Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial distribution of roots of pearl millet on sandy soils of Niger

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Root sampling in crop stands of low planting density requires reliable information on horizontal distribution of roots. This applies particularly to pearl millet in the Sahel, which is sown at a rate of less than two pockets of seed per m2. The objective of this study was to investigate the spatial variability of root length density (RLD) among sampling positions in an improved management system with ridging and under traditional sowing. RLD between ridges (bR) was lower compared to sampling positions within ridges (wR) at soil depth layers from 0 to 80 cm soil depth. We found a highly significant, positive correlation between the sum of the root length (RL) of four sampling dates (tillering, booting, flowering, and maturity) with shoot dry mass (SDM) at maturity. The square of the correlation coefficient was highest when calculation of RL was based on RLD at all four sampling positions. While SDM exhibited significant differences among three pearl millet varieties, sole root sampling wR at a lateral distance of 60 cm relative to the pocket would not allow for the detection of varietal differences in RL, while all other sampling positions did. The correlation between RL and SDM was considerably improved if information of RLD bR was included. Under traditional sowing, RLD directly under the plant was lower compared to sampling positions at lateral distance 25 and 50 cm from the centre of the pocket, but this effect of sampling position was not significant. RLD estimates within deeper soil layers were not systematically affected by direction and lateral distance. To obtain accurate information about depth of rooting and RL under traditional sowing, samples should be taken from lateral distances between 20 and 40 cm from the pocket centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affholder F 1995 Effect of organic matter input on the water balance and yield of millet under tropical dryland conditions. Field Crops Res. 41, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlrichs J L, Duncan R R, Ejeta G, Hill P R, Baligar V C, Wright R J, Hanna W W and Wright R J 1991 Pearl millet and sorghum tolerance to aluminium in acid soil. In Plant and Soil Interactions at low pH. Eds. R J Wright, V C Baligar, R P Murrmann. pp. 947–951. Development in Plant and Soil Science, Vol. 45. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato M and Pardo A 1994 Root length and biomass losses during sample preparation with different screen mesh sizes. Plant Soil 161, 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azam-Ali S N, Gregory P J and Monteith J L 1984 Effects of planting density on water use and productivity of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides) grown on stored water. I. Growth of roots and shoots. Exp. Agric. 20, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G, Castrignano A, Pagès L and van Noordwijk M 2000: Sampling Strategies, Scaling, and Statistics. In Root Methods. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin, S C van de Geijn. pp. 147–173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D A and Scott H 1984 Dependence of crop growth and yield on root development and activity. In Roots, Nutrient and Water Influx, and Plant Growth. ASA Special Publication No. 49. pp. 101–136.

  • Buerkert A 1995 Effects of crop residues, phosphorus, and spatial soil variability on yield and nutrient uptake of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in Southwest Niger. Verlag Ulrich Grauer, Stuttgard, 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopart J L 1983 Etude du systeme racinaire du mil (Pennisetum typhoides) dans un sol sableux du Sénégal. Agron. Trop. 38, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst M, Römheld V and Marschner H 1989 Estimation of phosphorus uptake capacity by different zones of the primary root of soil-grown maize (Zea mays L.). J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 152, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO-UNESCO 1988 Soil Map of the World. UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajri P R, Arora V K and Kumar K 1994 A procedure for determining average root length density in row crops by single-site augering. Plant Soil 160, 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J and Reddy M S 1982 Root growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Res. 5, 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J and Squire G R 1979 Irrigation effects on roots and shoots of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides). Exp. Agric. 15, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner H, Bley J, Bationo A, Martin P and Marschner H. 1993 Effect of crop residues on root growth and nutrient acquisition of pearl millet in an acid sandy soil in Niger. Plant Soil 150, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm I 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaij M C and Hoogmoed W B 1993 Soil management for crop production in the West African Sahel. II. Emergence, establishment, and yield of pearl millet. Soil Till. Res. 25, 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Prihar S S and Gajri P R 1993 Determination of root distribution of wheat by auger sampling. Plant Soil 149, 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura A, Inanaga S and Sugimoto Y 1996 Mechanism of interspecific differences among four gramineous crops in growth response to soil drying. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 65, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre B D, Riha S J and Flower D J 1995 Water uptake by pearl millet in a semiarid environment. Field Crops Res. 43, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengel D B and Barber S A 1974 Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agron. J. 66, 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto T, Shimoda K and Matsuzaki A 1991 Elongation angle of nodal roots and its possible relation to spatial root distribution in maize and foxtail millet. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 60, 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicou R 1974 Contribution a l'étude et a l'amelioration de la porosité des sols sabluex et ablo-argileux de la zone tropicale sèche; conséquence agronomique. Agron. Trop. 29, 1100–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne W A 1999 Shallow tillage with a traditional West African hoe to conserve soil water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 972–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne W A, Wendt C and Lascano R J 1990 Root zone water balance of three low-input millet fields in Niger, West Africa. Agron. J. 82, 813–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne W A, Williams J H, Keibstella M M and Stern R D 1998. Crop diversification in the Sahel through use of environmental changes near Faidherbia Albida (Del.) A. Chev. Crop Sci. 38, 1585–1591.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1996 SAS/STAT Software. Release 6.11, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire G R, Ong C K and Monteith J L 1987 Crop growth in semi-arid environments. p. 219–231. In Proceedings of the International Pearl Millet Workshop, 7–11 April 1986, ICRISAT Centre, India, Patancheru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingrobe B 2001 Root renewal of sugar beet as a mechanism of P uptake efficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F 1988 Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density. I. Effect of compactions on spatial arrangement of roots. Plant Soil 107, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersection method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M and Floris J 1979 Loss of dry weight during washing and storage of root samples. Plant Soil 53, 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Floris J and de Jager A 1985 Sampling schemes for estimating root density distribution in cropped fields. Neth. J Agric. Sci. 33, 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Staveren J P and Stoop W A 1985 Adaptation to toposequence land types in west Africa of different sorghum genotypes in comparison with local cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), millet (Pennisetum americanum) and maize (Zea mays). Field Crops Res. 11, 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorasoot N 1983 Root growth in intercropped pearl millet and groundnut. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 16, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • West L T, Wilding L P, Landeck J K and Calhoun F G 1984 Soil survey of the ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Niger, West Africa. Texas A&M University/TropSoils, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi A, Kono Y and Tatsumi K 1987 Comparison of root structures of 13 species of cereals. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 56, 618–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaongo C G L, Hossner L R and Wendt C W 1994 Root distribution, water use, and nutrient uptake of millet and grain sorghum on west African soils. Soil Sci. 157, 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Brück.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brück, H., Piro, B., Sattelmacher, B. et al. Spatial distribution of roots of pearl millet on sandy soils of Niger. Plant and Soil 256, 149–159 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026246728095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026246728095

Navigation