Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problems in polychaete systematics

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some of the intriguing issues in current polychaete systematics are reviewed. (1) The root of the `polychaete' tree. Currently there are two major hypotheses concerning the root position among polychaetes. One is based on rooting cladograms with outgroups such as Mollusca and result in simple-bodied taxa such as Opheliidae and Questidae forming a basal annelid grade along with Clitellata. Other hypotheses do not use outgroup rooting but involve scenarios on the evolution of the group and would place taxa in Aciculata as basal annelids, thus making Aciculata and Phyllodocida paraphyletic. Molecular sequence data has been of little help in resolving this issue thus far, largely due to limited taxon sampling. (2) Paraphyly. Owing, in part, to a tradition involving the emphasis on differences among taxa, and the application of Linnean ranks (e.g., family), paraphyly is undoubtedly a widespread phenomenon in polychaete systematics. An example of this has been proposed already for Spionidae. If the tree topology and rooting used by Blake & Arnofsky (1999) is correct, Spionidae is made paraphyletic by the recognition of the following four family-ranked taxa; Trochochaetidae, Poecilochaetidae, Longosomatidae and Uncispionidae. Another possible example is seen with Cirratulidae. A preliminary cladistic analysis shows that it is entirely possible that seven other taxa recognised as families may be nested within Cirratulidae. These include Acrocirridae, Ctenodrilidae, Fauveliopsidae, Flabelligeridae, Flotidae, Poeobiidae and Sternaspidae. (3) Problematic taxa. Apart from the problems exposed by the analysis of Cirratuliformia, the position of some of these groups, such as Aberranta, Alciopidae, Hesionides,Lopadorhynchidae, Microphthalmus,Nerillidae, Spinther,Tomopteridae and Sabellariidae, is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkesson, B., 1962. The embryology of Tomopteris helgolandica (Polychaeta). Acta zool. 43: 135–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse, K., 1969. Acrocirridae n. fam. (Polychaeta Sedentaria). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 2595–2620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, E., 1914. Zur Systematik der Polychaetenfamilie der Phyllodociden. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 3: 37–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betrem, J. G., 1925. Een nieuwe aan de Anneliden verwante diervorm, het nieuwe genus Enigma. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Vereen. 19: 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. A. & P. L. Arnofsky, 1999. Reproduction and larval development of the spioniform Polychaeta with application to systematics and phylogeny. Hydrobiologia 402: 57–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. A. & M. E. Peterson, 2000. 3. Family Fauveliopsidae Hartman, 1971. In Blake, J. A., B. Hilbig & P. H. Scott (eds), Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. 7. The Annelida. Part 4. Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae to Sternaspidae. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara: 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., G. Rouse, P. Hutchings & D. Colgan, 1999. Assessing the usefulness of histone H3, U2 snRNA and 28S rDNA in analyses of polychaete relationships. Aust. J. Zool. 47: 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, N. J., 1990. A reassessment of the enigmatic Burgess Shale fossil Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) and its relationship to the polychaete Canadia spinosa Walcott. Paleobiology 16: 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzhinskaja, G. N., 1977. Flota vitjasi sp. n. a new deepwater pelagic species of the family Fauveliopsidae (Polychaeta, Annelida). Issled. Fauny Morei, Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk USSR 20: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzhinskaja, G. N., 1996. Unique morphological features of certain deep-water pelagic polychaetes. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 347: 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantino, P. D. & K. de Queiroz, 2000. PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature. http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode.

  • Clark, R. B., 1969. Systematics and Phylogeny: Annelida, Echiura, Sipuncula. In Florkin, M. & B. T. Scheer (eds), Chemical Zoology. Academic Press, New York: 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, S. & J. S. Peel, 1995. Articulated halkieriids from the lower Cambrian of north Greenland and their role in early protostome evolution. Phil. trans. r. Soc. Lond. B, 347: 305–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E., 1955. On the morphology and affinities of the annelid genus Sternaspis. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift N.F. 51: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, T. G., J. Lundberg, F. Pleijel & P. Sundberg, 2000. Morphological and molecular evidence of the phylogeny of Nereidiform polychaetes (Annelida). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 38: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, R. P., 1955. The evolution of the pelagic alciopid and phyllodocid polychaetes. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 125: 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, R. P., 1962. The polychaete stomodeum and the interrelationships of the families of the Polychaeta. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 139: 289–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, R. P., 1963. Annelids. Hutchinson University Library, London. 200 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. H., 1967. A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Part 2. Sedentaria. British Museum of Natural History Publications no. 656, London: 459–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibye-Jacobsen, D., 1993. On the phylogeny of the Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta: Annelida): an alternative. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch 31: 174–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald, K., 1977. The polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Ang. Cty. Sci. Ser. 28: 1–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald, K. & G. W. Rouse, 1997. Polychaete systematics: Past and present. Zool. Scr. 26: 71–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel, P., 1927. Polychètes sedentaires. Addenda aux Errantes, Archiannelides, Myzostomaires. Faune Fr. 16: 1–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh, K., 1989. A systematic revision of the Sabellidae-Caobangiidae-Sabellongidae complex (Annelida: Polychaeta). Bull. am. Mus. nat. Hist. 192: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. D. & G. Hartmann-Schröder, 1985. Polychaetes: British Amphinomida, Spintherida and Eunicida. Synopses Brit. Fauna, New Ser. 32: 1–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. D. & M. E. Petersen, 1991. The validity of the genus Zeppelina (Vaillant) (Polychaeta: Ctenodrilidae). Ophelia suppl. 5: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1912. Nerilla, an archiannelid. Q. J. microsc. Sci. 57: 397–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, A. E., 1850. Die Familien der Anneliden. Arch. Naturgesch. 16: 249–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, A. E., 1873. Die Familie der Cirratuliden. Jber schles. Ges. vaterl. Kult. 50: 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, O., 1948. The polychaetous annelids of Alaska. Pacif. Sci. 2: 3–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, O., 1965. Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas. Occ. Pap. Allan Hancock Fdn 28: 1–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, O., 1967. Polychaetous annelids collected by the USNS Eltanin and Staten Island cruises, chiefly from Antarctic seas. Allan Hancock Monogr. mar. Biol. 2: 1–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, O., 1971. Abyssal polychaetous annelids from the Mozambique Basin off southeast Africa, with a compendium of abyssal polychaetous anneilds from world-wide areas. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 28: 1407–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1996. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. Gustav Fischer, Jena. 648 pp.

  • Heath, H., 1930. A connecting link between the Annelida and the Echiuroidea (Gephyrea Armata). J. Morph. 49: 223–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouin C., 1967. Étude morphologique et anatomique de Nerillidopsis hyalina Jouin et de quelques Nerillidium Remane (Archiannélides, Nerillidae). Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 108: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouin, C. & B. Swedmark, 1965. Paranerilla limicola n.g., n.sp., Archiannélide Nerillidae du benthos vaseux marin. Cah. Biol. mar. 6: 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight-Jones, P., 1981. Behaviour, setal inversion and phylogeny of Sabellida (Polychaeta). Zool. Scr. 10: 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, S., 1998. Paraphyletic status of Polychaeta suggested by phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences of Elongation Factor 1-alpha. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 9: 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, S. M., 1967. The polychaete Spinther and the origin of the Arthropoda. J. nat. Hist. 1: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., 2001. On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta. Proc. r. Soc. Lond. ser. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 1089–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, D., 1997. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 8006–8009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil, F., 1899. La position systématique des Flabelligériens St. Joseph (Chlorémiens Quatrefages) et des Sternaspiens. Zool. Anz. 22: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil, F. & M. Caullery, 1897. Sur la position systématique du genre Ctenodrilus Clap.; ses affinités avec les Cirratuliens. C. r. hebd. des Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 125: 542–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonato, E. F., 1966. Sternaspis capillata sp.n. (Annelida, Polychaeta). Bolm Inst. Oceanogr., S. Paulo 15: 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage, L. & D. Eibye-Jacobsen, 1998. On the anatomy of the central nervous system of phyllodocidae (Polychaeta) and the phylogeny of Phyllodocid genera: a new alternative. Acta zool. 79: 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. E., 2000. A new genus of Fauveliopsidae (Annelidae: Polychaeta), with a review of its species and redescription of some described taxa. Bull. mar. Sci. 67: 491–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. E. & D. J. George, 1991. A new species of Raricirrus from northern Europe, with notes on its biology and a discussion of the affinities of the genus (Polychaeta: Ctenodrilidae). Ophelia supp. 5: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel, F., 1991. Phylogeny and classification of the Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta). Zool. Scr. 20: 225–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel, F. & T. Dahlgren, 1998 Position and delineation of Chrysopetalidae and Hesionidae (Annelida, Polychaeta, Phyllodocida). Cladistics 14: 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke, G., 1997. Ultrastructure of the nuchal organs in polychaetes (Annelida). New results and review. Acta zool. 78: 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. A., 1987. Reproductive biology, systematics and evolution in the polychaete family Alciopidae. Bull. biol. Soc. Wash. 7: 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. E., 1965. The biology and morphology of the pelagic annelid Poeobius meseres Heath. J. Zool. Lond. 146: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G. W. & K. Fauchald, 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scr.26: 139–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G. W. & F. Pleijel, 2001. Polychaetes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 354 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, M., 1835. Beskrivelser og iagttagelser over nogle mærkelige eller nye i havet ved den Bergenske kyst levende dyr af polypernes, acelephernes, radiaternes, annelidernes og molluskernes classer, med en kort oversigt over de hidtil af forfattaren sammesteds fundne arter og deres forekommen. Bergen. 81 pp.

  • Schmidt, E. O., 1848. Neue Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Würmer gesammelt auf einer Reise nach den Färor im Frühjahr 1848. Friedrich Mauke, Jena. 44 pp.

  • Sharov, A. G., 1966. Basic Arthropodan Stock, with Special Reference to Insects. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 271 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, V., 1968. Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der segmentalen Muskelsysteme und zur Verwandtschaft der Polychaeten-Familien. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 63: 251–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedmark, B., 1959. Archiannelides Nerillidae des cotes du Finistere. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 98: 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschakov, P. V., 1972. Polychaeta 1. Polychaetes of the sub-order Phyllodociforma of the Polar Basin and the north-western part of the Pacific (translated from Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem 1974). Fauna SSSR 102: 1–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., (1967) Monographie der Gattungen Hesionides Friedrich und Microphthalmus Mecznikow (Polychaeta, Hesionidae). Z. Morph. Tiere 61: 1–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1990. Synopses British Fauna (New Series) No. 44 Polychaetes: Interstitial families. Universal Book Services/ Dr. W. Backhuys, Oegstgeest. 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1997. The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J. nat. Hist. Lond. 31: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., D. McHugh, G. Purschke & G. W. Rouse, 1999. Systematization of the Annelida: different approaches. Hydrobiologia 402: 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, P. S., 1984. Chapter 59. Family A. In Uebelacker, J. M. & P. G. Johnson (eds), Taxonomic Guide to the Polychaetes of the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Vol. 7. Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. Mobile, Alabama: 59-1 to 59–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, P. S., 1987. Aberrantidae: a new family of Polychaeta (Annelida). Bull. biol. Soc. Wash. 7: 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B.-L. & H. Lu, 1994. Phylogeny of Alciopidae (pelagic polychaetes): a cladistic analysis. Mém. Mus. natn. D'hist. nat. 162: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Australian Museum, Nth Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia

    Greg W. Rouse

  2. Environmental Biology, The University of Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    Greg W. Rouse

  3. Département Systématique et évolution, ESA CNRS 8044, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231, Paris Cedex 05, France

    Fredrik Pleijel

Authors
  1. Greg W. Rouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fredrik Pleijel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rouse, G.W., Pleijel, F. Problems in polychaete systematics. Hydrobiologia 496, 175–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026188630116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026188630116

Search

Navigation