Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic analysis of conservation zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats – An ecological hotspot, Tamil Nadu, India

Biodiversity & Conservation volume 12, pages 2331–2359 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

This study highlights spatial characterization of evergreen forests of the Western Ghats – an ecological hotspot in Tamil Nadu, India – using remote sensing and GIS-based analysis in conjunction with ground-based phytosociological data. The evergreen forests of Tamil Nadu are distributed in four distinct hill ranges, Nilgiri, Anamalai, Palni and Tirunelveli, having different topographic, bioclimatic and disturbance levels. The evergreen forests in these four hill ranges are characterized for their uniqueness in terms of patch characteristics and phytosociology. A vegetation type map was prepared using IRS LISS III satellite data and was used to study the patch characteristics in terms of patch size, number, shape, porosity and landcover diversity (LD). The phytosociological characteristics, namely species richness, diversity, similarity and community assemblages, were studied using ground data collected from 95 sample points of 0.1 ha size. Patch size and number revealed distinct intactness and disturbance levels in these four hill ranges. Evergreen forests in the Tirunelveli hills comprising 216.09 km2 are distributed in 306 patches, and in the Palni hills, with 285 km2, forests are distributed in 1029 patches, indicating a high level of fragmentation. LD, indicating the spatial heterogeneity of landcover, was very high in the Nilgiri hills and low in the Tirunelveli hills. The spatial analysis helped to delineate homogenous large patches of evergreen forest, which can be adopted for appropriate conservation strategies. A total of 342 tree species belonging to 4490 stems were evaluated for phytosociology. Only 15–28% of similarity in terms of species distribution was found across the hill ranges. Conjunctive analysis of patch characteristics and species distribution showed high species richness in less fragmented evergreen forests and vice versa. The study identified the areas of prioritization in terms of ecorestoration and conservation based on patch and phytosociological characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

References

  • Ahmedullah M. andNayar M.P. 1987. Endemic Plants of the Indian Region. Vol. 1. Botanical Survey India, Calcutta, India.

  • Arnold G.W. and Weeldenburg J.R. 1990. Factors determining the number and species of birds in road verges in the wheatbelt of Western Australia. Biological Conservation 53: 295-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyappan N. and Parthasarathy N. 1999. Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large-scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagalaiar, Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1533-1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner S.M. 1989. Species composition in gaps and structure of a tropical forest. Ecology 70: 538-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett M.R., August P.V., Brown J.H. Jr. and Taylor S.J. 1983. The structure and composition of a wooden urban ravine ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 1392-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Press, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara U.M. and Ramakrishnan P.S. 1994. Vegetation and gap dynamics of a tropical wet evergreen forest in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 337-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783-791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. 1997. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User's Guide and Application. Published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

  • Curtis J.T. and McIntosh R.P. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31: 434-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debinski D.M., Ray C. and Saveraid E.H. 2001. Species diversity and the scale of the landscape mosaic: do scales of movement and patch size affect diversity? Biological Conservation 98: 179-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devy M.S. and Davidar P. 2001. Response of wet forest butterflies to selective logging in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve: implication for conservation. Current Science 80: 400-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt S. 2001. Beyond 2000: a management vision for the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve. Current Science 80: 442-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt C.B.S., Srivastava V.K., Ranganath B.K., Murthy M.S.R., Jha C.S., Ravan S.A. et al. 2002. Western Ghats biodiversity assessment at landscape level using remote sensing and GIS. A special issue on biodiversity. NNRMS Bulletin (B) 27: 49-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt C.B.S. and Udayalakshmi V. 1994. Remote sensing and GIS based inputs-Forest working plan preparations. Technical report. National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina A. 1998. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. and Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J.L., Foster D.R., McLachlan J.S. and Drake N. 1998. Impact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1: 76-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble J.S. and Fischer C.E.C. 1915-1935. Flora of Presidency of Madras. Vol. 1-3. Adlard and Son Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh T. and Davidar P. 2001. Dispersal modes of tree species in the wet forests of southern Western Ghats. Current Science 80: 394-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harish R.B. and Utkarsh G. 1999. Herb species diversity of Western Ghats. In: Biodiversity of the Western Ghats Complex of Karnataka. Biodiversity Initiative Trust, Mangalore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry A.N., Chandrabose M., Swaminathan M.S. and Nair N.C. 1984. Agasthyamalai and its environs: a potential area for Biosphere Reserve. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 81: 282-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry A.N., Kumari G.R. and Chitra V. 1987. Flora of Tamilnadu, India Ser. 1: Analysis. Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.J. 1987. Disturbance regimes in remnants of natural vegetation. In: Saunders D.A., Burbidge A.A. and Hopkins A.J.M. (eds), Natural Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, Australia, pp. 233-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.J. and Huenneke L.F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha C.S., Dutt C.B.S. and Bawa K.S. 2000. Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Current Science79: 231-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsingh A.J.T. 2001The Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve: a global heritage of biological diversity. Current Science 80: 378-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa J. and Rickett S.T.A. 1991. Ecological Heterogeneity. Ecological Studies 86. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy R.S. and Kiester A.R. 1998. Analysis of lion-tailed macaque habitat fragmentation using satellite imagery. Current Science 75: 283-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGro J. 1991. Assessing patch shape in landscape mosaics. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57: 285-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapin M. and Barnes B.V. 1995. Using the landscape ecosystem approach to assess species and ecosystem diversity. Conservation Biology 9: 1148-1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver C.J. and Haine-Young R.H. 1993. Equilibrium landscapes and their aftermath: spatial hetero-geneity and the role of the new technology. In: Haines-Young R., Green D.R. and Cousins S. (eds), Landscape Ecology and Geographic Information Systems. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 57-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele S., Rajashekar G., Venkataramana R.H., Prevish Kumar G. and Sarvanakumar P. 1998. Meso-scale analysis of forest condition and its determinants: a case study from the Western Ghats region, India. Current Science 75: 256-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R. 1984. Parks: how big is big enough? Science 225: 611-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman D., Lieberman M., Peralta R. and Hartshorn G.S. 1996. Tropical forest structure and composition on a large-scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 84: 137-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy T.E., Bierregaard R., Ryland A.B., Malcolm J.R., Quitela C.E., Harper L.H. et al. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Soul'e M. (ed.), Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 257-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy T.E., Rankin J.M., Bierregaard R.O. Jr., Brown K.S. Jr., Emmons L.M. and Van der Voort M.E. 1984.Ecosystem decay of Amazon forest remnants. In: Nitecki M.H. (ed.), Extinctions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 295-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J.A. and Reynolds J.F. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer of Methods and Computing. Wiley Press, New York, 337 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manokaran N. and Kochummen K.M. 1987. Recruitment, growth and mortality of tree species in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 3: 315-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew K.M. 1999. The Flora of Palni Hills. Vol. 1-3. The Swedish International Development Authority, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1994. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Department of Forest Science, Dolores, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam G.K., Henein K. and Smith S.K. 1991. Landscape dynamics models. In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 399-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B. and Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H. 2001a. Incorporating landscape transformation into local conservation prioritization: a case study in the Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 353-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H. 2001b. Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity: a review article.International Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 2377-2400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H. and Gadgil M. 1998. Linking regional and landscape scales for assessing biodiversity: a case study from Western Ghats. Current Science 75: 264-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair N.C. and Henry A.N. 1983. Flora of Tamilnadu, Ser. 1: Analysis.Vol. 1. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar M.P. 1996. Hot spots of Endemic plants of India, Nepal and Bhutan. Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, India, 252 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar M.P. 1989. In situ conservation of wild flora resources. Bulletin of the Botanical Survey of India 29: 319-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery D.Mc.C., Campbell E.J.F., Lee Y.F., Ridsdale C.E. and Still M.J. 1992. Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum valley, Sabah, Malaysia: structure, relative abundance and family composition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 335: 341-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols W.F., Killingbeck K.T. and August P.V. 1998. The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity. II. A landscape perspective. Conservation Biology 12: 371-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson D.I. 1965. A study of virgin rain forest near Sandakan, North Borneo. Proceedings of the Symposium of Ecological Research into Humid Tropics Vegetation, Kuching. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 67-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill R.V., Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., Jackson B., DeAngelis D.L. et al. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation; a review of hoarctic breedings birds studies. Landscape Ecology 5: 93-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parresol B.R. and McCollum J. 1997. Characterizing and comparing landscape diversity using GIS and a contagion index. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 5: 249-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy N. 1999. Tree diversity and distribution in undisturbed and human-impacted sites of tropical wet evergreen forest in southern Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1365-1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy N. 2001. Changes in forest composition and structure in three sites of tropical evergreen forest around Sengaltheri, Western Ghats. Current Science 80: 389-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy N. and Karthikeyan R. 1997. Biodiversity and population density of woody species in a tropical evergreen forest in courtallum reserve forest, Western Ghats, India. Tropical Ecology 38: 297-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. 1982a. Bioclimates of the Western Ghats at 1/ 500000 (2 sheets). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

  • Pascal J.P. 1982b. Forest Map of South India, Mercara-Mysore at 1:250000 (Sheet 3). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. 1982c. Forest Map of South India, Shimoga at 1:250000 (Sheet 2). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. 1984. Forest Map of South India, Belgaum-Dharwar-Panaji at 1:250000 (Sheet 1). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. and Pelissier R. 1996. Structure and floristic composition of a tropical evergreen forest in south-west India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 191-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. and Ramesh B.R. 1987. A field key to the Trees and Lianas of Evergreen Forest of the Western Ghats (India). Travaux de la Section Scientilique et Technique Tome XXIII. Institut Français de Pondichérry, Pondichérry, India.

  • Pearson J.E. 1993. Complex patterns in a simple system. Science 261: 189-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelissier R. 1998. Tree spatial patterns in three contrasting plots of a southern Indian tropical moist evergreen forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelissier R. and Goreaud F. 2001. A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 99-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D.P.C. and Goslee S.C. 2001. Landscape diversity. In: Levin S.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, pp. 645-658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A. and Thompson J.N. 1978. Patch dynamics and the size of natural reserves. Biological Conservation 13: 27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt W.J. 1975. The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecological Monographs 45: 285-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad S.N., Vijayan L., Balachandran S., Ramachandran V.S. and Verghese C.P.A. 1998. Conservation Planning for the Western Ghats of Kerala: I. A GIS approach for location of biodiversity hotspots. Current Science 75: 211-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor J., Anderson J.M., Chai P. and Vallack H.W. 1983. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. I-Forest environment structure and floristics. Journal of Ecology 71: 237-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh B.R., De Franceschi D. and Pascal J.P. 1997. Forest Map of South India, Thiruvanthapuram- Tirunelveli at 1:250000 (Sheet 6). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

  • Ramesh B.R. and Pascal J.P. 1997. Atlas of Endemics of the Western Ghats (India). Institut Français, Pondichérry, India.

  • Ritters K.H., O'Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins S.P. et al. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52: 199-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme W.H. and Knight D.H. 1982. Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone park. Bioscience 32: 664-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmenta-tion. Conservation Biology 5: 18-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. 1995. STATISTICA 5.0 for Windows. Computer Program Manual. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarayalu S. and Velmurugan S. 1999. Endangered Plant Species of Tamil Nadu. Bharathi Computers & Offset, Dindigul, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R., Dattaraja H.S., Suresh H.S., Radhakrishnan J.V., Vasudeva R., Nirmala S. et al. 1992. Long-term monitoring of vegetation in a tropical deciduous forest in Mudumalai, Southern India. Current Science 62: 608-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R., Suresh H.S., Dattaraja H.S. and Joshi N.V. 1998. Dynamics of a tropical dry deciduous forest: population changes (1998 through 1993) in a 50-ha plot at Mudumalai, southern India. In: Dallmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modelling Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, pp. 529-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingland I.R. and Greenwood P.J. (eds) 1983. The Ecology of Animal Movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner I.M. and Corlett R.T. 1996. The conservation value of small isolated fragmentation of lowland tropical rainforest. Tree 11: 330-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern of process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udayalakshmi V., Murthy M.S.R. and Dutt C.B.S. 1998. Efficient forest resources management through GIS and remote sensing. Current Science 75: 272-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulh C. and Murphy P.G. 1981. Composition, structure and regeneration of a tierra firme forest in the Amazon basin of Venezuela. Tropical Ecology 22: 219-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R., Balslev H. and Mino G.C.P.Y. 1994. High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 21-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Mono-graphs 30: 279-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore T.C. 1975. Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 282 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D., Wade T.G., Jones K.B., Ritters K.H. and O'Neill R.V. 1995. Diversity of ecological communities of the United States. Vegetatio 119: 91-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385-397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Agency, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500 037, India

    G. Amarnath, M.S.R. Murthy, G. Rajashekar & C.B.S. Dutt

  2. Centre for Natural Resources Study, St. Joseph's college, Tiruchirappalli, 620 002, India

    S.J. Britto

Authors
  1. G. Amarnath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.S.R. Murthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S.J. Britto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Rajashekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C.B.S. Dutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.S.R. Murthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amarnath, G., Murthy, M., Britto, S. et al. Diagnostic analysis of conservation zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats – An ecological hotspot, Tamil Nadu, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2331–2359 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025858713716

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025858713716

  • Conservation zones
  • Evergreen forest
  • Landcover diversity
  • Patch characterization
  • Species diversity
  • Western Ghats

Search

Navigation