Abstract
The ideal scalar Aharonov–Bohm (SAB) and Aharonov–Casher (AC) effect involve a magnetic dipole pointing in a certain fixed direction: along a purely time dependent magnetic field in the SAB case and perpendicular to a planar static electric field in the AC case. We extend these effects to arbitrary direction of the magnetic dipole. The precise conditions for having nondispersive precession and interference effects in these generalized set ups are delineated both classically and quantally. Under these conditions the dipole is affected by a nonvanishing torque that causes pure precession around the directions defined by the ideal set ups. It is shown that the precession angles are in the quantal case linearly related to the ideal phase differences, and that the nonideal phase differences are nonlinearly related to the ideal phase differences. It is argued that the latter nonlinearity is due to the appearance of a geometric phase associated with the nontrivial spin path. It is further demonstrated that the spatial force vanishes in all cases except in the classical treatment of the nonideal AC set up, where the occurring force has to be compensated by the experimental arrangement. Finally, for a closed space-time loop the local precession effects can be inferred from the interference pattern characterized by the nonideal phase differences and the visibilities. It is argued that this makes it natural to regard SAB and AC as essentially local and nontopological effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory”, Phys. Rev. 115(3), 485–491 (1959).
A. S. Goldhaber, “Comment on topological quantum effects for neutral particles”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62(4), 482(1989).
M. Peshkin and H. J. Lipkin, “Topology, locality, and Aharonov–Bohm effect with neutrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(15), 2847–2850 (1995).
M. Peshkin, “Force-free interactions and nondispersive phase shifts in interferometry,” Found. Phys. 29(3), 481–489 (1999).
A. Zeilinger, “Generalized Aharonov–Bohm experiments with neutrons”, in Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory, V. Gorini and A. Frigerio, eds. (NATO ASI Series B, Vol. 144, Plenum, New York, 1986), p. 311.
Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, “Topological quantum effects for neutral particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(4), 319–321 (1984).
B. E. Allman, A. Cimmino, A. G. Klein, G. I. Opat, H. Kaiser, and S. A. Werner, “Scalar Aharonov–Bohm experiment with neutrons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(16), 2409–2412 (1992).
B. E. Allman, A. Cimmino, A. G. Klein, G. I. Opat, H. Kaiser, and S. A. Werner, “Observation of the scalar Aharonov–Bohm effect by neutron interferometry,” Phys. Rev. A 48(3), 1799–1807 (1993).
B. E. Allman, W.-T. Lee, O. I. Motrunich, and S. A. Werner, “Scalar Aharonov–Bohm effect with longitudinally polarized neutrons”, Phys. Rev. A 60(6), 4272–4284 (1999).
A. Cimmino, G. I. Opat, A. G. Klein, H. Kaiser, S. A. Werner, M. Arif, and R. Clothier, “Observation of the topological Aharonov–Casher phase shift by neutron interferometry”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63(4), 380–383 (1989).
G. Badurek, H. Weinfurter, R. Gähler, A. Kollmar, S. Wehinger, and A. Zeilinger, “Nondispersive phase of the Aharonov–Bohm effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71(3), 307–311 (1993).
K. Sangster, E. A. Hinds, S. M. Barnett, E. Riis, and A. G. Sinclair, “Measurement of the Aharonov–Casher phase in an atomic system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71(22), 3641–3644 (1993).
K. Sangster, E. A. Hinds, S. M. Barnett, E. Riis, and A. G. Sinclair, “Aharonov–Casher phase in an atomic system”, Phys. Rev. A 51(3), 1776–1786 (1995).
A. Görlitz, B. Schuh, and A. Weis, “Measurement of the Aharonov–Casher phase of aligned Rb atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 51(6), R4305-R4308 (1995).
H. Rauch and S. A. Werner, Neutron Interferometry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
J. P. Dowling, C. P. Williams, and J. D. Franson, “Maxwell duality, Lorentz invariance, and topological phase,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(13), 2486–2489 (1999).
X.-G. He and B. H. J. McKellar, “Topological phase due to electric dipole moment and magnetic monopole interaction,” Phys. Rev. A 47(4), 3424–3425 (1993).
M. Wilkens, “Quantum phase of a moving dipole”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72(1), 5–8 (1994).
Y. D. Han and I. G. Koh, “Topological nature of the Aharonov–Casher effect,” Phys. Lett. A 167, 341–344 (1992).
E. Sjöqvist, “Anandan–Aharonov–Casher oscillations in a simply connected region”, Phys. Lett. A 270, 10–13 (2000).
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1975).
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1980), p. 232.
W. Pauli, “Relativistic field theories of elementary particles,” Rev. Modern Phys. 13(3), 203–232 (1941).
L. L. Foldy, “The electromagnetic properties of Dirac particles,” Phys. Rev. 87(5), 688–693 (1952).
J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1964), p. 8.
J. Anandan, “Electromagnetic effects in the quantum interference of dipoles,” Phys. Lett. A 138, 347–352 (1989).
X.-G. He and B. H. J. McKellar, “The topological phase of the Aharonov–Casher effect and the anyon behaviour of charged particles in 2+1 dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 256, 250–254 (1991).
C. R. Hagen, “Exact equivalence of spin-1/2 Aharonov–Bohm and Aharonov–Casher effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(20), 2347–2349 (1990).
S. Pancharatnam, “Generalized theory of interference, and its applications,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 44, 247–262 (1956).
A. G. Wagh and V. C. Rakhecha, “On measuring the Pancharatnam phase. I. Interferometry”, Phys. Lett. A 197, 107–111 (1995).
A. G. Wagh, V. C. Rakhecha, P. Fischer, and A. Ioffe, “Neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phase”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(10), 1992–1995 (1998).
Y. Aharonov and B. Reznik, “Complementarity between local and nonlocal topological effects”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(21), 4790–4793 (2000).
P. Hyllus and E. Sjöqvist, “Comment on complementarity between local and nonlocal topological effects”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(19), 198901(2002).
Y. Aharonov and B. Reznik, “Reply to comment on complementarity between local and nonlocal topological effects”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 198902(2002).
A. G. Wagh and V. C. Rakhecha, “Electromagnetic acceleration of neutrons and its observability”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(8), 1399–1403 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hyllus, P., Sjöqvist, E. Precession and Interference in the Aharonov–Casher and Scalar Aharonov–Bohm Effects. Foundations of Physics 33, 1085–1105 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025637918269
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025637918269