Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aquatic pollution assessment based on attached diatom communities in the Pinang River Basin, Malaysia

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diatom communities collected from artificial substrates (glass slides) at 12 sampling sites along Pinang River Basin were analysed. Species composition was highly variable among sampling sites, and the highest diversity value (mean H′ = 3.56 bit/individual) and species richness (mean S = 17.32) was recorded at a polluted station in an estuary, which received salt-water intrusion during high tide. The downstream sampling stations were heavily organically polluted with Saprobic Index values ranging between 2.81 and 3.10, while upstream stations were relatively clean with Saprobic Index values recorded between 1.40 and 1.96. The diatom community structure and the specific sensitivity of certain diatom species can be related to the degree of water quality in Pinang River Basin. The abundance of certain diatom species could be used as biological indicators to measure impacts of river pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloi, J. E., 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 656–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (American Public Health Association), 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination ofWater andWastewater. 18th edn.

  • Archibald, R. E. M., 1972. Diversity in some South African diatom associations and its relation to water quality. Wat. Res. 6: 1229–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A., S. Lang & M. Pomeroy, 1981. Simple methods for sampling periphyton with observations on sampler design criteria. Hydrobiologia 85: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, H. & E. Swale, 1979. An Illustrated Guide to River Phytoplankton. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge: 64 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. J. F. & M. E. Close, 1989. Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flow and nutrients. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J. E., J. H. Zar & C. N. von Ende, 1998. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. 4th Edition. WCB McGraw-Hill, NY: 273 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukhtiyarova, L. & F. E. Round, 1996. Revision of the genus Achnanthes Sensu Lato. Psammothidium, a new genus based on A. marginulatum. Diatom Res. 11(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, V. J. & D. J. Chapman, 1973. The Algae. 2nd edn. The Macmillan Press, NY: 515 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. J., 1988. Microdistributional patterns of freshwater diatoms in relation to their use as bioindicators. 10th Diatom-Symposium 1988: 521–528.

  • Delgado, M., V. N. Jonge, & H. Peletier, 1991. Experiments on resuspension of natural microphytobenthos populations. Mar. Biol. 108: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong, M. D. & M. A. Brusven, 1993. Storage and decomposition of particulate organic matter along the longitudinal gradient of an agriculturally-impacted stream. Hydrobiologia 258: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P., 1979. A new approach to water quality estimation using Diatoms. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 64: 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexiang, J., C. Zhaodi, L. Junmin & L. Shicheng, 1985. Marine Benthic Diatoms in China. China Ocean Press, Beijing: 313 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. & B. Chiswell, 1996. Review of aquatic monitoring program design. Wat. Res. 30(9): 1935–1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE-UM (Department of Environment, Malaysia – University of Malaya), 1994. Development of Water Criteria and Standards – Phase IV (River Classification). Final Report. Vol. II. Main Text. Department of Environment, Malaysia and Institute of Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya.

  • DOE (Department of Environment, Malaysia), 1998. Environmental Management: Water Quality Monitoring – Biomonitoring, Volume 2: Biomonitoring of Sungai Langat: A Case Study. DOE, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment Malaysia, UNDP Project MAL/93/017, 183 pp.

  • DOE (Department of Environment, Malaysia), 1999. Classification of Malaysian Rivers. Volume 9: Pinang River. Draft Final Report: Project On Water Pollution Control: A Study to Classify Rivers in Malaysia (Phase V). (Mansor, M., Eng, L. P., Eng, S. C., Chan, N. W., Rawi, S. M., Rainis, R., Kadir, O. H. & Tan, E. (eds)). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit., S. S., J. P. Smol, J. C. Kingston & D. F. Charles, 1992. Diatoms: powerful indicators of environmental change. Envir. Sci. Tech. 26: 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, G., D. Chapman & A. Beim, 1992. The use of biological materials. In Chapman D. (ed.), Water Quality Assessments. Chapman and Hall, London, UK: 171–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H., A.T. Herlihy, P.R. Kaufmann, R.J. Stevenson, F.H. Mc-Cormick & C. B. Johnson, 2000a. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 19(1): 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H., W. T. Willingham, L. P. Parrish & B. H. McFarland, 2000b. Periphyton community responses to elevated metal concentrations in a Rocky Mountain stream. Hydrobiologia 428: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S.C., 1976. Periphyton production in a tropical lowland stream polluted by inorganic sediments and organic wastes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 77 (4): 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. C. 1979. Structure, species diversity and primary productivity of epiphytic algal communities in the Schöhsee (Holosteen), West Germany. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Max-Plank Institut für Limnologie, Universitat Kiel: 244 pp.

  • Ho, S. C., 1995. Status of limnological Research and training in Malaysia. In Gopal, B. & R. G. Wetzel (eds), Limnology in Developing Countries: 163–189.

  • Ho, S. C. & T. S. Peng, 1997. The use of river plankton and fish in water quality classification of Sg. Perai, Sg. Juru and Sg. Perlis. J. Ensearch. 10(2): 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. G., C. J. Penny & B. A. Whitton, 1995. Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices used to assess river water quality. Hydrobiologia 302: 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapwijk, S. P., T. F. De Boer & M. J. Rijs, 1983. Effects of agricultural wastewater on benthic algae in ditches in the Netherlands. In Wetzel, R. G. (ed.), Periphyton of Freshwater Ecosystems. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague: 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot, H., 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia 64: 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalanobis, P. C., 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc. natn. Inst. Sci. India 2: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F., 1996. Biology of Freshwater Pollution. 3rd edn. Longman Group Limited, UK: 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznah, W. & M. Mansor, 1999. Benthic diatoms in the Pinang River (Malaysia) and its tributaries with emphasis on species diversity and water quality. Int. J. Algae 1(4): 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, P. V. & J. Cairns Jr., 1994. Algae as indicators of environmental change. J. appl. Phycol. 6: 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nather Khan, I.S.A., 1990. Assessment of water pollution using diatom community structure and species distribution-A case study in a tropical river basin. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 75: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nather Khan, I.S.A., 1991. Effect of urban and industrial wastes on species diversity of the diatom community in a tropical river, Malaysia. Hydrobiologia 224: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norhayati, M., 1981. Indices for Water Quality Assessment in a river. M. E. Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok: 221 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantle, R. & H. Buck, 1955. Die biologische Überwaswaschung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas Wasserfach. 96: 604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R., 1973. Use of algae, especially diatoms, in the assessment of water quality. In Cairns, J. Jr. & K. L. Dickson (eds), Biological Methods for the Assessment of Water Quality. Special Technical Publication 528. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R., 1977. Ecology of freshwater diatoms and diatom communities. In Werner, D. (ed.), The Biology of Diatoms. D. Werner (ed.) Blackwell Science, Oxford: 284–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R. & C.W. Reimer, 1966. The Diatoms of the United States. Exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Vol. 1. Monographs of The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

  • Pentecost, A., 1984. Introduction to Freshwater Algae. The Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd., Surrey, England: 246 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J., 1992. Monitoring system. In M. Kovacs, (ed), Biological Indicators in Environmental Protection. Ellis Horwood Series in Environmental Management, Science and Technology: 12–18.

  • Prygiel, J. & M. Coste, 1993. The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, E., 1991. Methodological aspects and perspectives in the use of periphyton for monitoring and protecting rivers. In Whitton, B. A., E. Rott & G. Friedrich (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Proceedings of an International Symposium Studia Studentenförderungs – G.e.s.m.b.H. Innsbruck: 9–16.

  • Rott, E., H. C. Duthie & E. Pipp, 1998. Monitoring organic pollution and eutrophication in the Grand River, Ontario, by means of diatoms. Can. J. Fish. Sci. 55: 1443–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, F.E., 1991. Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. J. appl. Phycol. 3: 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushforth, S. R. & J. T. Brock, 1991. Attached diatom communities from the lower Truckee River, summer and fall, 1986. Hydrobiologia 224: 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater, S., F. Sabater & J. Armengol, 1988. Relationships between diatom assemblages and physico-chemical variables in the River Ter (NE Spain). Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 73(2): 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A., 1996. Panduan Mengenali Alga Air Tawar. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Malaysia: 129 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsudin, L., 1991. Diatom Air Tawar. Morfologi dan Taksonomi. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & W. Weaver, 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL: 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sládeček, V., 1979. Continental systems for the assessment of river water quality. In James, A. & L. Evison (eds), Biological Indicators of Water Quality. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, NY: 3-1-3-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, T., 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. (K. danske. ridensk. selsk. N. S.) 5: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc., 1999. SPSS_ Base 10.0 Application Guide. Copyright© 1999 by SPSS Inc.: 426 pp.

  • St. Clair, L. L. & S. R. Rushforth, 1976. The diatom flora of the Goshen Warm Spring ponds and wet meadow, Gosheh, Utah, USA. Nova Hedwigia 28: 353–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P.M., 1995. Use of algae in aquatic pollution assessment. Nat. Areas J. 15(3): 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P.M., J. T. Butcher & P. J. Gerovac, 1999. Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use. Nat. Areas J. 19: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., 1984. Epilithic and epipelic diatoms in the Sandusky River, with emphasis on species diversity and water Pollution. Hydrobiologia 114: 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. & Y. Pan, 1999. Assessing ecological conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In Stoermer, E. F. & J. P. Smol (eds), The Diatoms: Applications to the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: 11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dam, H., 1982. On the use of measures of structure and diversity in applied diatom ecology. Nova Hedwigia 73: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Maznah, W. O. & M. Mansor, 2000. Periphytic algal composition in Pinang River Basin, a case study on one of the most polluted rivers in Malaysia. J. Biosci. 11 (1 & 2): 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E. B., 1992. Ecological Effects of Wastewater: Applied Limnology and Pollutant Effects. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 424 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. G. & H. C. Duthie, 2000. Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19(1): 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. 1st edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 620 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, Penang, Malaysia

    W. O. Wan Maznah & Mashhor Mansor

Authors
  1. W. O. Wan Maznah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mashhor Mansor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wan Maznah, W.O., Mansor, M. Aquatic pollution assessment based on attached diatom communities in the Pinang River Basin, Malaysia. Hydrobiologia 487, 229–241 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942200740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942200740

Search

Navigation