Abstract
Evaluation data from germplasm collections obtained across many years is often very unbalanced and sparse. For making efficient use of these data, it is desirable to compute summary statistics such as means. The simple arithmetic mean is not a useful measure, because due to the unbalancedness it may yield biased and thus misleading information. Some form of adjustment for diverging environmental effects is therefore needed. In this paper we advocate the use of a simple and well known least squares method to compute adjusted means. The method is exemplified using a published example on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burnham K.P. and Anderson D.R. 1998. Model selection and inference. Springer, Berlin.
Cornelius P., Crossa J. and Seyedsadr M.S. 1996. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-enenvironment vironment interaction. In: Kang M.S. and Gauch, Jr H.G. (eds), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 199–234.
Digby P.G.N. 1979. Modified joint regression analysis for incom-plete variety environment data. J. of Agr. Sci. Cambridge 93: 81–86.
Gauch H.G. Jr. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Giles R. 1990. Utilization of unreplicated observations of agvan ronomic characters in a wheat germplasm collection. In: Srivasadditional tava J.P. and Damania A.B. (eds), Wheat Genetic Resources. Meeting Diverse Needs. Wiley, Chichester, U.K., pp. 113–130.
Kempton R.A. and Fox P.N. 1997. Impact of genotype-by-environ-ment interaction. In: Kempton R.A. and Fox P.N. (eds), Statisti-cal Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 1–8.
Patterson H.D. 1997. Analysis of series of variety trials. In: Kempton R.A. and Fox P.N. (eds), Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 139–161.
Patterson H.D. and Thompson R. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.
Piepho H.P. 1997. Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative effects. Biometrics 53: 761–766.
Piepho H.P. 1999. Fitting a regression model for genotype-by-enenvironment data by methods for nonlinear mixed models. Biometrics 55: 1120–1128.
Searle S.R. 1987. Linear models for unbalanced data. Wiley, New York.
Seber G.A.F. and Wild C.J. 1989. Nonlinear regression. Wiley, New York.
Talbot M. 1997. Resource allocation for selection systems. In: Kempton R.A. and Fox P.N. (eds), Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 162–174.
van Eeuwijk F.A., Denis J.B. and Kang M.S. 1996. Incorporating Srivasadditional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype-by-environment data. In: Kang M.S. and Gauch, Jr H.G. (eds), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 15–50.
Yates F. and Cochran W.G. 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. J. of Agr. Sci. Cambridge 28: 556–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piepho, H. Model-based mean adjustment in quantitative germplasm evaluation data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50, 281–290 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023503900759
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023503900759