A lack of monotonicity and discontinuity of some integration methods for AUC, as a function of measured concentration, is demonstrated. Hybrid methods consisting of either parabolas-through-the-origin or the α-function method followed by the log-trapezoidal method were found to be discontinuous at the switching point. The stable piecewise third-order polynomial method appeared to be nonmonotonic as well as discontinuous.
W. L. Chiou. Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level-time curve. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.6:539–546 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K. C. Yeh and K. C. Kwan. A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.6:79–98 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. D. Purves. Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC). J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.20:211–226 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K. C. Yeh and R. D. Small. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of stable piecewise cubic polynomials as numerical integration functions. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.17:721–740 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. J. Bailer. Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.16:303–309 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. Heinzl. A note on testing area under the curve when using destructive measurement techniques. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.24:651–655 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar