Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 131–149 | Cite as

Comparing Union and Nonunion Staff Perceptions of the Higher Education Work Environment

  • Jim Vander Putten
  • Michael K. McLendon
  • Marvin W. Peterson
Article

Abstract

Evidence of substantial growth in unionization among university noninstructional staff over the past 20 years (Hurd and Woodhead, 1987) and the emergence of a quality movement in higher education linking employee attitudes toward the work environment with increased productivity point to the need for additional research into union and nonunion staff perceptions of the work environment. This paper describes a conceptually oriented, exploratory study of the university work environment as perceived and defined by union and nonunion noninstructional staff.

Keywords

High Education Productivity Point Additional Research Work Environment Exploratory Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Asplund, G. (1988). Women Managers: Changing Organizational Cultures. Chichester, GB: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Attinasi, L. (1990, Fall–Winter). Phenomenological Interviewing in the Conduct of Institutional Research: An Argument and an Illustration. AIR Professional File No. 38. Tallahassee, FL: The Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, A. (1990). Faculty cultures, faculty values. In W. Tierney (ed.), Assessing Academic Climates and Cultures (pp. 61-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, A., and Gamson, Z. (1983). Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  5. Baldridge, J. V. (1978). Policy Making and Effective Leadership: A National Study of Academic Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, M., Vander Putten, J., Peterson, M., and Cameron, K. (1995). Perceptions of Non-instructional Staff at the University of Michigan: A Content Analysis. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 387 016.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, C. (1990, February 12). Lessons of the Harvard drive. The Nation, pp. 196-198.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, C., Olson, C., and Boudreau, J. (1983, December). Effects of unions on job satisfaction: The role of work-related values and perceived rewards. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 32: 289-324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birnbaum, R. (1980). Creative Academic Bargaining: Managing Conflict in the Unionized College and University. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  10. Blackburn, R., and Lawrence, J. (1995). Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blackburn, R., Lawrence, J., Hart, K., and Dickman, E. (1990). Same Institution, Different Perceptions: Faculty and Administrators Report on the Work Environment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, NCRIPTAL.Google Scholar
  12. Blackburn, R., Pitney, J., Lawrence, J., and Trautvetter, L. (1989). Administrators' career backgrounds and their congruence with faculty beliefs and behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Boothe, J., and Lincoln, J. (1993, Spring). Unions and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Industrial Relations 32: 159-187.Google Scholar
  14. Bowen, H., and Schuster, J. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chaffee, E., and Tierney, W. (1988). Collegiate Culture and Leadership Strategies. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Conlon, E., and Gallagher, D. (1987, March). Commitment to employer and union: Effects of membership status. Academy of Management Journal 30: 151-162.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Deming, W. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
  19. Dennison, D. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, L., (1989). The future of public sector unions: Stagnation or growth? The American Economic Review 79(2): 161-165.Google Scholar
  21. Fetterman, D. (1991). Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 72. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Gilmore, J. (1981). The impact of faculty collective bargaining on the management of public higher educational institutions. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 10(2): 145-152.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, M., & DeNisi, A. (1995, January). A re-examination of the relationship between union membership and job satisfaction. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48: 222-236.Google Scholar
  24. Guthrie-Morse, J. (1981). Assessing the impact of faculty unions: The financial implications of collective bargaining. Journal of Higher Education 52(3): 237-255.Google Scholar
  25. Hills, S. (1985, January). The attitudes of union and nonunion male workers toward union representation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38: 179-194.Google Scholar
  26. Hovekamp, T. (1994). Work values among professional employees in union and nonunion research library institutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24(11): 981-993.Google Scholar
  27. Hurd, R., and Woodhead, G. (1987). The Unionization of Clerical Workers at Large U.S. Universities and Colleges. National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, P., and Clark, R. (1987). Collective bargaining and faculty compensation: Faculty as a new working class. Sociology of Education 60: 242-256.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, G., and Johnson, W. (1995). The effects of union membership on multiple work commitments among female public sector employees. Journal of Psychology 129(2): 181-191.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, A., and James, L. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23: 201-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keegan, C. (1987, August). How union members and nonmembers view the role of unions. Monthly Labor Review 110: 50-51.Google Scholar
  32. Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  33. Meador, M., and Walters, S. (1994, Fall). Unions and productivity: Evidence from academe. Journal of Labor Research 15: 373-386.Google Scholar
  34. Olson, J., and Fenwick, R. (1986, August). Support for worker participation: Attitudes among union and non-union workers. American Sociological Review 51: 505-522.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, M., and Spencer, M. (1993). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to academic culture: Do they tell us the same thing? In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 9 (pp. 344-388). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  36. Peterson, M., and White, T. (1992). Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization? Research in Higher Education, 33(2): 177-204.Google Scholar
  37. Peterson, M., Cameron, K., Jones, P., Mets, L., and Ettington, D. (1986). The Organizational Context for Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. Ann Arbor: NCRIPTAL, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, M., Cameron, K., Julia, J., Winn, B., Spencer, M., and Vander Putten, J. (1994, May). Assessing the culture and climate for quality improvement in the work environment. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Forum, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  39. Richardson, R., and Mortimer, K. (1978). Collective bargaining and the redefinition of administrative roles. Educational Record 59(4): 332-344.Google Scholar
  40. Sanchez, P., and Juetten, S. (1988). What do employees think about their compensation? Journal of Compensation and Benefits 4(3): 164-175.Google Scholar
  41. Schein, E. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Schneider, B., and Rentsch, J. (1988). Managing climates and cultures. In J. Hage (ed.), Futures of Organizations: Innovating to Adapt Strategy and Human Resources to Technological Change (pp. 181-200). Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  43. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  44. Sherr, L. (1990). Is there a better way to manage higher education? In T. Karolewski (ed.), Higher Education and the Future: Initiatives for Institutional Research. Tallahassee, FL: The Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, R., and Hopkins, A. (1979). Public employee attitudes toward unions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 32(4): 484-495.Google Scholar
  46. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Labor (1994). Handbook of Labor Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Vander Putten
    • 1
  • Michael K. McLendon
    • 1
  • Marvin W. Peterson
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations