Social Indicators Research

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Wealth and Happiness Revisited – Growing National Income Does Go with Greater Happiness

  • Michael R. Hagerty
  • Ruut Veenhoven


``Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?'' Intuitionsays `yes' but theories of relative utility caution that the answer may be`no'. The theory of relative utility holds that people's happiness dependson income relative to others (social comparisons), or on income relative totheir own past income (adaptive expectations) – so that raising the incomes ofall may not increase average long-term happiness. In contrast, the theoryof absolute utility predicts that additional income allows each person to filladditional needs, thus increasing average long-term happiness.Previous tests among these theories have been plagued by low statisticalpower, which has been incorrectly interpreted as evidence against absoluteutility models. The current study improves statistical power by includinglonger time series, by adding nine nations with low GDP/capita and (in someanalyses) by pooling countries into income tiers. We also apply a dynamicmodel by Van Praag and Kapteyn (1973), which can estimate separate effectsfor social comparisons, adaptive expectations, and absolute utility theories.The results show no effect for social comparison across countries, but showsupport for partial adaptation to new income over a two-year period.Most importantly, increasing national income does go with increasingnational happiness, but the short-term effect on happiness is larger thanthe long-term effect for a given rise in income.


Time Series Social Comparison National Income Plague Partial Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barro, R.J.: 1999, 'Determinants of democracy', Journal of Political Economy 107(6), pp. S158-S183.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D.G. and A.J. Oswald: 1999, 'Well-being over time in Britian and the USA', National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, on the web at Scholar
  3. Clark, A.A. and A.J. Oswald: 1996, 'Satisfaction and comparison income', Journal of Public Economics 61, pp. 359-381.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, C., T. Halstead and J. Rowe: 1995, The Genuine Progress Indicator: Summary of Data and Methodology (Redefining Progress, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
  5. Diener, Ed: 1984, 'Subjective well-being', Psychological Bulletin 95, pp. 542-575.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E. and S. Oishi: 2000, 'Money and happiness: Income and subjective wellbeing across nations', in E. Diener and E.M. Suh (eds.), Subjective Well-being Across Cultures (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 185-218).Google Scholar
  7. Duesenberry, J.S.: 1949, Income, Savings, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA).Google Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R.A.: 1974, 'Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence', in P.A. David and M. Reder (eds.), Nations andHouseholds in Economic Growth (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  9. Easterlin, R.A.: 1995, 'Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, pp. 35-47.Google Scholar
  10. Frank, R.H.: 1999, Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Friendman, M.: 1957, A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J.K: 1984, The Affluent Society, 4th ed. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  13. Gill, P.E., W.M. Murray, M.A. Saunders and M.H. Wright: 1984, 'Procedures for optimization problems with a mixture of bounds and linear constraints', ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 103(3), pp. 282-296.Google Scholar
  14. Hagerty, M.R.: 2000, 'Social comparisons of income in one's community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(4), pp. 746-771.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R. and H-D. Klingemann: 2000, 'Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness', in E. Diener and E. Suh (eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-Being (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 165-184).Google Scholar
  16. Ingelhart, R. and J-R. Rabier: 1986 'Aspirations adapt to situations-But why are the Belgians so much happier than the French?', in F.M. Andrews (ed.), Research on the Quality of Life (Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 1-56).Google Scholar
  17. Inkeles, A.: 1993, 'Industralization, modernization, and the quality of life', International Journal of Comparative Sociology 31(1), pp. 1-23.Google Scholar
  18. Kapteyn, A. and T. Wansbeek: 1985, 'The individual welfare function: A review', Journal of Economic Psychology 6, pp. 333-363.Google Scholar
  19. Lane, R.E.: 1993, 'Does money buy happiness?', The Public Interest 113 (Fall), pp. 56-65.Google Scholar
  20. Lane, R: 2000, The Decline of Happiness in Market Democracies (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Marshall, T.: 1997, 'Does income make us happy?' San Francisco Chronicle.Google Scholar
  22. Michalos, A.C.: 1985, 'Multiple Discrepancies Theory (MDT)', Social Indicators Research 6(1), pp. 347-413.Google Scholar
  23. Oswald, A.J.: 1997, 'Happiness and economic performance', The Economic Journal (Nov.), pp. 1815-1831.Google Scholar
  24. Sachs, J.D. and A. Warner: 1997, 'Fundamental sources of long-run growth', American Economic Review (May) 87(2), pp. 184-188.Google Scholar
  25. Schyns, P.: 1998, 'Crossnational differences in happiness: Economic and cultural factors explored', Social Indicators Research 43, pp. 3-26.Google Scholar
  26. Scitovsky, T.: 1992, The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  27. United Nations: 1961, United Nations Statistical Yearbook (New York).Google Scholar
  28. Van de Stadt, H., A. Kapteyn and S. van de Geer: 1985, 'The relativity of utility: evidence from panel data', The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (May), pp. 179-187.Google Scholar
  29. Van Praag, B.M.S. and A. Kapteyn: 1973, 'Further evidence on the individual welfare function of income: An empirical investigation in the Netherlands', European Economic Review 4, pp. 33-62.Google Scholar
  30. Veenhoven, R.: 1989, 'National Wealth and individual happiness', in K.G. Grumert and F. Olander (eds.), Understanding Economic Behavior (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 9-32).Google Scholar
  31. Veenhoven, R.: 1991, 'Is happiness relative?', Social Indicators Research 24, pp. 1-34.Google Scholar
  32. Veenhoven, R.: 1997, 'Developments in satisfaction research', Social Indicators Research 37, pp. 1-46.Google Scholar
  33. Veenhoven, R.: 1999, 'World Database of Happiness, Catalog of Happiness in Nations', Scholar
  34. Veenhoven, R.: 2000, 'Wellbeing in the welfare state, level not higher, distribution not more equitable', Journal of Camparive Policy Analysis 2, pp. 91-125.Google Scholar
  35. Veenhoven, R. & J. Ehrhardt: 1995, 'The cross-national pattern of happiness. Tests of predictions implied in three theories of happiness', Social Indicators research 34, pp. 33-68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Hagerty
    • 1
  • Ruut Veenhoven
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA E-mail
  2. 2.Erasmus University Rotterdam and University UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations