Skip to main content
Log in

Cascade Electronuclear Systems with a Liquid-Cadmium Rectifier

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Abstract

Three basic variants of bireactor electronuclear systems are discussed. It is shown that the most effective, from the standpoint of the best output characteristics and safe operating regimes, are bireactor systems with a booster operating on enriched uranium and a liquid-cadmium rectifier. Monte Carlo simulation is used to show that during operation of the setup conditions can be created under which the destruction of an intermediate layer makes such systems supercritical (k eff > 1). This can be avoided using a special construction of the rectifier with liquid cadmium. Cascade nuclear systems possess substantial advantages over other nuclear setups (critical reactors, single-reactor electronuclear systems), making it possible to decrease the proton current by approximately a factor of 10 and ensure in the process the required power level and neutron flux, and the presence of a fast and thermal cores makes it possible to burn efficiently not only transuranium elements but also to transmute fission products – cesium, iodine, technetium, which have a high capacity for penetrating into the biosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Proceedings of the International Conference ADTTA 01, November 12–15, 2001, Reno, Nevada.

  2. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Systems, September 28, 2000, Petten.

  3. S. A. Bznuni, V. M. Zhankochyan, A. G. Khudaverdyan, et al., “Monte Carlo simulation of the parameters of two-reactor electronuclear systems,” At. Énerg., 92, No.5, 344–351 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. R. Bergel'son, A. A. Nikitin, V. T. Starostin, et al., “Subcritical setup (target–blanket) for actinide transmutation,” At. Énerg., 82, No.5, 341–361 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Bznuni, V. S. Barashenkov, V. M. Zhamkochyan, et al., “Monte Carlo simulation of the parameters of a subcritical cascade reactor based on liquid-salt and liquid-metal technology,” Preprint OIYAI R2/2001-124, Dubna (2001).

  6. V. F. Kolesov and B. Ya. Guzhovskii, “Increasing the efficiency of electronuclear transmutation setup by multisectionalizing the blanket structure,” At. Énerg., 76, No.1, 71–77 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. F. Kolesov, S. K. Shtarev, V. Kh. Khoruzhii, and A. K. Zhitnik, “Effectiveness of electronuclear setup with a blanket based on fused salts and neptunium multiplying target,” At. Énerg., 79, No.1, 40–45 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. F. Kolesov and V. Kh. Khoruzhii, “Neutron characteristics of models of a cascade two-section blanket,” At. Énerg., 88, No.5, 330–337 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. F. Kolesov, N. V. Zav'yalov, I. A. Ivanin, et al., “Experimental investigation of models of a cascade blanket of an electronuclear system,” At. Énerg., 92, No.1, 42–50 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. M. Ado, D. V. Gorbatkov, V. P. Kryuchkov, and V. N. Lebedev, “Some advantages and disadvantages of an electronuclear reactor based on a two-section blanket,” in: 8th International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Systems, ICENES 96, Obninsk, June 24–28, 1996, Vol. 2, pp. 587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. V. Seliverstov, “Multiplication of neutrons from an external source in cascade subcritical systems with unilateral neutron coupling,” At. Énerg., 81, No.5, 378–390 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. N. Alekseev, V. V. Ignat'ev, O. E. Kolyaskin, et al., “Cascade subcritical enhanced-safety reactor,” At. Énerg., 79, No.5, 327–337 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Dudnikov, P. Alekseev, N. Kotkin, et al., “Transmutation of long-lived radioactive waste in critical and cascade subcritical molten salt reactors,” in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on ADTTA, June 7–11, 1999, Praha.

  14. P. N. Alekseev, V. V. Ignat'ev, O. E. Kolyaskin, et al., “Cascade subcritical reactor as a fuel-cycle component,” At. Énerg., 79, No.4, 243–252 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. A. Bznuni, A. H. Khudaverdyan, V. M. Zhamkochyan, et al., “Monte Carlo modeling of bireactor electronuclear system,” Comp. Methods in Sci. Eng., 2, No.1–2, 21–29 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. S. Barashenkov, “Monte Carlo simulation of ionization and nuclear processes initiated by hadron and ion beams in media,” Comp. Phys. Comm., 126, 28–31 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. P. Abagyan, N. O. Bazazyants, W. Gudowski, and A. Polanski, Group Constants for Calculating Nuclear Reactors, Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. S. Barashenkov, W. Gudowski, and A. Polanski, “Integral high-energy nucleon-nucleus cross sections for mathematical experiments with electronuclear facilities,” in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on ADTTA, June 7–11, 1999, Praha.

  19. Yu. Briesmeister, “General Monte Carlo N-particle transport code,” Report LA-12625-M (March 1997).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bznuni, S.A., Zhamkochyan, V.M., Khudaverdyan, A.G. et al. Cascade Electronuclear Systems with a Liquid-Cadmium Rectifier. Atomic Energy 94, 173–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024202302999

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024202302999

Keywords

Navigation