Skip to main content
Log in

Is Chromatography a Science, a Process, a Method, or a Scientific Discipline?

  • Published:
Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the controversy over an article entitled “Chromatography as a Scientific Discipline” by V.G. Berezkin, it was pointed out that the subdivision of chromatographic processes into “sorption–sieve chromatography” and “field nonsorption chromatography” is inadmissible. It was demonstrated that all chromatographic processes, including flow fractionation in a transverse force field, are in principle two-phase (or polyphase) processes. It was illustrated that a longitudinal field in a flow cannot introduce a chromatographic component into the system. An additional definition of chromatography as a phenomenon was proposed on the basis of key points revealed by Professor Berezkin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Berezkin, V.G., Zavod. Lab., 1999, vol. 65, no. 8, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ettre, L.S., Pure Appl. Chem.,1993, vol. 65, p. 819.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khromatografiya. Osnovnye ponyatiya. Terminologiya. Sbornik nauchno-normativnoi terminologii (Chromatography, Basic Concepts, and Terminology. A Dictionary of Scientific Terms), Scientific Council on Chromatography of Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 114, Davankov A.V., Ed., Moscow, 1977.

  4. Davankov, V.A., Chromatographia, 1996, vol. 42, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ettre, L.S. andHinshaw, J.W., Chromatographia, 1996, vol. 43, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davankov, V.A., Chromatographia, 1997, vol. 44, p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davankov, V.A., Chromatographia, 1998, vol. 48, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davankov, V.A.,Onuchak, L.A.,Kudryashov, S.Yu., andArutyunov, Yu.I., Chromatographia, 1999, vol. 49, p. 449.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davankov, V.A.,Onuchak, L.A.,Kudryashov, S.Yu., andArutyunov, Yu.I., Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1999, vol. 73, p. 1783.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Volkov, S.A., Zh. Anal. Khim., 1999, vol. 54, no. 10, p. 1107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davankov, V.A., Zh. Fiz. Khim., 2000, vol. 74, no 10 (in press).

  12. Ettre, L.S., Chromatographia, 2000, vol. 51, no. 1/2, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sovetskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' (Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary), Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1987.

  14. Ogurtsov, A.P., Distsiplinarnaya struktura nauki (Disciplinary Structure of Science), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stolyarov, B.V.,Savinov, I.M.,Vitenberg, A.G., et al., Prakticheskaya gazovaya i zhidkostnaya khromatogra-fiya (A practical Guide to Gas and Liquid Chromatography), St. Petersburg: S. Peterb. Gos. Univ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parcher, J.F., Chromatographia, 1998, vol. 47, p. 570.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davankov, V.A. Is Chromatography a Science, a Process, a Method, or a Scientific Discipline?. Journal of Analytical Chemistry 56, 88–93 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026783832159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026783832159

Keywords

Navigation