Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 219–220 | Cite as

Commentary: Bebko, Perry, and Bryson on Mostert (2001), “Facilitated Communication Since 1995”

  • James M. Bebko
  • Adrienne Perry
  • Susan Bryson
Commentary
  • 78 Downloads

REFERENCES

  1. Bebko, J. M., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. E. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 19–42.Google Scholar
  2. Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Perry, A., Bryson, S., & Bebko, J. (1993). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: Preliminary group results. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 2, 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Perry, A., Bebko, J., & Bryson, S. (1994). Validity of facilitated communication: Failure to replicate Calculator & Singer (1992). Topics in Language Disorders, 14, 79–82.Google Scholar
  5. Perry, A., Bryson, S., & Bebko, J. (1998). Degree of facilitator influence as a function of facilitator characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 87–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schopler, E. (1996). Editorial Preface. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 7–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Bebko
    • 1
  • Adrienne Perry
    • 2
  • Susan Bryson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Thistletown Regional CentreTRE-ADDTorontoCanada
  3. 3.IWK Health CentreHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations