Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 45, Issue 1–2, pp 51–63

Ethical Dilemmas in Performance Measurement

  • Inge C. Kerssens-van Drongelen
  • Olaf A.M. Fisscher
Article

Abstract

In this article we discuss the ethical dilemmas facing performance evaluators and the "evaluatees" whose performances are measured in a business context. The concepts of role morality and common morality are used to develop a framework of behaviors that are normally seen as the moral responsibilities of these actors. This framework is used to analyze, based on four empirical situations, why the implementation of a performance measurement system has not been as effective as expected. It was concluded that, in these four cases, unethical behavior (i.e. deviations from the ethical behaviors identified in the framework) provided, at least to some extent, an explanation for the lower than expected effectiveness of the performance measurement procedures. At the end of the paper we present an agenda for further research through which the framework could be further developed and systematically applied to a broader set of cases.

business ethics common-sense morality moral responsibility performance measurement role morality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony, R. N. and V. Govindarajan: 1998, Management Control Systems, 9th edition (Irwin/ McGraw–Hill, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C.: 1998, 'Empowerment: The Emperor's New Clothes', Harvard Business Review 76(3), 98–105.Google Scholar
  3. De Sitter, L. U.: 1989, 'Moderne Sociotechniek', Gedrag en Organisatie 4/5, 222–252.Google Scholar
  4. Emmanuel, C., D. Otley and K. Merchant: 1990, Accounting for Management Control (Chapman & Hall, London).Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, J., J. R. Frederickson and S. A. Pfeffer: 2002, 'The Effect of Information Asymmetry on Negotiated Budgets: An Empirical Investigation', Accounting, Organizations and Society 27, 27–43.Google Scholar
  6. Fisscher, O. A. M., A. H. J. Nijhof, A. T. Laan and W. Schreuder: 2001, 'De verantwoordelijke firma, over een nieuwe fase in de ontwikkeling van de industrie', M&O, Tijdschrift voor Management en Organisatie 55(2), 58–75.Google Scholar
  7. Fisscher, O. A. M., A. H. J. Nijhof and H. Steensma: 2002, 'Dynamics in Responsible Behavior. In Search of Mechanisms for Coping with Responsibility', Working paper, University of Twente, Enschede.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton: 1996, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  9. Kerssens–van Drongelen, I. C.: 1999, 'Systematic Design of R&D Performance Measurement Systems', Published PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.Google Scholar
  10. Kerssens–van Drongelen, I. C. and O. A. M. Fisscher: 2002, 'Ethische aspecten en implicaties van financiële en operationele maatstaven van bedrijfsresultaten', in A. Silljé (ed.), Waarborging van Waarden (Koninklijke van Gorcum, Assen), pp. 104–121.Google Scholar
  11. Kohn, A.: 1993, 'Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work', Harvard Business Review 71(5), 54–63.Google Scholar
  12. Kunz, A. H. and D. Pfaff: 2002, 'Agency Theory, Performance Evaluation, and the Hypothetical Construct of Intrinsic Motivation', Accounting, Organizations and Society 27, 275–295.Google Scholar
  13. Macintosh, N. B.: 1994, Management Accounting and Control Systems (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester).Google Scholar
  14. Moerland, P. W.: 1992, 'Economische Theorievorming omtrent de onderneming (deel 2)', Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie 66(3), 116–125.Google Scholar
  15. Neely, A., H. Richards, K. Mills and M. Bourne: 1997, 'Designing Performance Measures: A Structured Approach', International Journal of Operations and Production Management 17(11), 1131–1152.Google Scholar
  16. Pritchard, R. D.: 1990, Measuring and Improving Organizational Productivity: A Practical Guide (Praeger Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Simons, R.: 1995, 'Control in an Age of Empowerment', Harvard Business Review 73(2), 80–88.Google Scholar
  18. Simons, R.: 2000, Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).Google Scholar
  19. Van Dijk, M.: 1992, 'Participatie van managers in het budgetproces', Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie 66(2), 108–113.Google Scholar
  20. Werhane, P. H. and R. E. Freeman: 1999, 'Business Ethics: The State of the Art', International Journal of Management Reviews 1(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inge C. Kerssens-van Drongelen
    • 1
  • Olaf A.M. Fisscher
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business, Public Administration and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations