Abstract
The research investigated how word-specific gender stereotype information can be used during language comprehension. In a rating study, the gender stereotypes for 405 noun and noun compounds were assessed. From these norms, 32 words strongly stereotyped to refer mostly to males and 32 words strongly stereotyped to refer mostly to females were selected and used in a reading experiment. Comprehenders read pairs of sentences. The subject of the first sentence was a gender stereotyped word (e.g., executive or secretary). The subject of the second sentence was either the pronoun he or she. Reading time was significantly longer when gender of the pronoun mismatched the gender stereotype of the antecedent than when the genders of pronoun and antecedent matched. This gender mismatch effect occurred on the two regions immediately following the region containing the pronoun. The results indicated that word-specific gender stereotypes can influence coreference resolution of pronouns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Arnold, J., Eisenband, J., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13-B26.
Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748-769.
Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
Beggs, J. M., & Doolittle, D. C. (1993). Perceptions now and then of occupational sex typing: A replication of Shinar's 1975 study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1435-1453.
Cacciari, C., Carreiras, M., & Cionini, C. B. (1997). When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 517-532.
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601-609.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
Cloitre, M., & Bever, T. (1988). Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 293-322.
Erlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247-255.
Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1986). On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 385-393.
Gordon, P., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 216-231.
Gordon, P., Grosz, B., & Gilliom, L. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 331-347.
Gordon, P., & Scearce, K. (1995). Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory and Cognition, 23, 313-323.
Greene, S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 266-283.
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409-415.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
MacDonald, M., & MacWhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation in pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 469-492.
MacDonald, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543-566.
Matthews, A. L., & Chodorow, M. (1988). Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedent location, and depth of embedding. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 245-260.
Mitchell, D. C., & Green, D. W. (1978). The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 609-636.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure I coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5-19.
Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition, 25, 273-285.
Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. (2002). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1061-1080.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI21-SI49.
Shillcock, R. (1982). The on-line resolution of pronominal anaphora. Language and Speech, 25, 385-401.
Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99-111.
Smyth, R. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 197-229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennison, S.M., Trofe, J.L. Comprehending Pronouns: A Role for Word-Specific Gender Stereotype Information. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 355–378 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023599719948
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023599719948