Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Letter to the Editor: Low Test-Retest Reliability Does Not Diminish the Value of Penile Self-Measurement

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., & Hershberger, S. (1999). The relation between sex-ual orientation and penile size. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 213–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R., & Golombok, S. E. (2002). Test-retest reliability of the measurement of penile dimensions in a sample of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 351–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, S. L., Plomin, R., & Pedersen, N. L. (1995). Traits and metatraits: Their reliability, stability and shared genetic influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 673–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, California, 90802

    Scott L. Hershberger

Authors
  1. Scott L. Hershberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hershberger, S.L. Letter to the Editor: Low Test-Retest Reliability Does Not Diminish the Value of Penile Self-Measurement. Arch Sex Behav 32, 91–92 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022491322904

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022491322904

Keywords

Search

Navigation