Sex Roles

, Volume 37, Issue 5–6, pp 295–317 | Cite as

“Subordination” and Nonverbal Sensitivity: A Study and Synthesis of Findings Based on Trait Measures

  • Judith A. Hall
  • Amy G. Halberstadt
  • Christopher E. O'Brien


We conducted a primary study and a meta-analysis on the relation of trait “subordination” measures to trait measures of sensitivity to nonverbal cues, in order to test the hypothesis that more subordinate individuals have enhanced ability to decode nonverbal cues. In the primary study, subordination measures included socioeconomic background, two dominance scales, a capacity for status scale, a control by powerful others scale, self-ratings of leadership and social status in high school, and for women, measures of sex role values. Sensitivity to nonverbal cues was measured using three psychometric tests, Results showed little overall support for the subordination hypothesis, and some results were significantly opposite to the prediction. The meta-analysis showed that dominance, capacity for status, socioeconomic status, and women's sex role values all had relations to nonverbal sensitivity that were opposite to the predictions of the subordination hypothesis. Future prospects for the subordination hypothesis with respect to nonverbal sensitivity are discussed.


High School Socioeconomic Status Social Psychology Social Status Primary Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez, G., & Fuentes, P. (1994). Recognition of facial expression in diverging socioeconomic levels. Brain and Cognition, 25, 235–239.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263–287.Google Scholar
  4. Bernieri, F. J. (1991). Interpersonal sensitivity in teaching interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 98–103.Google Scholar
  5. Buck, R. (1976). A test of nonverbal receiving ability: Preliminary studies. Human Communication Research, 2, 162–171.Google Scholar
  6. Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Buller, D. B., & Aune, R. K. (1988). The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A speech accommodation theory explanation. Human Communication Research, 14, 301–322.Google Scholar
  8. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1986). The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A replication and extension. Human Communication Research, 13, 126–144.Google Scholar
  9. Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The Interpersonal Perception Task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 225–245.Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, F. M. (1990). Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of role on smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 531–540.Google Scholar
  11. DiMatteo, M. R., & Hall, J. A. (1979). Nonverbal decoding skill and attention to nonverbal cues: A research note. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 188–192.Google Scholar
  12. DiMatteo, M. R., Hayes, R. D., & Prince, L. M. (1986). Relationship of physicians' nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychology, 5, 581–594.Google Scholar
  13. Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.Google Scholar
  14. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.Google Scholar
  15. Frieze, I. H., & Ramsey, S. J. (1976). Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 133–141.Google Scholar
  16. Funder, D. C., & Harris, M. J. (1986). On the several facets of personality assessment: The case of social acuity. Journal of Personality, 54, 528–550.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halberstadt, A. G., & Saitta, M. B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257–272.Google Scholar
  20. Halberstadt, A. G., Dovidio, J. F., & Davidson, L. A. (1988, October). Power, gender, and smiling. Paper presented at the Society for Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, J. A. (1980). Voice tone and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 924–934.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1981). Sex roles and nonverbal communication skills. Sex Roles, 7, 273–287.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1994). “Subordination” and sensitivity to nonverbal cues: A study of married working women. Sex Roles, 31, 149–165.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1996). Subordination and nonverbal sensitivity: A hypothesis in search of support. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men, and gender: Ongoing debates. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., Friedman, G. B., & Roter, D. L. (1996). Smiling in relation to manipulated and acquired status. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  29. Hecht, M. A. (1995). The effect of power and gender on smiling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.Google Scholar
  30. Henley, N. M. (1973). Status and sex: Some touching observations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 91–93.Google Scholar
  31. Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Henley, N., & LaFrance, M. (1984). Gender as culture: Difference and dominance in nonverbal behavior. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights. Lewiston, NY: C. J. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, C. (1994). Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations. American Sociological Review, 59, 122–135.Google Scholar
  35. Kombos, N. A., & Fournet, G. P. (1985). Effects of dominance-submissiveness and gender on recognition of nonverbal emotional cues. Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 19–28.Google Scholar
  36. LaFrance, M. (1986). Reading between the lines. Contemporary Psychology, 31, 793–794.Google Scholar
  37. LaFrance, M., & Henley, N. M. (1994). On oppressing hypothesis: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In L. Radtke & H. Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinction within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 377–383.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Patterson, M. L. (1995). A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3–29.Google Scholar
  41. Peplau, L. A. (1976). Impact of fear of success and sex-role attitudes on women's competitive achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 561–568.Google Scholar
  42. Pfaff, P. L. (1954). An experimental study of the communication of feeling without contextual material. Speech Monographs, 21, 155–156.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sabatelli, R. M., Buck, R., & Dreyer, A. (1982). Nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples: Relationship with marital complaints. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1088–1097.Google Scholar
  46. Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  47. Snodgrass, S. E. (1985). Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 146–155.Google Scholar
  48. Snodgrass, S. E. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 154–158.Google Scholar
  49. Snodgrass, S. E., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Interpersonal sensitivity and skills in decoding nonverbal channels: The value of face value. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 243–255.Google Scholar
  50. Snodgrass, S. E., Hecht, M. A., & Ploutz-Snyder, R. J. (1997). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or perceptivity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  51. Vrugt, A., & Kerkstra, A. (1984). Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Semiotica, 50, 1–41.Google Scholar
  52. Weitz, S. (Ed.). (1974). Nonverbal communication: Readings with commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith A. Hall
    • 1
  • Amy G. Halberstadt
    • 2
  • Christopher E. O'Brien
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNortheastern UniversityBoston
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Northeastern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations