Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 197–220 | Cite as

The Effect of Interviewer Gender on the Survey Response

  • Leonie Huddy
  • Joshua Billig
  • John Bracciodieta
  • Lois Hoeffler
  • Patrick J. Moynihan
  • Patricia Pugliani
Article

Abstract

We examined the existence of gender-of-interviewer effects in two local-area surveys in which male and female interviewers were randomly assigned to interview male and female respondents. Small but consistent gender-of-interviewer effects arose on questions related to the women's movement, women's issues, and gender equality, demonstrating that, as expected, respondents were more likely to provide feminist answers to female interviewers. Gender-of-interviewer effects were somewhat more pronounced and consistent on controversial political topics: the women's movement (feminists and political activism) and their policy agenda. There was mixed evidence on whether respondents were equally susceptible to gender-of-interviewer effects. In one of the surveys, gender-of-interviewer effects were more pronounced among less well-educated and younger respondents than among respondents who were better educated or older. This effect was not replicated in the second survey.

Keywords

Political Activism Gender Equality Survey Response Policy Agenda Female Respondent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, Barbara A., Silver, Brian D., and Abramson, Paul R. (1988). The effects of the race of interviewer on race-related attitudes of black respondents in SRC/CPS National Election Studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52: 289-324.Google Scholar
  2. Argentino, Concetta M., Kidd, Aline H., and Bogart, Karen (1977). The effects of experimenter's sex and subject's sex on the attitudes toward women of fraternity, sorority, and mixed-dormitory residents. Journal of Community Psychology 5: 186-188.Google Scholar
  3. Ballou, Janice (1990). Respondent/interviewer gender interaction effects in telephone surveys. Paper presented at the 1990 International Conference on Measurement Errors in Surveys, Tucson.Google Scholar
  4. Ballou, Janice, and DelBoca, Frances K. (1980). Gender interaction effects on survey measures in telephone interviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Mason, Ohio.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Betsy, J. (1986). Influence again: An examination of reviews and studies of gender-difference research. In Janet S. Hyde and Marcia C. Linn (eds.), The Psychology of Gender: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, George (1990). Issue involvement and response effects in public opinion surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 209-218.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, Bruce A. (1981). Race-of-interviewer effects among southern adolescents. Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 231-244.Google Scholar
  8. Crowne, D., and Marlow, D. (1964). The Approval Motive. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. DeMaio, Theresa J. (1984). Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In Charles E. Turner and Elizabeth Martin (eds.), Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 2. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Devine, Patricia G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5-18.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, Alice H. (1983). Gender and social influence. American Psychologist 38: 971-981.Google Scholar
  12. Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin 90: 1-20.Google Scholar
  13. Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268-307.Google Scholar
  14. Finkel, Steven E., Guterbock, Thomas M., and Borg, Marian J. (1991). Race-of-interviewer effects in a preelection poll. Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 313-330.Google Scholar
  15. Grimes, Michael D., and Hansen, Gary L. (1984). Response bias in sex-role attitude measurement. Sex Roles 10: 67-72.Google Scholar
  16. Groves, Robert M., and Fultz, Nancy H. (1985). Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods and Research 14: 31-52.Google Scholar
  17. Gurin, Patricia (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 143-163.Google Scholar
  18. Hatchett, Shirley, and Schuman, Howad (1975/76). White respondnets and race-of-interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 523-28.Google Scholar
  19. Kalmuss, Debra, Gurin, Patricia, and Townsend, Aloen L. (1981). Feminist and sympathetic feminist consciousness. European Journal of Social Psychology 11: 131-147.Google Scholar
  20. Kane, Emily W., and Macaulay, Laura J. (1993). Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 1-28.Google Scholar
  21. Krosnick, Jon A., and Abelson, Robert (1992). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In Judith Tanur (ed.), Questions about Questions. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Krosnick, John A., and Schuman, Howard (1988). Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 940-952.Google Scholar
  23. Landis, Judson R., Sullivan, Daryl, and Sheley, Joseph (1973). Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer. Pacific Sociological Review 16: 305-314.Google Scholar
  24. Lenski, Gerhard E., and Leggett, John C. (1960). Caste, class and deference in the research interview. The American Journal of Sociology 65: 463-467.Google Scholar
  25. Lueptow, Lloyd B., Moser, Susan L., and Pendleton, Brian F. (1990). Gender and response effects in telephone interviews about gender characteristics. Sex Roles 22: 29-42.Google Scholar
  26. Paulhaus, Delroy L., and Reid, Douglas B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 307-317.Google Scholar
  27. Philips, Derek (1971). Knowledge from What? Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  28. Schuman, Howard, and Converse, Jean M. (1971). The effects of black and white interviewers on black responses. Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 44-68.Google Scholar
  29. Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley (1981). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments in Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, Jacqueline (1989). Conflicting beliefs about abortion: Legal approval and moral doubt. Social Psychology Quarterly 52:319-326.Google Scholar
  31. Sears, David O., and Huddy, Leonie (1990). On the origins of the political disunity of women. In Patricia Gurin and Louise Tilly (eds.), Women, Politics and Change. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36: 579-616.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonie Huddy
    • 1
  • Joshua Billig
  • John Bracciodieta
  • Lois Hoeffler
  • Patrick J. Moynihan
  • Patricia Pugliani
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceState University of New YorkStony Brook

Personalised recommendations