Abstract
This paper describes both SuperText,a computer program designed to support productiveexpository writing processes among students at adistance teaching university, and its theoreticaljustification. Being able to write well is animportant communication skill, and the writingprocess can help to build and clarify the writer‘sknowledge. Computers can support this by providing amedium to externalise and record the writer‘sunderstanding. Representations appropriate to thisexternalisation are uninstantiated idea labels,instantiated text units, and a variety ofrelationships between these items. SuperText usesthese representations to support a range of writingstyles. It provides several independent ’Views‘ thatrepresent the structure of the evolving documentthrough expanding hierarchies, each with a varietyof ‘Presentations’. Allied to these Views is a textwork space providing access to a database ofcontinuous text nodes. Taken together, these providean ability to represent global and intermediatestructures of the document well beyond that ofconventional editors. These aspects were all ratedhighly by students participating in a series offield trials of SuperText.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, W. "Computerised Invention for Composing: An Update and Review". Computers and Composition, 9(1) (1991), 25–38.
Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987.
Bridwell-Bowles, L., P. Johnson and S. Brehe "Composing and Computers: Case Studies of Experienced Writers". In Writing in Real Time: Modelling Production Processes. Ed. A. Matsuhashi, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987, pp. 81–107.
Byrne, D. Selves and Others: The Politics of Difference in the Writing of Ursula Kroeber le Guinn. D Lit et Phil thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1966.
Flower, L. and J. Hayes. "The Dynamics of Composing: Making Plans and Juggling Constraints". In Cognitive Processes in Writing. Ed. L. Gregg and I. Steinberg, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1980, pp. 31–50.
Flower, L. and J. Hayes. "Images, Plans, and Prose. The Representation of Meaning in Writing". Written Communication, 1(1) (January 1984), 120–160.
Freedman, S. W., A. Dyson, L. Flower and W. Chafe. Research in Writing: Past, Present, and Future. Centre for the Study of Writing, University of California, Berkeley, and Carnegie-Mellon University. (Technical Report No 1.), 1987.
Friedman, M. and E. Rand. "A Computer-Based Writing Aid for Students: Present and Future". In Computer Writing Environments. Ed. B. Britton and S. Glynn, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1989, pp. 129–141.
Galbraith, D. "Conditions for Discovery through Writing". Instructional Science, 21 (1992), 45–72.
Gay, P. "Questions and Issues in Basic Writing and Computing]]. Computers and Composition, 8(3) (1991), 63–81.
Hartley, J. "Writing: A Review of the Research, Chap 2". In Technology and Writing: Readings in the Psychology of Written Communication. Ed. J. Hartley, London: Kingsley, 1992, pp. 18–36.
Hayes, J. and L. Flower. "Writing Research and the Writer". American Psychologist, 41(10) (October 1986), 1106–1113.
Kellogg, R. and S. Mueller. "Performance Amplification and Process Restructuring in Computerbased Writing". International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39 (1993), 33–49.
Kellogg, R. "Designing Idea Processors for Document Composition". Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 2 (1986), 118-128. Reprinted in 1992 as chap 16 in Technology and Writing: Readings in the Psychology of Written Communications. Ed. J. Hartley, London: Kingsley, pp. 181-199.
Kotzen, A. Changing SuperText to Access a Database. Unpublished report, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1995.
Lowenstein, S. (Untitled). Unpublished report, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1995.
Macdonald, N., L. Frase, P. Gingrich and S. Keenan. "The Writer's Workbench-Computer Aids for Text Analysis". IEEE Transactions on Communications, 30(1) (1982).
Markel, M. "Behaviors, Attitudes, and Outcomes: A Study of Word Processing and Writing Quality Among Experienced Word-Processing Students". Computers and Composition, 11 (1994), 49–58.
Scardamalia, M. and C. Bereiter. "Knowledge Telling and Knowledge Transforming in Written Composition". In Advances in Applied Linguistics, Vol 2: Reading, Writing, and Language Learning. Ed. S. Rosenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1987, pp. 142–175. (Cambridge Monographs and Texts in Applied Linguistics.)
Sharples, M. and L. Pemberton. Starting from the Writer: Guidelines for the Design of User-centred Document Processors. Brighton: School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex (Cognitive Science Research Paper No. 154.), 1990.
Smit, S. SuperSpecs Development and Design-The Use and Adaption of SuperText Specifically for the Drafting of User Requirements and Functional Specifications of Software Systems. Unpublished report, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1996.
Smith, J. and M. Landsman. "A Cognitive Basis for a Writing Environment". In Computer Writing Environments. Ed. B. Britton and S. Glynn. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1989, pp. 17–56.
Streitz, N., J. Hanneman and M. Thüring. "From Ideas and Arguments to Hyperdocuments: Travelling through Activity Spaces". In Proceedings of Hypertext '89. New York: ACM SIGCHI, 1989, pp. 342–364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrow, J. A Writing Support Tool with Multiple Views. Computers and the Humanities 31, 13–30 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000470103839
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000470103839