Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185–213 | Cite as

Measuring Costs from Permitted Gaming: Concepts and Categories in Evaluating Gambling's Consequences

  • William R. Eadington
Article

Abstract

This paper addresses the methodology of cost–benefit analysis as applied to policy alternatives regarding legally sanctioned gambling in its various forms. Existing economic studies regarding the social costs of gambling are reviewed and critiqued. Distinctions are made between definitions of social costs that are defined as actions which result in negative changes in aggregate social wealth (the “narrow” definition), and those which also include internal nonmarket costs that are borne by individual gamblers and their immediate families and acquaintances (the “broader” definition). This distinction is important because of its bearing on economic policies that are primarily concerned with economic efficiency versus policies that are more paternalistic, which attempt to protect individuals from self-damage or self-destruction by restricting their ranges of choice. Whether societies choose to prohibit or severely restrict permitted gambling, or allocate substantial resources to mitigate its negative side effects, rests largely on which of these perspectives regarding social costs they find more appropriate. Finally, the issue of social protection through restrictions on the availability of gambling to the entire population, versus a strategy tailored toward identifiable “problem” gamblers, is discussed.

social costs of gambling cost–benefit analysis social wealth nonmarket costs social and economic policies related to gambling social protection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eadington, William R. (1989). “Problem gambling and public policy: Alternatives in dealing with problem gamblers and commercial gambling,” In HowardJ. Shaffer, Sharon Stein, Blaise Gambino, & Tom Cummings (Eds.) (1989). Compulsive gambling: Theory, research, and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 175-186.Google Scholar
  2. Eadington, William R. (1998). “Contributions of casino style gambling to local communities”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, Vol. 556, pp. 53-65, March.Google Scholar
  3. Eadington, William R. (1999). “The economics of casino gambling,” in Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol 13, no. 3, August, pp. 173-192.Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, Robert (1995). The Luck Business: The Devastating Consequences and Broken Promises of America's Gambling Explosion, Martin Kessler Books, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Grinols, Earl and J. Omorov (1996).“Development or dreamfield delusions? Assessing casinos” gambling costs and benefits', Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 49-87.Google Scholar
  6. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. (1996). Harrah's survey of casino entertainment.Google Scholar
  7. National Opinion Research Center (1999). “Gambling Impact and Behavior Study,” prepared for the National Gambling Impact Study Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Productivity Commission (1999), Australia's Gambling Industries, Report No. 10, AusInfo, Canberra. Google Scholar
  9. Shaffer, Howard J., Matthew N. Hall, and Joni Vander Bilt, (1997). “Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis.” Paper prepared for the National Center for Responsible Gambling.Google Scholar
  10. Sherman, William R. (1991). “A casino company's response to compulsive gambling,” in William R. Eadington and Judy A. Cornelius (Eds.), Gambling and Public Policy: International Perspectives. Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada, pp. 671-678.Google Scholar
  11. Thompson, William N., Ricardo C. Gazel, and Daniel Rickman, (1997). “Social and legal costs of compulsive gambling.” Gaming Law Review, Vol. 1, pp. 81-89.Google Scholar
  12. Walker, Douglas M., and A. H. Barnett (1999). “The Social Costs of Gambling: An Economic Perspective,” in Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 181-212.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Eadington
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics/030University of NevadaReno

Personalised recommendations