Advertisement

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 33, Issue 11, pp 1093–1098 | Cite as

The use of electrochemical noise measurements to detect bad copper electrorefining conditions

  • B. Veilleux
  • A.-M. Lafront
  • E. Ghali
  • P.R. Roberge
Article

Abstract

Additives like thiourea, gelatin and chloride are used during copper electrorefining to promote a smooth deposit. However, additives can also facilitate nodule formation when their ratios and/or concentrations are inadequate. A preliminary investigation was conducted to determine if electrochemical noise (EN) measurements could be used to monitor and detect inefficient copper electrorefining conditions due to improper ratios and/or concentrations of additives. EN measurements were carried out in the laboratory under simulated industrial conditions. Galvanostatic experiments were conducted using a synthetic electrolyte containing different concentrations of additives. A 316L SS cathode and industrial copper anodes were used. The effects of three different data acquisition frequencies were also investigated. EN signals obtained as potential time record series were studied using statistical analyses and frequency domain transforms. The different calculated parameters gave similar results for all conditions studied except when additives present in the electrolyte led to nodule formation. Results also showed that the data acquisition frequency must be at least 10 Hz to detect improper ratios and/or concentrations of additives.

additives chloride copper electrorefining electrochemical noise measurements (EN) frequency domain transforms gelatin glue kurtosis skewness statistical analysis thiourea 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    X. Cheng and J.B. Hiskey, Metall. Trans. B 27B (1998) 53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. De Maere and R. Winand, Proceedings of copper 95-cobre 95 International Conference, Vol. III - Electrorefining and Hydrometallurgy of copper (1995) pp. 267-284.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Forsen, Copper ’90 Refining, fabrication, markets (1990) pp. 189-197.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.F. Suarez and F.A. Olson, J. Appl. Electrochem. 22 (1992) 1002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Ilgar, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Missouri (1993) pp. 53- 117.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Veilleux, A.-M. Lafront and E. Ghali, Can. Metall. Quart. 40 (2001) 343.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Veilleux, A.-M. Lafront and E. Ghali, Can. Metall. Quart. 41 (2002) 47.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Veilleux, Ph.D. Thesis, Laval University (2000).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.A. Eden, Electrochem. Noise (2000) 1227.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Cottis and S. Turgoose, Electrochem. Impedance Noise (2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.-M. Lafront, B. Veilleux and E. Ghali, J. Appl. Electrochem. (2000) in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Veilleux
    • 1
  • A.-M. Lafront
    • 1
  • E. Ghali
    • 1
  • P.R. Roberge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mining, Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringLaval UniversitySte-FoyCanada
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringRoyal Military College of CanadaKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations