Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic susceptibilities of lake sediment and soils on the shoreline of Lake Naivasha, Kenya

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On steep, unvegetated slopes, sands (particle sizes 0.063 to 2 mm) and gravels (2–64 mm) erode from the shoreline of Lake Naivasha (Kenya) and enter the lake basin. This occurred freely where fringing papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) swamp had been cleared in favour of landing jetties or agriculture. Gravel-sized particles have been recovered up to 60 m offshore and sands to 80 m. In an area where papyrus was undisturbed and the swamp margin was 52 m wide, gravel did not enter the lake and sands penetrated to around 35 m. Large particles are much easier to trace to source and to manage than the finer silts and clays (<0.63 μm) that form the bulk of Lake Naivasha's sediment. The pattern of mass specific magnetic susceptibilities for the <63 μm fraction of lake sediment around the southern shoreline of the lake suggests that fine particles enter open water directly from the shoreline and are not transported from the lake's only perennial inflow, the River Malewa in the north. Such particles originate from a hinterland that supports high intensity horticulture and are therefore a potential source of contamination. Mean ± SD susceptibility (χIf) immediately offshore papyrus fringe was 0.49 ± 0.08 × 10-6 m3 kg-1 compared with higher values of 1.33 ± 0.14 × 10-6 m3 kg-1 where there was no papyrus barrier (P<0.0001). The value for five sites in the middle parts of the lake was 0.45 ± 0.02 × 10-6 m3 kg-1 with 1.38 ± 0.10 × 10-6 m3 kg-1 near the mouth of the River Malewa. The results of this study are evidence, therefore, that conservation of a continuous papyrus margin of about 50 m width is a priority for intercepting particulate material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åse, L-E., K. Sernbo & P. Syrén, 1986. Studies of Lake Naivasha, Kenya, and its drainage area. Forsk. Naturgeogr. Inst. Stockholm University 33: 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boar, R. R., D. M. Harper & C. S. Adams, 1999. Biomass and its allocation in Cyperus papyrus in a tropical wetland, Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Biotropica 31: 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F., A. Beeby & P. Kirby, 1998. A study of the macroinvertebrates of Lakes Naivasha, Oloidien and Sonachi, Kenya. Rev. Hydrobiol. Trop. 22: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, C., J. A. Dearing & N. Roberts, 1998. Land use history and sediment flux in a lowland catchment, Groby Pool, Leicestershire, U.K. Holocene 8: 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. A., 1979. The Use of Magnetic Measurements to Study Particulate Flux in Lake-Watershed Ecosystems. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. A., 1999. Holocene environmental change from magnetic proxies in lake sediments. In Maher, B. A. & R. Thompson (eds), Quaternary Climates, Environments andMagnetism. Cambridge University Press: 354 pp.

  • Gaudet, J. J., 1979. Seasonal changes in nutrients in a tropical swamp: North Swamp, Lake Naivasha, Kenya. J. Ecol. 67: 953–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. M., 1992. The ecological relationships of aquatic plants at Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 232: 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. M., C. Adams & K. M. Mavuti, 1995. The aquatic plant communities of the Lake Naivasha wetland, Kenya: pattern, dynamics and conservation. Wetland Ecol. Manage. 3: 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J., 1990. Greigite and the magnetic properties of sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr, 35: 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. & J. P. Lishman, 1985. The effect of redox changes on the magnetic susceptibility of sediments from a seasonally anoxic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 907–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya Soil Survey, 1982. Exploratory soil map and agro-climatic zone map of Kenya, 1980. Exploratory Soil Survey Report No. E1, Kenya Soil Survey, Nairobi: 56 pp.

  • LNRA, 1999. Lake Naivasha Management Plan. The Lake Naivasha Riparian Association (LNRA), P.O. Box 1011, Naivasha, Kenya: 77 pp.

  • Maher, B. A., 1988. Magnetic properties of some synthetic submicron magnetites. Geophy. J. Royal Astron. Soc. 94: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchiri, S. M. & P. Hickley, 1991. The fishery of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. In Cowx, I. G. (ed.), Catch Effort Sampling Strategies: their Application in Freshwater Fisheries Management. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchiri, S. M., P. Hickley, D. M. Harper & E. North, 1994. The potential for enhancing the fishery of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. In Cowx, I. G. (ed.), Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 348–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, F., B. A. Maher & P. G. Appleby, 1989. Sediment source variations and lead-210 inventories in recent Potomac Estuary sediment cores. J. Quat. Sci. 4: 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., 1999. An introduction to the magnetic properties of natural materials. In Walden, J., F. Oldfield & J. P. Smith (eds), Environmental Magnetism: a Practical Guide. Technical Guide, No. 6, Quaternary Research Association, London: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, I. F., 1994. Bacterial magnetite and the magnetic properties of sediments in a Swedish lake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 126: 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarras-Wahlberg, H., 1998. Investigations of Sediment Geochemistry in Rivers in the Lake Naivasha Catchment. University of Leicester/Earthwatch Institute Report: 11 pp.

  • Tarras-Wahlberg, H., 1999. Investigations of Sediment Stratigraphy and Sediment Geochemistry of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. University of Leicester/Earthwatch Institute Report: 14 pp.

  • Thompson, R. & D. J. Morton, 1979. Magnetic susceptibility and particle-size distributions in recent sediments of the Loch Lomond drainage basin, Scotland. J. Sed. Petrol. 49: 801–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., R. W. Battarbee, P. E. O'sullivan & F. Old-field, 1975. Magnetic susceptibility of lake sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 687–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuren, D., 1999. Sedimentation controls on the preservation and time resolution of sedimentary climate-proxy records from shallow fluctuating lakes. Quaternary Science Reviews 18: 821–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuren, D., C. Cocquyt, J. Tibby, C. N. Roberts & P. R. Leavitt, 1999. Long-term dynamics of algal and invertebrate communities in a small, fluctuating tropical soda lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 1216–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, J., 1999a. Magnetic susceptibility. In Walden, J. F. Old-field & J. P. Smith (eds), Environmental Magnetism: a Practical Guide. Technical Guide, No. 6, Quaternary Research Association, London: 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, J., 1999b. Remanence measurements. In Walden, J., Old-field F. & J. P. Smith (eds), Environmental Magnetism: a Practical Guide. Technical Guide, No. 6, Quaternary Research Association, London: 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R.R. Boar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boar, R., Harper, D.M. Magnetic susceptibilities of lake sediment and soils on the shoreline of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 488, 81–88 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023357910441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023357910441

Navigation