Skip to main content
Log in

Families of Homicide Victims: Service Utilization Patterns of Extra- and Intrafamilial Homicide Survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Homicides precipitate numerous problems for victims' families that can be eased, in part, by counseling, case management, and court advocacy services. Guided by a crisis theory framework, the records of 112 homicide victims' family members (or “survivors”) served by a public victims assistance agency were examined to discern typical service utilization patterns and differences for survivors of intrafamilial homicides (i.e., cases in which the perpetrator was a family member of the victim). Results indicated that survivors of intrafamilial homicides utilized services during the initial 8-week crisis period following the homicide more than other survivors, yet used services less during the subsequent 8-week period. The findings substantiated the application of crisis theory to studying the experiences of survivors and underscored the importance of considering survivors' familial relationships to perpetrators in the provision of services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvidrez, J. (1999). Ethnic variations in mental health attitudes and service use among low-income African American, Latina, and European American young women. Commun. Mental Health J. 35: 515-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegel, D., Petchers, M., and Snyder, A. (1989). Unmet needs and barriers to service delivery for the blind and visually impaired elderly. The Gerontologist 29: 86-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1991). Counseling Victims of Violence, American Association for Counseling and Development, Alexandria, VI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. (1975). Family reaction to homicide. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 45: 391-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, S., and Allen-Meares, P. (1994). Neglected victims of murder: Children's witness to parental homicide. Soc. Work 39(1): 28-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calsyn, R., and Roades, L. (1993). Predicting perceived service need, service awareness, and service utilization. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 21(1/2): 59-76

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, B. (1982). Survivors of homicide: The unseen victims. In Danto, B., Bruhs, J., and Kutscher A. (Eds.), The Human Side of Homicide Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 85-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L., Shaffer, D., and Smith, H. (1996). Neglected victims of homicide: The needs of young siblings of murder victims. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 66: 337-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzel, G. (1988). Violence, social work, and groups: An overview. Soc. Work Groups 11(3): 3-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzel, G., and Masters, R. (1983). Group work with parents of homicide victims. Soc. Work Groups 6(2): 81-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzel, G., and Masters, R. (1984). Serving families who survive homicide victims. Soc. Casework 65: 138-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan, E. (1986). Crisis theory. In Turner, E. (ed.), Social Work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Perspectives, 3rd. edn., Hasworth, New York, pp. 296-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, P., Bruce, M., and Tischer, G. (1986). The differential effect of attitudes on the use of mental health services. Soc. Psychiatry 21: 187-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmann, E. (1944). Symptomatology and management of acute grief. Am. J. Psychiatry 101 (Sept.): 141-148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, E., Moore, N., and Lexius, C. (1992). Group work with families of homicide victims. Soc. Work Groups 15(1): 19-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, D. (1983). What Murder Leaves Behind: The Victim's Family, Dodd, Mead, & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R., Friedman, L., and Getzel, G. (1988). Helping families of homicide victims: A multidimensional approach. J. Trauma. Stress 1: 109-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., Moore, N., and Lexius, C. (1985). A group for families of homicide victims: An evaluation. Soc. Case. 66: 432-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors, H., and Taylor, R. (1985). The use of social service agencies by Black Americans. Soc. Serv. Rev. 59: 258-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprang, M., McNeil, J., and Wright, R. (1989). Psychological changes after the murder of a significant other. Soc. Case. 70: 159-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, A., Sullivan, V., and Loew, R. (1998). Cultural and linguistic barriers to mental health service access: The deaf consumer's perspective. Am. J. Psychiatry 155: 982-984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickler, M., and Allgeyer, J. (1967). The crisis group: A new application of crisis theory. Soc. Work 12 (July): 28-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J., and Levy, A. (1996). Communities under fire: Empowering families and children in the aftermath of homicide. Clin. Soc. Work J. 24: 403-414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horne, C. Families of Homicide Victims: Service Utilization Patterns of Extra- and Intrafamilial Homicide Survivors. Journal of Family Violence 18, 75–82 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022831530134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022831530134

Navigation