Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 367–382 | Cite as

Household Headship Among Married Women: The Roles of Economic Power, Education, and Convention

  • Ann E. Biddlecom
  • Ellen A. Kramarow


Household headship historically has been equated with being the main economic provider of the household, a position usually occupied by men. This paper uses a change in the United States Census definition of household headship to examine whether headship for married women is associated with being the primary breadwinner in a marriage versus other non-economic explanations. According to microdata from the 1990 United States Census, women who are the main income providers in a marriage are much more likely to be household heads than women in co-provider marriages. There also is support for an egalitarian ideology explanation; that is, when both spouses are highly educated, the wife is more likely than the husband to be household head net of her relative economic independence in that marriage. Yet the force of convention remains strong given the low prevalence of headship among married women. The new census definition was meant partly to reflect the changing economic status of women. However, the reality is that conventional gender behaviors persist in household headship.

household headship marriage United States Census 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American census: A social history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blee, K. M., & Tickamyer, A. R. (1995). Racial differences in men's attitudes about women's gender roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 21–30.Google Scholar
  3. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.Google Scholar
  4. Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 338–355.Google Scholar
  5. Casper, L. M., Peltola, P. K., & Bianchi, S. M. (1995). A cross-national look at married women's economic dependency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Dechter, A. R., & Smock, P. J. (1994). The fading breadwinner role and the economic implications for young couples. Paper presented at the ISR Family Studies Seminar series at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  7. Folbre, N., & Abel, M. (1989). Women's work and women's households: Gender bias in the U.S. Census. Social Research, 56, 545–569.Google Scholar
  8. Goldscheider, F. K., & Goldscheider, C. (Eds.). (1989). Ethnicity and the new family economy: Living arrangements and intergenerational financial flows. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  11. Petersen, W. (1987). Politics and the measurement of ethnicity. In W. Alonso & P. Starr (Eds.), The politics of numbers (pp. 187–233). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Ruggles, S. (1991). Comparability of the public use files of the U.S. Census of Population, 1880–1980. Social Science History, 15, 123–158.Google Scholar
  13. Santi, L. L. (1990). Household headship among unmarried persons in the United States, 1970–1985. Demography, 27(2), 219–232.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, D. S. (1992). The meanings of family and household: Change and continuity in the mirror of the American census. Population and Development Review, 18, 421–456.Google Scholar
  15. Sorensen, A., & McLanahan, S. (1987). Married women's economic dependency, 1940–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 659–687.Google Scholar
  16. Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1987). American families and households. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Treas, J. (1993). Money in the bank: Transaction costs and the economic organization of marriage. American Sociological Review, 58, 723–734.Google Scholar
  18. Tucker, M. B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1990). New trends in Black American interracial marriage: The social structural context. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 209–218.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1982). 1980 census of population and housing users' guide. Part A. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). 1990 census of population social and economic characteristics: United States. (1990 CP-2-1). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1997). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1997 (117th edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann E. Biddlecom
    • 1
  • Ellen A. Kramarow
    • 2
  1. 1.Population CouncilNew YorkUnited States
  2. 2.National Center for Health StatisticsHyattsvilleUnited States

Personalised recommendations