Abstract
Information on bryophyte diversity and rarity were combined withinformation on soil conditions and land use for Walloon Brabant (centralBelgium, 1091 km2) in order to investigate whichlandscape features sustain the most rare and diverse species assemblages.Presence–absence of 325 bryophyte species was recorded in 87 grid-squaresof 4 × 4 km. Species diversity was significantly correlatedwith forest cover (r = 0.71, P <0.001), sandy soils (r = 0.61, P <0.001), loamy soils, (r = −0.68,P < 0.001), and agricultural fields(r = −0.49, P < 0.001). Themost diverse grid-squares possessed up to 182 species and were characterized byat least 10% forest cover and the presence of unique micro-habitats.Grid-squares with forest cover reaching at least 10% but lacking uniquemicro-habitats contained between 90 and 130 species. Below 10% forest cover,diversity ranged between 55 and 110 species per grid-square. However, even theleast diverse cultivated areas included a significant amount of the regionallyrare species. A number of the latter are characteristic in other areas forspecific primary habitats lacking in Walloon Brabant but display an unexpectedability to disperse throughout hostile areas and colonize secondary habitats.The tendency of such species to occur in man-made habitats decreased our abilityto predict species richness and rarity from landscape features and soilconditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates J.W. 1995. A bryophyte flora of Berkshire. Journal of Bryology 18: 503–620.
Bergamini A., Peintinger M., Schmid B. and Urmi E. 2001. Effects of management and altitude on bryophyte species diversity and composition in montane calcareous fens. Flora 196: 180–193.
Bisang I. 1998. The occurrence of hornwort populations (Anthocerotales, Anthoceropsida) in the Swiss plateau: the role of management, weather conditions and soil characteristics. Lindbergia 23: 94–104.
Bisang I., Geissler P., Muller N., Schnyder N., Schüliger-Bossard C. and Urmi E. 1998. Distribution of bryophytes in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Botanica Helvetica 108: 197–216.
Bojorqueztaquia L.A., Azvara I., Ezcurra E. and Floresvillela J. 1995. Identifying conservation priorities in Mexico through geographic information system and modelling. Ecological Applications 5: 215–231.
Cleavitt N. 2001. Disentangling moss species limitations: the role of physiologically based substrate specificity for six species occurring on substrates with varying pH and percent organic matter. The Bryologist 104: 59–68.
Cowley M.J.R., Wilson R.J., Leon-Cortes J.L., Guttierez D., Bulman C.R. and Thomas C.D. 2000. Habitat-based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 60–72.
Cox J.E. and Larson D.W. 1993. Environmental relations of the bryophytic and vascular components of a talus slope plant community. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 553–560.
Dierssen K. 2001. Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological classification of European bryophytes. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 56: 1–289.
European Committee for the Conservation of Bryophytes 1995. Red Data Book of European Bryophytes. ECCB, Trondheim, Norway.
Fensham R.J. and Streimann H. 1997. Broad landscape relations of the moss flora from inland dry rainforest in north Queensland, Australia. The Bryologist 100: 56–64.
Hallingbäck T. and Hodgetts N. (eds) 2000. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Bryophytes. Mosses, Liverworts, and Hornworts. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Hebrard J.P. and Loisel R. 1994. Search for factors maintaining terricolous bryoflora richness in isolated habitats. 2. Comparison between the sclerophyllous oak groves of the occidental border of the Massif des Maures (Var, France) and their interfaces with the vineyard. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 18: 243–271.
Hebrard J.P. and Loisel R. 2001. Search for factors responsible for maintaining the rich bryoflore in terricole isolated habitats. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 22: 199–216.
Hedenäs L. and Soderström L. (eds) 1992. Endangered bryophytes in Europe – causes and conservation. Biological Conservation 59: 85–283.
Jonsson B.G. and Esseen P.A. 1990. Treefall disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in a boreal spruce forest. Journal of Ecology 78: 924–936.
Kautz T. and Gradstein S.R. 2001. On the ecology and conservation of Spruceanthus theobromae (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae) from western Ecuador. The Bryologist 104: 607–612.
Lampolahti J. and Syrjaven K. 1992. A survey of rare and threatened bryophytes in southwestern Finland. Biological Conservation 59: 197–200.
Lenton S.M., Fa J.E. and Del Val J.P. 2000. A simple non-parametric GIS model for predicting species distribution: endemic birds in Bioko Island,West Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 869–885.
Maréchal R. and Tavernier R. 1970. Associations de sols, planchette 11 b. Atlas de Belgique. Comité National de Géographie, Brussels, Belgium.
O'Brien E.M. 1998.Water-energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness: a general model. Journal of Biogeography 25: 379–398.
Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Binns D. 1999. Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conservation Biology 13: 282–292.
Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Pressey R.L. 2000. Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens. Biological Conservation 96: 371–378.
Prendergast J.R. 1997. Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20: 210–216.
Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hot-spots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.
Rambo T.R. 2001. Decaying logs and habitat heterogeneity: implications for bryophyte diversity in western Oregon forests. Northwest Science 75: 270–279.
Sabovljevic M., Ganeva A., Tsakiri E. and Stefanut S. 2001. Bryology and bryophyte protection in south-eastern Europe. Biological Conservation 101: 73–84.
Schumacker R. (ed.) 1985. Atlas de distribution des bryophytes de Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg et des régions limitrophes. I. Anthocerotae et Hepaticae. Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Meise, Belgium.
Sotiaux A. and Sotiaux O. 1998. Distribution de Distichium capillaceum (Ditrichaceae, Musci) en Belgique et dans les régions limitrophes. Dumortiera 69: 24–28.
Sotiaux A. and Vanderpoorten A. 2001a. Atlas bryologique du Brabant wallon (Belgique). Lejeunia 167: 1–77.
Sotiaux A. and Vanderpoorten A. 2001b. Check-list of the bryophytes of Belgium. Belgian Journal of Botany 134: 97–120.
Swindel B.F., Smith J.E. and Abt R.C. 1991. Methodology for predicting species diversity in managed forests. Forest Ecology and Management 40: 75–85.
Tan B.C. and Pocs T. 2000. Bryogeography and conservation of bryophytes. In: Shaw A.J. and Goffinet B. (eds), Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 403–448.
Vanden Berghen C. 1985. La végétation adventice des moissons aux environs de Bruxelles. Les Naturalistes Belges 66: 17–20.
Vanderpoorten A. and Engels P. 2002. The effects of environmental variation on bryophytes at a regional scale. Ecography 25: 513–522.
Vitt D.H. and Belland R.J. 1997. Attributes of rarity among Alberta mosses: patterns and prediction of species diversity. The Bryologist 100: 1–12.
Walphot-Cicade, 1993. Plan d'Occupation des Sols deWallonie, 1/50000. Final report. Namur, Belgium.
Zechmeister H.G. and Moser R. 2001. The influence of agricultural land-use intensity on bryophyte species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1609–1625.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderpoorten, A., Engels, P. Patterns of bryophyte diversity and rarity at a regional scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 545–553 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022476902547
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022476902547