Abstract
To manage the impacts of biological invasions, it is important to determine the mechanisms responsible for the effects invasive species have on native populations. When predation by an invader is the mechanism causing declines in a native population, protecting the native species will involve elucidating the factors that affect native vulnerability. To examine those factors, this study measured how a native species responded to an introduced predator, and whether the native response could result in a refuge from predation. Predation by the green crab, Carcinus maenas, has contributed to the decline in numbers of native soft-shell clams, Mya arenaria, and efforts to eradicate crabs have proven futile. We tested how crab foraging affected clam burrowing, and how depth in the sediment affected clam survival. Clams responded to crab foraging by burrowing deeper in the sediment. Clams at shallow depths were more vulnerable to predation by crabs. Results suggest soft-shell clam burrowing is an inducible defense in response to green crab predation because burrowing deeper results in a potential refuge from predation by crabs. For restoring the native clam populations, tents could exclude crabs and protect clams, but when tents must be removed, exposing the clams to cues from foraging crabs should induce the clams to burrow deeper and decrease vulnerability. In general, by exposing potential native prey to cues from introduced predators, we can test how the natives respond, identify whether the response results in a potential refuge, and evaluate the risks to native species survival in invaded communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anolt BR and Werner EE (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology 76: 2230–2234
Banks PB (2001) Predation-sensitive grouping and habitat use by eastern grey kangaroos: a field experiment. Animal Behavior 61: 1013–1021
Beal BF (1994) Biotic and abiotic factors influencing growth and survival in wild and cultured individuals of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria L., in Eastern Maine. PhD thesis, University of Maine, Orono, Maine
Beal BF, Lithgow CD, Shaw DP, Renshaw S and Ouellette D (1995) Overwintering hatchery-reared individuals of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria L. – a field-test of site, clam size, and intraspecific density. Aquaculture 130: 145–158
Behrens-Yamada S and Boulding EG (1996) The role of highly mobile crab predators in the intertidal zonation of their gastropod prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 204: 59–83
Boulding EG (1984) Crab-resistant features of shells of burrowing bivalves: decreasing vulnerability by increasing handling time. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 76: 201–223
Bronmark C and Miner JG (1992) Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morpholgy in crucian carp. Science 258(5086): 1348–1350
Byers JE (1999) The distribution of an introduced mollusc and its role in the long-term demise of a native confamilial species. Biological Invasions 1: 339–352
Byers JE (2000) Competition between two estuarine snails: implications for invasions of exotic species. Ecology 81(5): 1225–1239
Carlton JT (1996) Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78: 97–106
Carlton JT and Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82
Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413: 635–639
Checa AG and Cadee GC (1997) Hydraulic burrowing in the bivalve Mya arenaria linnaeus (Myoidea) and associated ligamental adaptations. Journal of Molluscan Studies 63: 157–171
Cohen AN, Carlton JT and Fountain MC (1995) Introduction, dispersal and potential impacts of the green crab Carcinus maenas in San Francisco Bay, California. Marine Biology 122: 225–237
Dodson SI, Tollrian R and Lampert W (1997) Daphnia swimming behavior during vertical migration. Journal of Plankton Research 19(8): 969–978
Dow RL (1957) The Maine clam, Mya arenaria. A bulletin of the Department of Sea and Shore Fisheries, State House, Augusta, Maine
Ebersole EL and Kennedy VS (1995) Prey preferences of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus feeding on three bivalve species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 118: 167–177
Eggleston DB, Lipcius RN and Hines AH (1992) Density-dependent predation by blue crabs upon infaunal clam species with contrasting distribution and abundance patterns. Marine Ecology Progress Series 85: 55–68
Elner RW(1981) Diet of green crab Carcinus maenas (L.) from Port Herbert, Southwestern Nova Scotia. Journal of Shellfish Research 1: 89–94
Elner RW (1978) The mechanics of predation by the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L.), on the edible mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Oecolgia 36: 333–344
Fritts TH and Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 113–140
Glude JB (1955) The effects of temperature and predators on the abundance of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria, in New England. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 84: 13–26
de Goeij P and Luttikhuizen P (1998) Deep-burying reduces growth in intertidal bivalves: field and mesocosm experiments with Macoma balthica. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228: 327–337
Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM, Dean CA, Shirley KA, Maron JL and Connors PG (2000) The impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California bay. Ecology 81: 1206–1224
Grosholz ED and Ruiz GM (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenas. Biological Conservation 78: 59–66
Grosholz ED and Ruiz GM (1995) Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in central California. Marine Biology 122: 239–247
Hazlett BA (1996) Organisation of hermit crab beaviour: responses to multiple chemical inputs. Behaviour 133: 619–642
Hughes RN and O'Brien N (2001) Shore crabs are able to transfer learned handling skills to novel prey. Animal Behaviour 61: 711–714
Hughes RN and Elner RW (1979) Tactics of a predator, Carcinus maenas, and morphological responses of the prey, Nucella lapillus. Journal of Animal Ecology 48: 65–78
Kitchell JF, Schindler DE, OgutuOhwayo R and Reinthal PN (1997) The Nile perch in Lake Victoria: interactions between predation and fisheries. Ecological Applications 7(2): 653–664
Kolar CS and Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(4): 199–204
Leonard GH, Bertness MD and Yund PO (1999) Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology 80: 1–14
Levinton JS (1982) Marine Ecology. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey
Lewis DE and Cerrato RM (1997) Growth uncoupling and the relationship between shell growth and metabolism in the soft shell clam Mya arenaria. Marine Ecology Progress Series 158: 177–189
Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137
Maaski H and Guillou J (1999) The role of biotic interactions in juvenile mortality of the cockle (Cerastoderma edule L.): field observations and experiment. Journal of Shellfish Research 18: 575–578
McDonald PS, Jensen GC and Armstrong DA (2001) The competitive and predatory impacts of the nonindigenous crab Carcinus maenas (L.) on early benthic phase Dungeness crab Cancer magister Dana. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 258: 39–54
Meire PM and Ervynck A (1986) Are oystercatchers (Haemoptopus ostralegus) selecting the most profitable mussels (Mytilus edulis)? Animal Behavior 34: 1427–1435
Moody KE and Steneck RS (1993) Mechanisms of predation among large decapod crustaceans of the Gulf of Maine Coast: functional vs. phylogenetic patterns. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 168: 111–124
Nilsson PA (2001) Predator behaviour and prey density: evaluating density-dependent intraspecific interactions on predator functional responses. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 14–19
Olson MH (1996) Predator–prey interactions in size-structured fish communities: implications of prey growth. Oecologia 108(4): 757–763
Peacor SD and Werner EE (2001) The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 3904–3908
Rangeley RW and Thomas MLH (1987) Predatory behavior of juvenile shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 108: 191–197
Relyea RA (2001) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82(2): 523–540
Rejmanek M (2000) Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25: 497–506
Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED and Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37: 621–632
Skilleter GA (1994) Refuges from predation and the persistence of estuarine clam populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 109: 29–42
Smith TE, Ydenberg RC and Elner RW (1999) Foraging behaviour of and excavating predator, the red rock crab (Cancer productus Randall) on soft shell clam (Mya arenaria L.) Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 238: 185–197
Stachowicz JJ and Hay ME (1999) Mutualism and coral persistence: the role of herbivore resistance to algal chemical defense. Ecology 80(6): 2085–2101
Stephens DW and Krebs JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Tollrian R (1995) Predator-induced morphological defenses – costs, life-history shifts, and maternal effects in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 76(6): 1691–1705
Tollrian R and Dodson SI (1999) Inducible defenses in cladocera: constraints, costs, and multipredator environments. In: Tollrian R and Harvell C (eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses, pp 177–202. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Trussel GC (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50: 448–454
Trussell GC and Smith LK (2000) Induced defenses in response to an invading crb predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97(5): 2123–2127
Van Dover C and Kirby-Smith WW (1979) Field Guide to Common Marine Invertebrates of Beaufort, NC. Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, North Carolina, 80 pp
van der Veer HW, Feller RJ, Weber A and Witte JIJ (1998) Importance of predation by crustaceans upon bivalve spat in the intertidal zone of the Dutch Wadden Sea as revealed by immunological assays of gut contents. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 231: 139–157
Virnstein RW (1977) The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology 58: 119–1217
Welch WR (1968) Changes in abundance of the green crab, Carcinus maenas (L.), in relation to recent temperature changes. Fisheries Bulletin of the US Fish and Wildlife Service 67(2): 337–345
Whitlow WL (2002) Changes in native species after biological invasion: effects of introduced green crabs on native soft-shell clams and an estuarine community. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Wilson WH (1991) Competition and predation in marine softsediment communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 221–241
Witte F, Goldschmidt T, Wanink J, Vanoijen M, Goudswaard K, Wittemaas E and Bouton N (1992) The destruction of an endemic species flock – quantitative data on the decline of the Haplochromine cichlids of LakeVictoria. Environmental Biology of Fishes 34(1): 1–28
Zaklan SD and Ydenberg R (1997) The body size – burial depth relationship in the infaunal clam Mya arenaria. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 215: 1–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitlow, W.L., Rice, N.A. & Sweeney, C. Native species vulnerability to introduced predators: testing an inducible defense and a refuge from predation. Biological Invasions 5, 23–31 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024059025890
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024059025890