Skip to main content
Log in

Web-Based Portfolios: A Vehicle for Examining Prospective Elementary Teachers' Developing Understandings of Teaching Science

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abell, S.K., & Bryan, L.A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S.K., Bryan, L.A., & Anderson, M.A. (1998). Investigating prospective elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschermann, J.R. (1999). Electronic portfolios: Why? What? How? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.

  • Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2002, April). Exploring the Influence of Web-Based Portfolio Development on Learning to Teach Elementary Science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

  • Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2001). Web-based philosophies: Making prospective elementary teachers' personal theorizing visible. Science Education International 12, 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. (1998). Strategic questions: What to consider when planning for electronic portfolios. Learning and Teaching with Technology, 26, 6-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher's portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Handbook of teacher evaluation: Elementary and secondary personnel, 293-345. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, L.A., Zembal-Saul, C. Frazier, M. & Appel, H. (1999, January). Enhancing the science in elementary science methods: A collaborative effort between science education and entomology. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.

  • Borko, H., Livingston, C., McCaleb, J., & Mauro, L. (1988). Student teachers' planning and post-lesson reflections: Patterns and implications for teacher education. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers' Professional Learning. New York: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. & Chignell, M.H. (1993). Learning by linking: Pedagogical environments for hypermedia authoring. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 5, 27-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 5, 43-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1992). Portfolios for science education: Purpose, design, and authenticity. Science Education, 76, 451-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, T. & Tippins, D. (1998). Portfolios, reflection and educating prospective teachers of science. In B.J. Fraser and K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, 719-732. Great Britain: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S.J. (1990, April). Flexible cognitive tools for problem-solving instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollase, R.H. (1996). The Vermont experience in state-mandated portfolio approval. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 85-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducharme, E.R. & Ducharme, M.K. (1996). Reflecting on reflecting. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 83-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 255-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidus, H. (1998). Mentoring portfolio development. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism, 51-68. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, G.E., & McKenzie, W.L. (1999). The development of a multi-media portfolio for enhancing learning and assessment in a K-8 science methods class. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 335-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J.M., & Zeichner, K.M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in prospective teacher education: A case from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 119-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.E. & Huebner, T.A. (1998). The portfolio question: The power of self-directed inquiry. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism, 156-171. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F., Slattery, M., Baird, J.R., & Northfield, J. R. (1993). A case study exploration of development in prospective science teachers. Science Education, 77, 47-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, L. (2001). Engaging in science inquiry: Prospective teachers' learning in the context of an innovative life science course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Haefner, L. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2001). Engaging in science as inquiry: Prospective elementary teachers' learning in the context of an innovative life science course. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

  • Jonassen, D. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6, 40-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S. (1996), Portfolios in teacher education: Effects of instruction on prospective teachers' early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 130-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D. & Sherwood, R. (1997). Hypermedia in science and mathematics: Applications in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 249-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V.K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of prospective teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1998). Introduction. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism, 1-8. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. (1998). Preservice teachers' electronic portfolios: Integrating technology, self-assessment, and reflection. Teacher Education Quarterly, 23, 85-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milman, N. (1999). Web-based electronic teaching portfolios for preservice teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.

  • Morris, J. & Buckland, H. (2000). Electronic portfolios for learning and assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.

  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicaise, M. & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 205-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donoghue, T.A. & Brooker, R. (1996). The rhetoric and reality of the promotion of reflection during practice teaching: An Australian case study. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 99-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, M.E., & Rapp, M. (2001). Implementing web-based portfolio assessment in a graduate instructional technology program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando, FL.

  • Russell, T. & Munby, H. (Eds.) (1992). Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J.J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J.J. Schwab & P.F. Brandwein, The teaching of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism, 23-38. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. (1988). AI in reverse: Computer tools that turn cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 123-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitulnik, M.W., Zembal-Saul, C. & Krajcik, J.S. (1998). Using hypermedia to represent emerging student understanding: Science learners and prospective teachers. In J.J. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee and J.D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stofflett, R. T. & Stefanon, L. (1996). Elementary teacher candidates' conceptions of successful conceptual change teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, J.H.C. (1996). A knowledge base for mentors of beginning teachers: A Dutch perspective. In R. McBride (Ed.), Teacher education policy: Some issues arising from research and practice, 113-134. Washington, DC: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. (1996). World Wide Web authoring in the portfolio-assessed, (inter)networked composition course. Computers and Composition, 13, 219-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.S. (1990). Prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about teaching: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 279-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf (1991). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 129-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C. (1998, April). Incorporating hypermedia artifact development into a science methods course for prospective elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P. & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C. (2001, April). Web-based portfolios in a professional development school context. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.

  • Zembal-Saul, C. & Dana, T. (2001, March). Argument and evidence in webbased teaching portfolios. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technologies in Teacher Education (SITE), Orlando, FL.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zembal-Saul, C., Haefner, L.A., Avraamidou, L. et al. Web-Based Portfolios: A Vehicle for Examining Prospective Elementary Teachers' Developing Understandings of Teaching Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education 13, 283–302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022583432710

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022583432710

Keywords

Navigation