Is dimethylsulfoxide a reliable solvent for extracting chlorophyll under field conditions?
Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) appears to be a reliable solvent for extracting chlorophyll (Chl), however, modification of standard methods may be necessary for some species under field conditions. We found that Chl extraction of whole leaf tissue with DMSO incubated at between 25 and 40 °C was generally similar to the 80% acetone method, except for one graminoid species that required maceration. There was little effect of incubation temperature or duration of incubation beyond 7 h on extraction efficiency, but DMSO extracts were less stable than acetone extracts during one week of cold storage, especially if they thawed during this period. Since Chl extraction methods may provide variable results, particularly in the field, studies using different solvents should be compared cautiously unless specific methods have been calibrated.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Garcia AL and Nicolas N (1998a) Establishing errors in the spectrophotometric determination of chlorophylls using different solvents. J Plant Physiol 152: 392-398Google Scholar
- Hik DS, McColl C and Boonstra R (2001) Why are Arctic ground squirrels more stressed in the boreal forest than in alpine meadows? EcoScience 8: 275-288Google Scholar
- Hiscox JD and Israelstam GF (1979) A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot 57: 1332-1334Google Scholar
- Porra RJ, Thompson WA and Kriedmann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: Verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975: 384-394Google Scholar
- Scott BJ and Robson AD (1991) Assessment of dimethyl-sulfoxide as a chlorophyll extractant and for the partitioning of magnesium. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22: 701-711Google Scholar
- Shinano T, Lei TT, Kawamukai T, Inoue MT, Koike T and Tadano T (1996) Dimethylsulfoxide method for the extraction of chlorophylls a and b from the leaves of wheat, field bean, dwarf bamboo, and oak. Photosynthetica 32: 409-415Google Scholar
- Spencer DF and Ksander GG (1987) Comparison of thee methods for extracting chlorophyll from aquatic macrophytes. J Freshwater Ecol 4: 201-208Google Scholar
- Speziale BJ, Scheiner SP, Giammatteo PA and Schindler JE (1984) Comparison of N,N-dimethylformadide, dimethylsulfoxide, and acetone for extraction of phytoplankton chlorophyll. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41: 1519-1522Google Scholar
- Stauffer RE, Lee GF and Armstrong DE (1979) Estimating chlorophyll extraction biases. J Fish Res Board Can 36: 152-157Google Scholar
- Tait MA (2002) The effects of climate change and herbivory on alpine plants in the southwest Yukon. MSc Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Thayer SS and Björkman O (1990) Leaf xanthopyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC. Photosynth Res 23: 331-343Google Scholar
- Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144: 307-313Google Scholar
- Yoder BJ and Daley LS (1989) Development of a visible spectroscopic method for determining chlorophyll a and b in vivo in leaf samples. Spectroscopy 8: 44-50Google Scholar