Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation by Mössbauer Spectroscopy of the Forms of Iron in Sulfide-Rich Fulvic Acid Solutions

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variations in the nature of the bonding between iron and fulvic acid as a function of pH in sulfide-rich solutions have been investigated by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. In all solutions iron was enriched to 95% in the 57Fe isotope and ratios of Fe : fulvic acid were maintained at 1 : 100 on a weight basis for all measurements. When the pH was decreased below 5.0, there was a progressive change in the composition of the spectra, which contained three distinct components that were similar to those seen in the absence of sulfide; i.e., a sextet from magnetically-dilute Fe(III) and doublets from Fe(II) and Fe(III). There was, however, a higher proportion of the iron as Fe(II) in the sulfide-containing solutions and this represented the only form of iron at very low pH. Establishment of equilibria was slow as evidenced by considerable hysteresis between the compositions of the solutions with decreasing and increasing pHs. On increasing the pH, sulfide prevented the formation of magnetically dilute Fe(III) species and instead, in the range 3.5–6.0, compounds were generated with parameters consistent with sulfur being coordinated to the iron. One had parameters similar to those of pyrite and hence probably contains disulfide (S2 2−) units, whilst a second, with poorly defined magnetic hyperfine splitting, may contain monosulfide (S2−) units, with structures related to either pyrrhotite (Fe1−x S) or greigite (Fe3S4). A third component probably corresponds to a mononuclear low spin Fe(II) complex, involving sulfur and fulvic acid in the iron coordination sphere. These species were oxygen-sensitive and decomposed to yield magnetically dilute Fe(III) complexes and Fe(III) oxyhydroxides on aeration of the solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freney, J. R. and Williams, C. H., In: M. V. Ivanov and J. R. Freney (eds), The Global Biogeochemical Sulphur Cycle, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment SCOPE 19, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1983, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luther, III, G. W., Kostka, J. E., Church, T. M., Sulzberger, B. and Stumm, W., Marine Chemistry 40 (1992), 81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman, B. A., Cheshire, M. V. and Chadwick, J., J. Soil Sci. 42 (1991), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloomfield, C. and Coulter, J. K., Adv. Agron. 25 (1973), 265.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson, F. J. and Fitch, A., In: P. M. Huang and M. Schnitzer (eds), Interaction of SoilMinerals with Natural Organics and Microbes, Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 17, 1986, p. 29.

  6. Brown, K. A., Soil Biol. Biochem. 17 (1985), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morse, J. W., Millero, F. J., Cornwell, J. C. and Rickard, D., Earth Sci. Rev. 24 (1987), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman, B. A. and Cheshire, M. V., Sci. Total Environ. 62 (1987), 229.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glentworth, R. and Muir, J. W., The Soils of the Country round Aberdeen, Inverurie and Fraserburgh, Memoirs of the Soil Survey of Scotland, HMSO, Edinburgh, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stevens, J. G., Pollak, H., Zhe, L., Stevens, V. E., White, R.M. and Gigson, J. L., Mineral Data Handbook, Mössbauer Effect Data Center, University of North Carolina, 1983.

  11. Huggins, F. E. and Huffman, G. G., In: Analytical Methods for Coal and Coal Products, Vol. III, Academic Press, 1979, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morra, M. J., Fendorf, S. E. and Brown, P. D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61 (1997), 683.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farina, M., Esquivel, D. M. S. and Lins De Barros, G. P., Nature 343 (1990), 256.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mann, S., Sparks, N. H. C., Frankel, R. B., Bazylinski, D. A. and Jannasch, H. W., Nature 343 (1990), 258.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Staniek, H., Fassbinder, J. W. E., Vali, Wägele, H. and Graf, W., Europ. J. Soil Sci. 45 (1994), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rickard, D. T., Stockholm Contrib. Geol. 20 (1969), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vaughan, D. J. and Ridout, M. S., J. Inorg. Nuclear Chem. 33 (1971), 741.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berner, R. A., Amer. J. Sci. 268 (1970), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howarth, R. W., Science 203 (1979), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swider, K. T. and Mackin, J. E., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53 (1989), 2311.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coey, J. M. D., Spender, M. R. and Morrish, A. H., Solid State Commun. 8 (1970), 1605.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kostka, J. E. and Luther, III, G. W., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58 (1994), 1701.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, B.A., Cheshire , M.V. Characterisation by Mössbauer Spectroscopy of the Forms of Iron in Sulfide-Rich Fulvic Acid Solutions. Hyperfine Interactions 141, 549–558 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022415731470

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022415731470

Navigation