Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 267–277 | Cite as

Levels of host plant resistance to banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in African Musa germplasm

  • Andrew Kiggundu
  • Clifford S. Gold
  • Maryke T. Labuschagne
  • Dirk Vuylsteke
  • Schalk Louw
Article

Abstract

Forty-five Musa clones, including endemic and introduced cultivars plus hybrids, were evaluated for resistance against the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus, in a field trial in Uganda. The predominant groups of staple crops, East African highland bananas (Musa spp. AAA) and plantains (Musaspp. AAB), as well as plantain-derived hybrids (AAB × AA), showed the highest levels of susceptibility to this pest. These were followed by dessert bananas (Musa spp. AAA), exotic bananas (Musa spp. ABB) and finally diploids of M. acuminata (AA). Hybrids of banana origin were highly resistant. Some East African highland cultivars, especially brewing types (e.g., Kabula, Bagandeseza, Ediirira), showed intermediate levels of resistance. Among the non-highland bananas, high levels of resistance were observed in Yangambi-Km5 (AAA), Cavendish (AAA), Gros Michel (AAA), Kayinja (ABB, Pisang Awak subgroup), Ndiizi (AB, Ney Poovan subgroup)and Kisubi (Ney Poovan subgroup). The highest resistance was observed in banana hybrids TMB2×7197-2, TMB2×8075-7 and the wild banana Calcutta-4 (AA). These were considered the best sources of resistance for a weevil resistance-breeding programme with the two hybrids commonly used as improved male parents.

cluster analysis Cosmopolites sordidus host plant Musa principal component analysis resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldenderfer, M.S. & Blasfield, 1984. Cluster Analysis, Sage University Papers, Sage Publications California, USA, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Anitha, N., L. Rajamony & T.C. Radhakrishnan, 1996. Reaction of banana clones against major biotic stresses. The Planter 72: 315-321.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous, 1989. Guia Educativa No. 1: Trampeo para el picudo negro en platano. FHIA. La Lima, Honduras, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  4. de Ponti, O.M.B., 1982. Plant resistance to insects: a challenge to plant breeders and entomologists. In: Proc 5th Int Symp on Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 337-347. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Fogain, R. & N.S. Price, 1994. Varietal screening of some Musa cultivars for susceptibility to the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Fruits 49: 247-251.Google Scholar
  6. Gold, C.S., B. Pinese & J.E. Pena, 2002. Pests of banana. In: J.E. Pena, J. Sharp & M. Wysoki (Eds.), Pests and Pollinators of Tropical Fruit, pp. 13-56. CABI International, Wallingord, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. Gold, C.S., G. Night, P.R. Speijer, A.M.K. Abera & N.D.T.M. Rukazambuga, 1998. Hot-water treatment for control of banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Uganda. Afr Entomol 6: 215-221.Google Scholar
  8. Gold, C.S., E.B. Karamura, A. Kiggundu, F. Bagamba & A.M.K. Abera, 1999. Geographic shifts in highland cooking banana (Musa spp., group AAA-EA) production in Uganda. Int J Sust Devel World Ecol 6: 45-59.Google Scholar
  9. Gold, C.S., P.R. Speijer, E.B. Karamura & N.D.T.M. Rukazambuga, 1994. Assessment of banana weevils in East African highland banana systems and strategies for control. In: R.V. Valmayor, R.G. Davide, J.M. Stanton, N.L. Treverrow & V.N Roa (Eds.), Banana Nematodes and Weevil Borers in Asia and the Pacific, pp. 170-190. INIBAP, Los Banoss, Philippines.Google Scholar
  10. Gold, C.S., S.H. Okech, E.B. Karamura and R. Ssendege, 1997. Banana weevil population and related damage in Ntungamo and Mbarara districts, Uganda. In: E. Adipala (Ed.), African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, pp. 1207-1219. African Crop Science Society, Kampala, Uganda.Google Scholar
  11. INIBAP, 2001. Networking Banana and Plantain: INIBAP Annual Report 2000. International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  12. Karamura, D.A., 1998. Numerical taxonomic studies of the East African Highland Bananas (Musa EAHB, AAA-East Africa) in Uganda. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading, U.K., 344 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Kiggundu, A., 2000. Host-Plant Interactions and Resistance Mechanisms to Banana Weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (germar) in Ugandan Musa Germplasm. M.Sc. Thesis. University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontain, South Africa, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Kiggundu, A., D. Vuylsteke & C.S. Gold, 1999. Recent advances in host plant resistance to banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) In: E.A. Frison, C.S. Gold, E.B. Karamura & R.A. Sikora (Eds.), Mobilizing IPM for Sustainable Banana Production in Africa Proceedings of a workshop on Banana IPM held in Nelspruit, South Africa, 23-28 November 1998, pp. 87-96. INIBAP, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  15. Lemaire, L., 1996. Les relations sémiochimiques chez le charançon du bananier Cosmopolites sordidus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) et la resistance de sa plante-hôte, le bananier. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montpellier II, France, 268 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Mbwana, A.S.S. & N.D.T.M. Rukazambuga, 1999. Banana IPM in Tanzania. In: E. Frison, C.S. Gold, E.B. Karamura & R.A. Sikora (Eds.), Mobilizing IPM for Sustainable Banana Production in Africa. Proc Workshop on Banana IPM held in Nelspruit, South Africa, 23-28 November 1998, pp. 237-245. INIBAP. Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  17. Mesquita, A.L.M., E.J. Alves & R.C. Caldas. 1984. Resistance of banana cultivars to Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar 1824). Fruits 39: 254-257.Google Scholar
  18. Mitchell, G., 1978. The estimation of banana borer population and resistance levels. Windward Banana Research and Development Technical Bulletin 2. St. Lucia, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Ortiz, R., R.S.B. Ferris & D. Vuylsteke, 1995a. Banana and plantain breeding. In: S. Gowen (Ed.), Bananas and Plantains, pp. 110-146. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Ortiz, R., D, Vuylsteke, B. Dumpe & R.S.B. Ferris, 1995b. Banana weevil resistance and corm hardness in Musa germplasm. Euphytica 86: 95-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostmark, H.E., 1974. Economic insect pests of bananas. Ann Rev Entomol 19: 161-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pathak, R.S., 1991. Plant Genetics in pest management. Insect Sci Appl 12: 553-564.Google Scholar
  23. Pavis, C. & L. Lemaire, 1997. Resistance of Musa germplasm to the banana borer weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Infomusa 5: 3-9.Google Scholar
  24. Rajamony, L., N. Anitha, T.C. Radkhakrishnan & K.C. George, 1995. Variability of yield and yield components in the ABB group of bananas. The Planter 71: 161-168.Google Scholar
  25. Rajamony, L., K.C. George, N. Anitha & T.C. Radhakrishnan. 1993. Stability and adaptation of banana clones belong to AAA group. The Planter 69: 343-353.Google Scholar
  26. Rajamony, L., K.C. George, N. Anitha & T.C. Radhakrishnan. 1994. Assesment of banana (Musa × paradiaca) clones of AAB group based on stability and adoption. Indian J Agric Sci 64: 521-526.Google Scholar
  27. Rukazambuga, N.D.T.M., C.S. Gold & S.R. Gowen, 1998. Yield loss in East African Highland Banana (Musa spp., AAA-EA group) caused by the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus Germar. Crop Prot 17: 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SAS Institute Inc., 1991. Cary, NC, U.S.A. Software Release 6.10 TS019.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, M.F., 1990. A multivariate approach to a specific problem of grouping maize cultivars. SA J Plant & Soil 7: 167-171.Google Scholar
  30. Sponagel, K.W., F.J. Diaz & A. Cribas, 1995. El picudo negro del platano, Cosmopolites sordidus Germar, FHIA. La Lima, Honduras, 35 pp + plates.Google Scholar
  31. Vuylsteke, D., R. Ortiz, R.S.B. Ferris & J.H. Crouch, 1997. Plantain improvement. Plant Breed Rev 14: 267-320.Google Scholar
  32. Yost, D. & H. Eswaran, 1990. Major land resource areas of Uganda. In: World Soil Resources. SMSS, USAID, Washington-D.C., USA, 218 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Kiggundu
    • 1
  • Clifford S. Gold
    • 2
  • Maryke T. Labuschagne
    • 3
  • Dirk Vuylsteke
    • 2
  • Schalk Louw
    • 3
  1. 1.Kawanda Agricultural Research InstituteKampalaUganda
  2. 2.IITA-ESARCKampalaUganda
  3. 3.University of the Orange Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations