway adolescents: A comparison of parent/caretaker and adolescent perspectives on parenting, family violence, and adolescent conduct. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 517-528.Google Scholar
  19. Wright JD, Tupper LA, Devine JA. (1993). Tracking nontraditional populations in longitudinal studies. Department of Sociology, Tulane University, New Orleans. Unpublished manuscript, 1-33.Google Scholar
  20. Yates GL, MacKenzie R, Pennbridge J. (1988). A risk profile of runaway and non-runaway youth. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 820-821.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Pollio
    • 1
  • Sanna J. Thompson
    • 2
  • Carol S. North
    • 3
  1. 1.George Warren Brown School of Social WorkWashington UniversitySt. Louis
  2. 2.State University of New YorkBuffalo
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations