Both male ornamentation and male combat result in increased male mortality. Because population sizes are limited by a carrying capacity, increased age-specific adult male mortality will result in decreased age-specific adult female mortality, as well as decreased juvenile mortality. As intersexual competition is one form of intraspecific competition, through choosing to mate with ornamented and/or combative males, females in polygamous systems reduce intraspecific competition. Because average male fitness must exactly equal average female fitness, male fitness will paradoxically rise with increasing male mortality. This theory also offers new perspectives on peripheral problems to sexual theory, such as mate location, resource guarding, leks, harems, and others.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alexander, R.D. and G. Borgia (1979). On the origin and basis of the male-female phenomenon. In: M. Blum and N. Blum, eds., Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 417-440. New York, Academin Press.
Andersson, M. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818-820.
Andersson, M. (1986). Evotution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and inating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
Arak, A. (1983). Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature 306: 181-210.
Arnold, S.J. and M.J. Wade (1984). On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720-734.
Bannikov, A.G., L.V. Zhirnov, L.S. Lebedeva and A.A. Fandeey (1967). Biology of the Saiga, Jerusalem, Israel Program for Scientific Translations. (Translated from the Russian: 1961. Biologiya Saigaka, Izdatel'stvo Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Literatury, Zhurnalov i Plakatov, Moscow.)
Bateman, A.J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
Beer, J.R., L.D. Frenzel and C.F. MacLeod (1958). Sex ratios of some Minnesota rodents. American Midland Naturalist 59: 518-524.
Borgia, G. (1979). Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: M. Blum and N. Blum, eds., Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 19-80. New York, Academic Press.
Bradbury, J.W. and N.B. Davies (1987). Relative roles of intra-and intersexual selection. In: J.W. Bradbury and M.B. Andersson, eds., Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, pp. 143-163. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
Breden, F. and G. Stoner (1987). Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature 329: 831-833.
Clutton Brock, T.H., P.H. Harvey and B. Rudder (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionumic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269: 797-800.
Clutton-Brock, T.H., S.D. Albon, R.M. Gibson and F.E. Guinness (1979). The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behavior 27: 211-225.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London, John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd ed., rev. (1898). New York, D. Appleton and Co.
Davis, G.W.F. and P. O'Donald (1976). Sexual selection for a handicap: A critical analysis of Zahavi's model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 57: 345.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
de Vos, A., P. Brokx and V. Geist (1967). A review of social behavior of the North American cervids during the reproductive period. The American Midland Naturalist 77: 390-417.
Droney, D.C. (1992). Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: the roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Animal Behaviour 44: 1007-1020.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (1984). Reproductive Decisions: An Economic Analysis of Gelada Baboon Social Strategies. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Emlen, J.T. and L.W. Oring (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-223.
Endler, J.A. (1978). A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evolutionary Biology 11: 319-364.
Endler, J.A. (1980). Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34: 76-91.
Endler, J.A. (1982). Convergent and divergent effects of natural selection on color patterns in two fish faunas. Evolution 36: 178-188.
Endler, J.A. (1983). Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9: 173-190.
Estes, R.D. and J. Goddard (1967). Prey selection and hunting behavior of the African wild dog. Journal of Wildlife Management 31: 52-70.
Fisher, R.A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review 7: 184-192.
Fisher, R.A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2d revised edition. New York, Dover Publications.
Froehlich, J.W., R.W. Thorington, Jr. and J.S. Otis (1981). The demography of Howler Monkeys (Alouatta palliata) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. International Journal of Primatology 2: 207-236.
Geist, V. (1966). The evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour 27: 175-214.
Geist, V. (1971). Mountain Sheep. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Geist, V. (1974). On fighting strategies in animal combat. Nature 250: 354.
Gibson, R.M. (1990). Relationships between blood parasites, mating success and phenotypic cues in male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. American Zoologist 30: 271-278.
Gorsuch, D.M. (1934). Life history of the Gambel quail in Arizona. University of Arizona Bulletin 5 (Biological Scientific Bulletin No. 2).
Haas, R. (1976). Sexual selection in Nothobranchius guentheri (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 30: 614-622.
Halliday, T.R. (1983). The study of mate choice. In: P. Bateson, ed., Mate Choice, pp. 3-32. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, W.D. and M. Zuk (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218: 384-387.
Hammerstein, P. and G.A. Parker (1987). Sexual selection: games between the sexes. In: J.W. Bradbury and M.B. Andersson, eds., Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, pp. 119-142. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
Haskins, C.P., E.F. Haskins, J.J.A. McLaughlin and R.E. Hewitt (1961). Polymorphisms and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus an ecological study. In: W.F. Blair, ed., Vertebrate Speciation, pp. 329-395. Austin, Univ. Texas Press.
Hausfater, G., H.C. Gerhardt and G.M. Klump (1990). Parasites and mate choice in gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor. American Zoologist 30: 299-311.
Heisler, I.L. (1985). Quantitative genetic models of female choice based upon “arbitrary” male characters. Heredity 55: 187-198.
Höglund, J., J.A. Kålås and P. Fiske (1992). The costs of secondary sexual characters in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 309-315.
Hrdy, S.B. (1977). The langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Huxley, J.S. (1938). Darwin's theory of sexual selection and the data subsumed by it, in the light of recent research. American Naturalist 72: 416-433.
Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski and S. Nee (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences. II The “handicap” principle. Evolution 45: 1431-1442.
Kaissling, K.E. (1971). Insect olfaction. In: L. Beidler, ed., Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 4. Chemical Senses. New York, Springer-Verlag.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1986). The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work. American Naturalist 127: 222-240.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1987). The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. In: J.W. Bradbury and M.B. Andersson, eds., Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, pp. 119-142. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
Kodric-Brown, A. and J.H. Brown (1984). Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. American Naturalist 124: 309-23.
Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies (1992). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. London, Blackwell Scientific.
Kruijt, J.P. and J.A. Hogan (1967). Social behavior on the lek in Black Grouse, Lyrurus tetrix tetrix (L.) Ardea 55: 203-240.
Lande, R. (1980). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection of polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78: 3721-3725.
Lande, R. and S.J. Arnold (1985). Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 117: 651-664.
LeBoeuf, B.J. (1972). Sexual behaviour in the Northern Elephant Seal Mirounga angustirostris. Behaviour 41: 1-26.
LeBoeuf, B.J. (1974). Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist 14: 163-176.
Lloyd, J.E. and S.R. Wing (1983). Nocturnal acrical predation of fireflies by light-seeking fireflies. Science 222: 634-635.
Mackenzie, A., J.D. Reynolds and V.J. Brown (1995). Variation in male mating success on leks. The American Naturalist 145: 633-652.
Malthus, T. (1798). Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society, with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers.
Maynard Smith, J. (1976). Sexual selection and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 57: 239-242.
Maynard Smith, J. (1978). The handicap principle a comment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 70: 251-252.
Maynard Smith, J. (1985). (Mini Review) Sexual selection, handicaps and true fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology 115: 1-8.
Maynard Smith, J. (1991). Theories of sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 146-151.
McHugh, T. (1958). Social behavior of the American buffalo (Bison bison bison). Zoologica 43: 1-42.
Møller, A.P. (1990). Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Auimal Behaviour 40: 1185-1187.
Myers, J. and C. Krebs (1971). Sex ratios in open and closed vole populations: demographic implications. American Naturalist 105: 325-344.
O'Donald, P. (1962). The theory of sexual selection. Heredity 17: 541-552.
O'Donald, P. (1977). Theoretical aspects of sexual selection. Theoretical Population Biology 12: 298-334.
Orians, G. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and animals. American Naturalist 103: 589-603.
Parker, G.A. (1978). Evolution of competitive male searching. Annual Review of Entomology 23: 173-196.
Parker, G.A. (1979). Sexual selection and sexual confliet. In: M. Blum and N. Blum, eds., Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 123-176. New York, Academic Press. pp123-176.
Parker, G.A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decisions. In: P. Bateson, ed., Mate Choice, pp. 141-166. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pomiankowski, A. and Y. Iwasa (1993). Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 253: 173-181.
Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa and S. Ncc (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45: 1422-1430.
Poulton, E.B. (1890). The Colours of Animals: their Meaning and Use, especially considered in the case of Insects. London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, & Co.
Promislow, D.E.L., R. Montgomerie and T.E. Martin (1992). Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 250: 143-150.
Real, L. (1990). Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. The American Naturalist. 136: 376-405.
Ryan, M.J. (1985). The Túngara Frog: A Study of Sexual Selection and Communication. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Ryan, M.J. and A.S. Rand (1990). The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44: 305-314.
Ryan, M.J. and A.S. Rand (1993). Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
Schaller, G.B. (1972). The Serengeti Lion. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Seger, J. and R. Trivers (1986). Asymmetry in the evolution of female mating preferences. Nature 319: 771-773.
Selander, R.K. (1965). On mating systems and sexual selection. American Naturalist 99: 129-141.
Selander, R.K. (1972). Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In: B. Campbelt, ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, pp. 1871-1971. Chicago, Aldine.
Silverman, H.B. and M.J. Dunbar (1980). Aggressive tusk use by the narwhat Monodon monoceros L. Nature 284: 57-58.
Sorenson, M.W. (1974). A review of aggressive behavior in the tree shrews. In: R.L. Holloway, ed., Primate Aggression, Territoriality and Xenophobia, pp. 13-30. New York, Academic Press.
Sussman, R.W. and A. Richard (1974). The role of aggression among diurnal prosimians. In: R.L. Holloway, ed., Primate Aggression, Territoriality and Xenophobia, pp. 49-76. New York, Academic Press.
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychology 20: 410-433.
Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell, ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, pp. 139-179. Chicago, Aldine.
Turner, J.R.G. (1978). Why male butterflies are non-mimetic: natural selection, sexual selection, group selection, modification and sieving. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10: 385-432.
Verner, J. and M. Willson (1966). The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology 47: 143-147.
Walther, F.R. (1969). Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in Thomsons' gazelle (Gazella thomsoni Guenther 1884). Behaviour 34: 184-221.
West-Eberhard, M.J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 123: 222-234.
Wilkinson, P.F. and C.C. Shank (1976). Rutting-fight mortality among musk oxen on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Animal Behavior 24: 756-758.
Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Evolotiorary Thought. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Wood, D.H. (1970). An ecological study of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia) in a Southeast Queensland rain forest. Australian Journal of Zoology 18: 185-207.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 53: 205-214.
Zahavi, A. (1977). The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology 67: 603-605.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abraham, J.N. An Ecological Theory of Sexual Dimorphism in Animals. Acta Biotheor 46, 23–35 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000847803272
- Population Size
- Sexual Dimorphism
- Intraspecific Competition
- Ecological Theory
- Mate Location