Social Indicators Research

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 27–72 | Cite as

Social Indicators Research and Health-Related Quality of Life Research

  • Alex C. Michalos


The aim of this essay is to build a bridgebetween two intersecting areas of research,social indicators research on the one hand andhealth-related quality of life research on theother. The first substantive section of thepaper introduces key concepts and definitionsin the social indicators research tradition,e.g., social indicators, positive, negative,input and output indicators, social reports andquality of life. After that, there is asection reviewing some historical origins andmotives of social indicators researchers,beginning roughly with Jeremy Bentham's`felicific calculus' and ending with the searchfor a comprehensive accounting scheme capableof measuring the quality of human existencewith social, economic and environmentalindicators.Results of eleven surveys are reviewed whichwere undertaken to explain happiness on thebasis of levels of satisfaction thatrespondents got from a dozen specific domainsof their lives, e.g., satisfaction with theirjobs, family relations and health. On average,for the eleven samples, we were able to explain38% of the variance in reported happiness fromsome subset of the predictor variables. Satisfaction with one's own health was never the strongest predictor of happiness inany sample. In five of the eleven samples,satisfaction with one's own health failed toenter the final explanatory regression equationfor lack of statistical significance. Theresults in this section of the essay show thatdifferent groups of people with different lifecircumstances, resources and constraints usedifferent mixtures of ingredients to determinetheir happiness.After examining some research revealing therelative importance of people's satisfaction with their health to theiroverall happiness, I consider some studiesrevealing the importance of people's self-reported health to their overallhappiness. Self-reported health is measuredprimarily by the eight dimensions of SF-36.When a variety of additional potentialpredictors are entered into our regressionequation, 44% of the variance in happinessscores is explained, but only one of the eightdimensions of SF-36 remains, namely, MentalHealth. The latter accounts for a mere four%age points out of the total 44. Thus,self-reported health has relatively little tocontribute toward respondents' reportedhappiness, and its measured contribution issignificantly affected by the number and kindsof potential predictors employed.Two approaches to explaining people'ssatisfaction with their own health areconsidered. First, using the same set ofhealth-related potential predictors of overallhappiness, we are able to explain 56% of thevariance in respondents' satisfaction withtheir own health. Then, using MultipleDiscrepancies Theory, we are able to explainabout 51% of the variation in satisfactionwith one's own health scores for 8,076undergraduates, with highs of 76% for a sampleof Finnish females and 72% for Korean males.Accordingly, it is reasonable to conclude thatif one's aim is to explain people'ssatisfaction with their own health, thepotential predictors assembled in MDT canprovide quite a bit and sometimes even moreexplanatory power than a reasonably broad setof measures of self-reported health.In the penultimate section of the essay it isargued that there are good reasons forcarefully distinguishing ideas of health andquality of life, and for not interpreting SF-36and SIP scores as measures of the quality oflife. It is suggested that we might all bebetter off if the term `health-related qualityof life' is simply abandoned. However, sincethis is unlikely to happen, it is stronglyrecommended that researchers be much morecareful with their usage of the phrase andtheir interpretation of purported measures ofwhatever the phrase is supposed to designate.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allardt, E.: 1975, Att ha, alska, attvara. Om valfard i Norden [Having, Loving, Being. On Welfare in the Nordic Countries] (Borgholm, Argos).Google Scholar
  2. Andorka, R. and István Harcsa: 1990, 'Modernization in Hungary in the long and short run measured by social indicators', Social Indicators Research 23, pp. 1-153.Google Scholar
  3. Andresen, E. M., B. S. Fouts, J. C. Romeis and C. A. Brownson: 1999, 'Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population', Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80, pp. 877-884.Google Scholar
  4. Andresen, E. M., B. M. Rothenberg and R. M. Kaplan: 1998, 'Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults', Medical Care 36(9), pp. 1349-1360.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, F. M.: 1974, 'Social indicators of perceived life quality', Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 279-299.Google Scholar
  6. Andrews, F. M. and S. B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being (Plenum Press, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Argyle, M.: 1987, The Psychology of Happiness (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  8. Bardsley, M. J., S. Astell, A. McCallum and P. D. Home: 1993, 'The performance of three measures of health status in an outpatient diabetes population', Diabetic Medicine 10, pp. 619-626.Google Scholar
  9. Bentham, J.: 1789, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London).Google Scholar
  10. Bergner, M.: 1993, 'Development, testing and use of the Sickness Impact Profile', in S. R. Walker and R. M. Rosser (eds.), Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), pp. 95-110.Google Scholar
  11. Bergner, M., R. A. Bobbitt, W. B. Carter and B. S. Gilson: 1981, 'The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure', Medical Care 19(8), pp. 787-805.Google Scholar
  12. Birnbacher, D.: 1999, 'Quality of life — evaluation or description', Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2(1), pp. 25-36.Google Scholar
  13. Bradburn, N. M. and D. Caplovitz: 1965, Reports of Happiness (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  14. Braybrooke, D.: 1967, 'Skepticism of wants, and certain subversive effects of corporations on American values', in S. Hook (ed.), Human Values and Economic Policy (New York University Press, New York), pp. 224-239.Google Scholar
  15. Bruin, A. F. de, L. P. de Witte, F. Stevens and J. P. M. Diederiks: 1992, 'Sickness Impact Profile: The state of the art of a generic functional status measure', Social Science and Medicine 35(8), pp. 1003-1014.Google Scholar
  16. Brunk, C.: 1987, 'Professionalism and responsibility in the technological society', in D. C. Poff and W. J. Waluchow (eds.), Business Ethics in Canada (Prentice-Hall Canada, Toronto), pp. 60-75.Google Scholar
  17. Bunge, M.: 1961, 'The weight of simplicity in the construction and assaying of scientific theories', Philosophy of Science 28, pp. 120-149.Google Scholar
  18. Cella, D. F. et al.: 1993, 'The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure', Journal of Clinical Oncology 11(3), pp. 570-579.Google Scholar
  19. Churchill, D. N., J. Morgan and G. W. Torrance: 1984, 'Quality of life in end-state renal disease', Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin 4, pp. 20-23.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J.: 1939, Theory of Valuation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  21. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial: 1988, 'Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial', Diabetes Care 11(9), pp. 725-732.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E. and R. E. Lucas: 1999, 'Personality and subjective well-being', in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), pp. 213-229.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E. and R. E. Lucas: 2000, 'Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture and evaluation theory', Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 41-78.Google Scholar
  24. Eiser, C. and J. E. Tooke: 1993, 'Quality-of-life evaluation in diabetes', PharmacoEconomics 4(2), pp. 85-91.Google Scholar
  25. Fairbank, J. C. T. et al.: 1980, 'The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability questionnaire', Physiotherapy 66, pp. 271-273.Google Scholar
  26. Ferriss, A.: 1990, 'Whatever happened, indeed!', Journal of Public Policy 9, pp. 401-405.Google Scholar
  27. Fletcher, A. E., B. M. Hunt and C. J. Bulpitt: 1987, 'Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular disease', Journal of Chronic Diseases 40(6), pp. 557-566.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, K. A.: 1985, Social System Accounts: Linking Social and Economic Indicators Through Tangible Behavior Settings (D. Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
  29. Guyatt, G. H., M. Townsend, L. B. Berman and S. O. Pugsley: 1987, 'Quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation', British Journal of Diseases of the Chest 81, pp. 45-54.Google Scholar
  30. Guyatt, G. H., S. J. O. Veldhuyzen Van Zanten, D. H. Feeny and D. L. Patrick: 1989, 'Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: A taxonomy and review', Canadian Medical Association Journal 140, pp. 1441-1448.Google Scholar
  31. Hagerty, M. R. et al.: 2001, 'Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research', Social Indicators Research 55, pp. 1-96.Google Scholar
  32. Hanestad, B. R.: 1990, 'Errors of measurement affecting the reliability and validity of data acquired from self-assessed quality of life', Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences 4(1), pp. 29-34.Google Scholar
  33. Hörnquist, J. O.: 1989, 'Quality of life: Concept and assessment', Scandanavian Journal of Social Medicine 18, pp. 69-79.Google Scholar
  34. Idler, E. L. and Y. Benyamini: 1997, 'Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies', Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38, pp. 21-37.Google Scholar
  35. Ingersoll, G. M. and D. G. Marrero: 1991, 'A modified quality-of-life measure for youths: Psychometric properties', The Diabetes Educator 17(2), pp. 114-118.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobson, A. M., M. de Groot and J. A. Samson: 1994, 'The evaluation of two measures of quality of life in patients with type I and type II diabetes', Diabetes Care 17(4), pp. 267-274.Google Scholar
  37. James, W.: 1909, The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to Pragmatism (Longmans, Green and Co., New York).Google Scholar
  38. James, W.: 1977 (originally published 1891), 'The moral philosopher and the moral life', in J. J. McDermott (ed.), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 610-629.Google Scholar
  39. Juster, F. T. and K. C. Land: 1981, Social Accounting Systems: Essays on the State of the Art (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  40. Karl, B. D.: 1974, Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  41. Land, K.: 1983, 'Social indicators', Annual Review of Sociology 9, pp. 1-26.Google Scholar
  42. League For Social Reconstruction Research Committee: 1935, Social Planning for Canada (Thomas Nelson, Toronto).Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, C. I.: 1946, Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (Open Court, LaSalle).Google Scholar
  44. MacRae, D.: 1985, Policy Indicators: Links between Social Science and Public Debate (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill).Google Scholar
  45. McDowell, I. and C. Newell: 1996, Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  46. McDowell, I. and E. Praught: 1982, 'On the measurement of happiness: an examination of the Bradburn scale in the Canada Health Survey', American Journal of Epidemiology 116(6), pp. 949-958.Google Scholar
  47. McSweeny, A. J. et al.: 1982, 'Life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease', Archives of Internal Medicine 142, pp. 473-478.Google Scholar
  48. Michalos, A. C.: 1967, 'Postulates of rational preference', Philosophy of Science 34, pp. 18-22.Google Scholar
  49. Michalos, A. C.: 1969, Principles of Logic (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  50. Michalos, A. C.: 1970a, 'Decision making in committees', American Philosophical Quarterly 7, pp. 91-106.Google Scholar
  51. Michalos, A.C.: 1970b, 'Cost-benefit versus expected utility acceptance rules', Theory and Decision 1, pp. 61-88.Google Scholar
  52. Michalos, A. C.: 1970c, 'The impossibility of an ordinal measure of acceptability', Philosophical Forum 2, pp. 103-106.Google Scholar
  53. Michalos, A. C.: 1970d, 'The costs of decision making', Public Choice 9, pp. 39-51.Google Scholar
  54. Michalos, A. C.: 1979, 'The loyal agent's argument', in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs), pp. 247-253. Reprinted in Michalos 1995.Google Scholar
  55. Michalos, A. C.: 1978, Foundations of Decision-Making (Canadian Library of Philosophy, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  56. Michalos, A. C.: 1980, North American Social Report, Vol. 1: Foundations, Population and Health (D. Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
  57. Michalos, A. C.: 1985, 'Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT)', Social Indicators Research 16, pp. 347-413.Google Scholar
  58. Michalos, A. C.: 1988, 'Integrated development planning using socio-economic and quality of life indicators', in Innovative Approaches to Development Planning (UNESCO, Paris), pp. 113-216.Google Scholar
  59. Michalos, A. C.: 1990, 'The impact of trust on business, international security and the quality of life', Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 619-638. Reprinted in Michalos 1995.Google Scholar
  60. Michalos, A. C.: 1991, Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 1: Life Satisfaction and Happiness (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  61. Michalos, A. C.: 1991a, Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 2: Family, Friends, Living Partner and Self-Esteem (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  62. Michalos, A. C.: 1992, 'Ethical considerations in evaluation', Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 7, pp. 61-75. Reprinted in Michalos 1995.Google Scholar
  63. Michalos, A. C.: 1993, Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 3: Employment, Finances, Housing and Transportation (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  64. Michalos, A. C.: 1993a, Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 4: Religion, Education, Recreation and Health (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  65. Michalos, A. C.: 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks).Google Scholar
  66. Michalos, A. C.: 1997, 'Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being', Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 221-258.Google Scholar
  67. Michalos, A. C.: 1999, 'Reflections on twenty-five years of quality-of-life research', Feminist Economics 5(2), pp. 119-123.Google Scholar
  68. Michalos, A. C.: 2001, 'Ethics counselors as a new priesthood', Journal of Business Ethics 29, pp. 3-17.Google Scholar
  69. Michalos, A. C., A. Hubley, B. D. Zumbo and D. Hemingway: 2001, 'Health and other aspects of the quality of life of older people', Social Indicators Research 54(1), p. xxx.Google Scholar
  70. Michalos, A. C. and B. D. Zumbo: 1999, 'Public services and the quality of life', Social Indicators Research 48, pp. 125-156.Google Scholar
  71. Michalos, A. C. and B. D. Zumbo: 2001, 'Ethnicity, modern prejudice and the quality of life', Social Indicators Research 53, pp. 189-222.Google Scholar
  72. Michalos, A. C. and B. D. Zumbo: tbe, 'Leisure activities, health and the quality of life'.Google Scholar
  73. Michalos, A. C., B. D. Zumbo and A. Hubley: 2000, 'Health and the quality of life', Social Indicators Research 51, pp. 245-286.Google Scholar
  74. Mitchell, W. C.: 1918, 'Bentham's felicific calculus', Political Science Quarterly 33, pp. 161-183.Google Scholar
  75. Najman, J. M. and S. Levine: 1981, 'Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: A review and critique', Social Science and Medicine 15F, pp. 107-115.Google Scholar
  76. Nerenz, D. R., D. P. Repasky, F. W. Whitehouse and D. M. Kahkonen: 1992, 'Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus', Medical Care 30(5)(Supplement), pp. MS112-MS124.Google Scholar
  77. Noll, H.-H. and W. Zapf: 1994, 'Social indicators research: Societal monitoring and social reporting', in I. Borg and P. Ph. Mohler (eds.), Trends and Perspectives in Empirical Social Research (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
  78. Nord, E., T. Arnesen, P. Menzel and Jose-Luis Pinto: 2001, 'Towards a more restricted use of the term “quality of life”', Quality of Life Newsletter 26, pp. 3-4.Google Scholar
  79. Nussbaum, M. C. and A. Sen (eds.): 1993, The Quality of Life (Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  80. Patrick, D. L. and R. A. Deyo: 1989, 'Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life', Medical Care 27(3), pp. s217-s232.Google Scholar
  81. Perry, R. B.: 1926, General Theory of Value (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  82. Perry, R. B.: 1954, Realms of Value (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  83. Pilowsky, I. et al.: 1983, 'The illness behavior assessment schedule: Reliability and validity', International Journal of Psychiatry and Medicine 13, pp. 11-28.Google Scholar
  84. Poff, D. C.: 1987, 'The loyal agent's argument revisited', in D. C. Poff and W. J. Waluchow (eds.), Business Ethics in Canada (Prentice-Hall Canada, Toronto), pp. 142-144.Google Scholar
  85. President's Research Committee on Social Trends: 1933, Recent Social Trends in the United States, Vols. 1 and 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  86. Prigatano, G. P., E. C. Wright and D. Levin: 1984, 'Quality of life and its predictors in patients with mild hypoxemia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease', Archives of Internal Medicine 144, pp. 1613-1619.Google Scholar
  87. Radloff, L. S.: 1977, 'The CES-D scale: A self-report deporession scale for research in the general population', Applied Psychological Measurement 1, pp. 385-401.Google Scholar
  88. Renwick, R. and I. Brown: 1996, 'The Centre for Health Promotion's conceptual approach to quality of life', in R. Renwick, I. Brown and M. Nagler (eds.), Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches, Issues and Applications (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks), pp. 75-86.Google Scholar
  89. Sandvik, E., E. Diener and L. Seidlitz: 1993, 'Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures', Journal of Personality 61, pp. 317-342.Google Scholar
  90. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.): 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (Open Court, LaSalle).Google Scholar
  91. Schipper, H. et al.: 1984, 'Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index — Cancer: Development and validation', Journal of Clinical Oncology 2, pp. 472-483.Google Scholar
  92. Schwarz, N. and H. Bless, 1992, 'Constructing reality and its alternatives: Assimilation and contrast effects', in L. L. Marting and A. Tesser (eds.), The Construction of Social Judgment (Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.), pp. 217-245.Google Scholar
  93. Schwarz, N. and G. L. Clore, 1983, 'Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, pp. 513-523.Google Scholar
  94. Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, 'Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications', in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), pp. 61-84.Google Scholar
  95. Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1991, 'Evaluating one's life: A judgment model of subjective well-being', in F. Strack, M. Argyle and N. Schwarz (eds.), Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Pergamon, Oxford), pp. 27-47.Google Scholar
  96. Sirgy, J.: in press, Handbook of Quality-of-Life Research: An Ethical Marketing Perspective (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
  97. Solomon, E.: 1980, Consultation of Research Network on the Quality of Life, Division for Socio-Economic Analysis, UNESCO, Paris, 3–5 December.Google Scholar
  98. Sprangers, M. A. G.: 1996, 'Response-shift bias: A challenge to the assessment of patients' quality of life in cancer clinical trials', Cancer Treatment Reviews 22(Supplement A), pp. 55-62.Google Scholar
  99. Sprangers, M. A. G. and C. E. Schwartz: 1999, 'Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model', Social Science and Medicine 48, pp. 1507-1515.Google Scholar
  100. Tatarkiewicz, W.: 1976, Analysis of Happiness (M. Nijhoff, Hague).Google Scholar
  101. Taylor, S. E. and J. D. Brown: 1988, 'Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health', Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 193-210.Google Scholar
  102. Torrance, G. W.: 1986, 'Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal', Journal of Health Economics 5, pp. 1-30.Google Scholar
  103. Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (D. Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
  104. Veenhoven, R. and P. Ouweneel: 1995, 'Livability of the welfare-state, appreciation-of-life and length-of-life in nations varying in state-welfare-effort', Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 1-49.Google Scholar
  105. Verbrugge, L. M., S. S. Merrill and X. Liu: 1999, 'Measuring disability with parsimony', Disability and Rehabilitation 21(5/6), pp. 295-306.Google Scholar
  106. Vogel, J.: 1994, 'Social indicators and social reporting', Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE 11, pp. 241-260.Google Scholar
  107. Ware, J. E., K. K. Snow, M. Kosinski and B. Gandek: 1993, SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide (The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex C. Michalos
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Social Research and EvaluationUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations