Abstract
Badcock, and Nesse and Lloyd, have argued that there are important points of agreement between Freud's theory of the mind and a theory of mind suggested by adaptive reasoning. Buller, on the other hand, draws attention to the need to avoid confusing an adaptive rationale with an unconscious motivation. The present paper attempts to indicate what role adaptive reasoning might have to play in justifying psychoanalytic claims. First, it is argued that psychoanalytic claims cannot be justified by the clinical experience of psychoanalysts alone. It is urged that, to avoid interpretative proliferation, it is necessary to base interpretation on some theory which is external to psychoanalysis. Next, Buller's reservations about using adaptive reasoning to justify claims about a personal unconscious, are summarized. Then an argument for the existence of a personal unconscious, is offered, based on experimental evidence from Gur and Sackeim. Then it is argued that adaptive reasoning, though it cannot itself provide evidence for the existence of any psychological mechanism, can valuably guide the search for such evidence. It is argued that such an approach has borne fruit, both in biology generally and specifically in psychology. Finally, it is argued that psychoanalysis is important enough to justify such a research project.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong D. 1980. The Nature of Mind, and Other Essays. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Badcock C. 1994. PsychoDarwinism: The New Synthesis of Darwin and Freud. HarperCollins, London.
Buller D.J. 1999. ‘DeFreuding Evolutionary Psychology: Adaptation and Human Motivation’. In: Hardcastle V.G. (ed.), Where Biology Meets Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 99–114.
Buss D.M. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
Carruthers P. 1996. ‘Simulation and Self-Knowledge: A Defense of Theory-Theory’. In: Carruthers P. and Smith P.K. (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–38.
Cosmides L. and Tooby J. 1992. ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange.’. In: Barkow J., Cosmides L. and Tooby J. (eds), The Adapted Mind. Oxford University Press, New York.
Cosmides L. and Tooby J. 1997. Letter to the Editor, on Stephen Jay Gould's ‘Darwinian Fundamentalism’ and ‘Evolution: The Pleasures of Pluralism’. New York Review of Books July 7.
Davidson D. 1985. ‘Rational Animals’. In: Lepore E. (ed.), Actions and Events. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 473–480.
Dawkins R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Penguin, Harmonsworth.
Dennett D.C. 1995. Darwin 's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Penguin, Harmonsworth.
Dennett D.C. 1996. ‘Intentionality: The Intentional Systems Approach’. In: Dennett D.C. (ed.), Kinds of Minds. Weidenfield and Nicholson, London, pp. 25–73.
Freud S. 1900. The Interpretation of Dreams, part I. In: Strachey J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud Vol. 4. Hogarth Press, London.
Freud S. 1901. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. In: Strachey J. (ed.), Vol. 6.
Freud S. 1915. ‘The Unconscious’. In: Strachey (ed.), Vol. 14., pp. 159–215.
Goldman A. 1993. ‘The Psychology of Folk Psychology’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 16: 16–28.
Gould S.J. and Lewontin R. 1979. ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society. B205:, pp. 581–598.
Grunbaum A. 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Gur R.C. and Sackeim H.A. 1979. ‘Self-Deception: A Concept in Search of a Phenomenon’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 147–169.
Laplanche J. and Pontalis J.B. 1988. The Language of Psychoanalysis. Karnac, London.
Lear J. 1998. ‘On Killing Freud (Again)’. In: Open Minded:Working Out the Logic of the Soul. Harvard University Press.
Mahony P. 1986. Freud and the Rat Man. Yale University Press.
McFarland D. (ed.) 1987. The Oxford Companion to Animal Behaviour. Oxford University Press.
Nesse R.M. and Lloyd A.T. 1992. ‘The Evolution of Psychodynamic Mechanisms’. In: Barkow J.H., Cosmides L. and Tooby J. (eds), The Adapted Mind. Oxford University Press, pp. 601–626.
Rorty R. 1982. ‘Contemporary Philosophy of Mind’. Synthese 53: 323–348.
Rycroft C. 1977. A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Penguin Books, Harmonsworth.
Williams G.C. and Nesse R. 1991. ‘The Dawn of Darwinian Medicine.’. Quarterly Review of Biology 66: 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garvey, B. Darwinian functions and Freudian motivations. Biology & Philosophy 18, 427–444 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146810357
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146810357