Advertisement

Space Science Reviews

, Volume 94, Issue 1–2, pp 99–112 | Cite as

Physical Causes of Solar Activity

  • N.O. Weiss
  • S.M. Tobias
Article

Abstract

The magnetic fields that dominate the structure of the Sun's atmosphere are controlled by processes in the solar interior, which cannot be directly observed. Magnetic activity is found in all stars with deep convective envelopes: young and rapidly rotating stars are very active but cyclic activity only appears in slow rotators. The Sun's 11-year activity cycle corresponds to a 22-year magnetic cycle, since the sunspot fields (which are antisymmetric about the equator) reverse at each minimum. The record of magnetic activity is aperiodic and is interrupted by episodes of reduced activity, such as the Maunder Minimum in the seventeenth century, when sunspots almost completely disappeared. The proxy record from cosmogenic isotopes shows that similar grand minima recur at intervals of around 200 yr. The Sun's large-scale field is generated by dynamo action rather than by an oscillator. Systematic magnetic cycles are apparently produced by a dynamo located in a region of weak convective overshoot at the base of the convection zone, where there are strong radial gradients in the angular velocity Ω. The crucial parameter (the dynamo number) increases with increasing Ω and kinematic (linear) theory shows that dynamo action can set in at an oscillatory (Hopf) bifurcation that is probably subcritical. Although it has been demonstrated that the whole process works in a self-consistent model, most calculations have relied on mean-field dynamo theory. This approach is physically plausible but can only be justified under conditions that do not apply in the Sun. Still, mean-field dynamos do reproduce the butterfly diagram and other key features of the solar cycle. An alternative approach is to study generic behaviour in low-order models, which exhibit two forms of modulation, associated with symmetry-breaking and with reduced activity. Comparison with observed behaviour suggests that modulation of the solar cycle is indeed chaotic, i.e. deterministically rather than stochastically driven.

Keywords

Solar Cycle Magnetic Activity Proxy Record Maunder Minimum Magnetic Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baliunas, S. and Jastrow, R: 1990, ‘Evidence for long-term brightness changes of solar-type stars’, Nature 348, 520–523.Google Scholar
  2. Bazilevskaya, G.A., 2000: ‘Observations of Variability in Cosmic Rays’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, J.: 2000, ‘Long Term, Indirect Indices of Solar Variability’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, J., Tobias, S.M., and Weiss, N.O.: 1998, ‘An active Sun throughout the Maunder Minimum’, Solar Phys. 181, 237–249.Google Scholar
  5. Cattaneo, F.: 1999, ‘On the Origin of Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Photosphere’, Astrophysical Journal 515, L39–L42.Google Scholar
  6. Childress, S. and Gilbert, A.D.: 1995, ‘Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo’, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Gilman, P.A.: 1983, ‘Dynamically consistent nonlinear dynamos driven by convection in a rotating spherical shell. II-Dynamos with cycles and strong feedbacks’, Astrophysical Journal Supp. Ser. 53, 243–268.Google Scholar
  8. Knobloch, E., Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 1997, ‘Modulation and symmetry changes in stellar dynamos’, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 297, 1123–1138.Google Scholar
  9. Küker, M., Arlt, R., and Rüdiger, G.: 1999, ‘The Maunder minimum as due to magnetic Lambda-quenching’, Astron. Astrophys. 343, 977–982.Google Scholar
  10. Miesch, M.: 1999, ‘The Coupling of Solar convection and rotation’, preprintGoogle Scholar
  11. Moffatt, H.K., 1978: ‘Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Parker, E.N., 1979: ‘Cosmical Magnetic Fields: their origin and their activity’, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pipin, V.V., 1999: ‘The Gleissberg cycle by a nonlinear alpha Lambda dynamo’, Astron. Astrophys. 346, 295–302.Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, P.H., 1994: ‘Fundamentals of Dynamo Theory’ in Lectures on Solar and Planetary Dynamos, M.R.E. Proctor and A.D. Gilbert (eds), Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
  15. Rosner, R.: 1999, ‘Magnetic fields of stars’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A., in press.Google Scholar
  16. Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M., and Ferriz-Mas, A.: 1996, ‘Intermittent solar activity by an on-off dynamo’ Astron. Astrophys. 311, L1–L4.Google Scholar
  17. Schou, J. et al: 1998, ‘Helioseismic Studies of Differential Rotation in the Solar Envelope by the Solar Oscillations Investigation Using the Michelson Doppler Imager’, Astrophysical Journal 505, 390–417.Google Scholar
  18. Spruit, H.C.: 2000, ‘Theory of Solar Irradiance Variations’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.Google Scholar
  19. Tayler, R.J.: 1997, ‘The Sun as a star’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, J.H. and Weiss, N.O.: 1992, The theory of sunspots, in Sunspots: Theory and observations; Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Theory of Sunspots, J.H. Thomas and N.O. Weiss (eds), Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 3–59.Google Scholar
  21. Tobias, S.M.: 1996, ‘Grand minima in nonlinear dynamos’, Astron. Astrophys. 307, L21–L24.Google Scholar
  22. Tobias, S.M.: 1997, ‘The solar cycle: parity interactions and amplitude modulation’, Astron. Astrophys. 322, 1007–1017.Google Scholar
  23. Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 1999, ‘Resonant Interactions between solar activity and climate’, J. Climate, submitted.Google Scholar
  24. Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 2000, ‘Resonance in a coupled solar-climate model’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.Google Scholar
  25. Tobias, S.M., Weiss, N.O., and Kirk, V.: 1995, ‘Chaotically modulated stellar dynamos’, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 273, 1150–1166.Google Scholar
  26. Weiss, N.O.: 1994, ‘Solar and stellar dynamos’, in Lectures on Solar and Planetary Dynamos, M.R.E. Proctor and A.D. Gilbert (eds), Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • N.O. Weiss
    • 1
  • S.M. Tobias
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations