Abstract
The catastrophe theory of attitudes (Latané and Nowak, 1994) predicts that unimportant attitudes act as continuous dimensions, with normal distributions and gradual changes in evaluation, while important attitudes act as categories, with bipolar or unipolar extreme distributions and catastrophic (abrupt) changes in evaluation. A major derivation from this theory is that attitude importance and extremity should be correlated, with more important attitudes being more extreme. This prediction was confirmed for 14 specific political issues at both the group and the individual level, as well as for political involvement and general liberalism. However, general political involvement was not related to the extremity of evaluation for specific issues; similarly, partisanship predicted extremity of general liberalism but not extremity on specific issues. Results suggest that attitude importance and extremity must be measured at corresponding levels of specificity in order for a relationship between them to hold. These results have implications for attitude change in both individuals and societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abelson, R. P. (1964). Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In N. Fredericksen and H. Gullicksen (eds.), Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (pp. 142–160). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Abelson, R. P. (1968). Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Abelson, R. P. (1988). Conviction. American Psychologist 43: 267–275.
Abelson, R. P. (1995). Dynamics of attitude extremity. In R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 25–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, N. H. (1981a). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1981b). Information integration theory applied to cognitive responses and attitudes. In R. E Petty and T. C. Brock (eds.), Cognitive Responses in Persuasion (pp. 361–397). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Basmajian, H. (1974). The Language of Oppression. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 204–243). New York: Guilford Press.
Gamson, W. (1975). The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Griffin, L. M. (1969). A dramatistic theory of the rhetoric of movements. In W. H. Rueckert (ed.), Critical Responses to Kenneth Burke. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review 9: 139–150.
Harton, H. C., and B. Latané (1993, September). Personal relevance, cognitive processing, and attitude extremity. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society, Jesus College, Oxford.
Harton, H. C., and B. Latané (1994, May). Information, thought, and extremity. Poster presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Higgins, E. T., and G. A. King (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor and J. Kihlstrom (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (pp. 69–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1141–1151.
Jackson, T. H., and G. E. Marcus (1975). Political competence and ideological constraint. Social Science Research 4: 93–111.
Johnson, B. T., and A. H. Eagley, (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106: 290–314.
Johnson, N. (1985). Public opinion: Micro-processes and macro-structure. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meetings, Washington, DC.
Judd, C. M., and J. A. Krosnick (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald (eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 99–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Judd, C. M., and J. Kulick (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes in information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 569–578.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
King, A. A., and F. D. Anderson (1971). Nixon, Agnew, and “The Great Silent Majority”: A case study in the rhetoric of polarization. Western Speech 35 (Fall) 243–255.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24: 240–255.
Krosnick, J. A., D. S. Boninger, Y. C. Chung, M. K., Berent, and C. G. Carnot (1993). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 1132–1151.
Lane, R. E. (1962). Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36: 343–356.
Latané, B. (1996a). Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication. Journal of Communication 46(4): 13–25.
Latané, B. (1996b). Strength from weakness: The fate of opinion minorities in spatially distributed groups. In E. Witte and J. Davis (eds.), Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups (pp. 193–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Latané, B. (1996c). The emergence of clustering and correlation from social interaction. In R. Hegselmann and H. O. Peitgen (eds.), Modelle Sozialer Dynamiken: Ordnung, Chaos und Komplexität (pp. 79–104). Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Latané, B., and J. H. Liu (1996). The intersubjective geometry of social space. Journal of Communication 46(4): 26–34.
Latané, B., and A. Nowak (1994). Attitudes as catastrophes: From dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. In R. Vallacher and A. Nowak (eds.), Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology (pp. 219–249). New York: Academic Press.
Latané, B., and A. Nowak (1997). Self-organizing social systems: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of clustering and polarization. In F. Boster and G. Barnett (eds.), Progress in Communication Science: Persuasion (pp. 43–74). New York: Ablex.
Latané, B., A. Nowak, and J. H. Liu (1994). Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, clustering, and polarization as order parameters of social systems. Behavioral Science 39: 1–39.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140: 1–55.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 193–211.
Liu, J. H., and B. Latané (1993, November). Individual and group level attitude polarization over time. Paper presented at the Society for Southeastern Social Psychologists, Gatlinburg, Tennessee.
Markus, H., and R. B. Zajonc (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd ed., vol. 1, pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.
McCombs, M. E. (1981). The agenda-setting approach. In D. D. Nimmo and K. R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 121–140). Beverly Hills: Sage.
McGuire, W. J. (1960). A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. In C. I. Hovland and M. J. Rosenberg (eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Components (pp. 65–111). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd ed., vol. II, pp 233–346). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Millar, M. G., and A. Tesser (1986). Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 259–269.
Myers, H., and H. Lamm (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin 83: 602–627.
Nie, N., and K. Anderson (1974). Mass belief systems revisited: Political change and attitude structure. Journal of Politics 36: 541–591.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication 24: 43–51.
Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latané (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97: 362–376.
Peffley, M. A., and J. Hurwitz (1985). A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. American Journal of Political Science 29: 871–890.
Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition and integration. Psychological Bulletin 107: 367–374.
Raden, D. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 312–330.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Schuman, H., and S. Presser (1981). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
Sherif, M., and C. I. Hovland (1961). Social Judgments: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sherif, M., and C. W. Sherif (1967). Attitude as the individual's own categories: The social judgment-involvement approach to attitude and attitude change. In C. W. Sherif and M. Sherif (eds.), Attitude, Ego-Involvement, and Change (pp. 105–139). New York: Wiley.
Sherif, C., M. Sherif, and R. E. Nebergall (1965). Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Sidanius, J., and F. Pratto (1993). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. In P. Sniderman and P. E. Tetlock (eds.), Prejudice, Politics, and Race in America Today (pp. 173–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Simons, H. W., and E. W. Mechling (1981). The rhetoric of political movements. In D. D. Nimmo and K. R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 417–444). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Stimson, J. A. (1975). Belief systems: Constraint, complexity, and the 1972 election. American Journal of Political Science 19: 393–417.
Stouffer, S. A., L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F., Lazarsfeld, S. A., Star, and J. A. Clausen (1950). Measurement and Prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sullivan, J., J. Piereson, and G. E. Marcus (1978). Ideological constraint in mass publics: A methodological critique and some new findings. American Journal of Political Science 22: 233–249.
Szamrej, J., A. Nowak, and B. Latané (1992, July). Self-organizing attitudinal structures in society: Visual display of dynamic social processes. Poster presented at XXV International Congress of Psychology, Brussels.
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 11, pp. 289–338). New York: Academic Press.
Thomsen, C. J., E. Borgida, and H. Lavine (1995). The causes and consequences of personal involvement. In R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (eds.), Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude Strength (pp. 191–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thurstone, L. (1931). The measurement of attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 26: 249–269.
Turner, R., and L. Killian (1972). Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Vinokur, A., and E. Bernstein (1978). Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology 8: 335–348.
Wyer, R. S. (1970). Quantitative prediction of belief and opinion change: A further test of the subjective probability model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16: 559–570.
Zeeman, E. C. (1977). Catastrophe Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J.H., Latané, B. The Catastrophic Link Between the Importance and Extremity of Political Attitudes. Political Behavior 20, 105–126 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024828729174
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024828729174