The effect of conducting a lottery on questionnaire response rates: A randomised controlled trial
- 86 Downloads
Aim: To study the effect of a lottery incentive on questionnaire response rate. Material and methods: In Copenhagen County, Denmark, a random sample of 2543 men and women between the ages of 19 and 60 were randomised into a control group and an intervention group. Both groups were contacted by mail and asked to complete a questionnaire on sociodemografic characteristics, self-rated health and self-reported physical activity level. The intervention group was offered participation in a small lottery for returning the questionnaire. No incentive was offered to the control group. Main results: The final response rate for the control group was 60.4 and 63.4% for the intervention group. Although the response rate was significantly higher in the intervention group after 2 and 3 weeks, the difference in the final response rate between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in sociodemografic characteristics, self-rated health or self-reported physical activity level. Conclusion: A lottery incentive had no significant effect on the overall response rate, but may have contributed to a quicker response. Furthermore a lottery incentive did not seem to alter the selection of respondents.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Johansson L, Solvoll K, Opdahl S, Bjorneboe GE, Drevon CA. Response rates with different distribution methods and reward, and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51: 346–352.Google Scholar
- 2.Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomised study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 1117–1122.Google Scholar
- 3.Marret LD, Kreiger N, Dodds L, Hilditch S. The effect on response rates of offering a small incentive with mailed questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 1992; 2: 745–753.Google Scholar
- 4.Clark TJ, Khan KS, Gupta JK. Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the Response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Commun. Health 2001; 55: 595–596.Google Scholar
- 5.Roberts PJ, Roberts C, Sibbald B, Torgerson DJ. The effect of a direct payment or a lottery on questionnaire response rates: A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2000; 54: 71–72.Google Scholar
- 6.Picavet HJS. National health surveys by mail or home interview: Effects on response. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2001; 55: 408–413.Google Scholar