Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 347–358 | Cite as

First Year Impacts of Casino Gambling in a Community

  • Richard Govoni
  • G. Ron Frisch
  • Nicholas Rupcich
  • Heather Getty

Abstract

Gambling has become both a major pastime for Canadians and a multibillion dollar industry providing provincial governments with an increasing proportion of their annual revenues. The continuing trend toward the legalization of gambling has made research on the public health impacts of gambling increasingly important to citizens and decision-makers. This article presents first year results of a multi-year project to measure the impact of the opening of Casino Windsor on gambling behaviour in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. A random telephone survey of gambling behaviour was conducted with 2,682 adult residents of metropolitan Windsor prior to the opening of Casino Windsor, and was repeated with 2,581 residents one year later. There were no statistically significant changes in the rates of problem and pathological gambling among men, women, or the general population one year following the opening of the casino. Although there was some evidence of higher-spending gamblers within the post-casino sample, no statistically significant differences were found between pre- and post-casino per capita gambling expenditures. Implications of these results for the future measurement and treatment of problem and pathological gambling are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aasved, M. J., Schaefer, J. M., & Merila, K. (1995). Legalized gambling and its impacts in a central Minnesota vacation community: A case study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 137–163.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission (1998). Adult gambling and problem gambling in Alberta. Edmonton: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Baseline Market Research Ltd. (1996). Replication survey of problem gambling in New Brunswick. Report to the New Brunswick Department of Finance. New Brunswick: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Baseline Market Research Ltd. (1996a). Final report: Prevalence study: Problem gambling. Report to the Nova Scotia Department of Health. Halifax: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Canadian Foundation on Compulsive Gambling (1993). Prevalence of problem and pathological gambling in Ontario using the South Oaks Gambling Screen. Toronto: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Criterion Research Corporation (1995). Problem gambling study. Report to the Manitoba Lotteries Foundation. Manitoba: Author.Google Scholar
  8. Commission on the Review of National Policy Toward Gambling (1976). Gambling in America. Final report. Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, M.O., Laundergan, J.C., & Schaefer, J.M. (1994). Adult survey of Minnesota problem gambling behavior: A needs assessment: Changes 1990 to 1994. Report to the Minnesota Department of Human Services. St. Paul: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Ernst & Young (1993). Casino gambling and impacts on pathological or problem gambling: A report to the ministry of consumer and commercial relations. Toronto: Author.Google Scholar
  11. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  12. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1993). Revising the South Oaks Gambling Screen in different settings. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 213–219.Google Scholar
  13. Mark, M. E., & Lesieur, H. R. (1992). A feminist critique of problem gambling research. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 549–565.Google Scholar
  14. National Council of Welfare (1996). Gambling in Canada. Ottawa: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Politzer, R. M., Yesalis, C. E., Hudak, C. J. (1992). The epidemiological model and the risks of legalized gambling: Where are we headed? Health Values, 16, 20–27.Google Scholar
  16. Schaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston: Harvard Medical School Division on Addictions.Google Scholar
  17. Sommers, I. (1988). Pathological gambling: Estimating prevalence and group characteristics. International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 477–490.Google Scholar
  18. Statistics Canada (1992). Profile of census divisions and subdivisions—Part A. Ottawa: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Sudman, S. (1983). Applied sampling. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A.B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 145–194). Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.Google Scholar
  21. Volberg, R. A., & Stuefen, R. M. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in South Dakota. Report to the Governor's Office of South Dakota. Pierre: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Govoni
    • 1
  • G. Ron Frisch
    • 1
  • Nicholas Rupcich
    • 1
  • Heather Getty
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations