Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 93, Issue 5, pp 880–886 | Cite as

Drawbacks of the Classical Theory of the α-Rossi Method and Its Alternative

  • A. G. Shokod'ko
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Certain contradictions and inaccuracies in the classical theory of the α-Rossi stochastic neutron method are pointed out. An alternative theory which is almost free of contradictions and deficiencies of the classical theory is presented.

A new implementation regime for the method is proposed to eliminate any influence of the prestart dip on the correlated amplitude in the α-Rossi method using modern time-delay analyzers – the scaled start regime, consisting in triggerings of the time-delay analyzer scaled by two, three, or more signals from the starting neutron detector. It is shown that the correlated amplitude contains the ratio of the first and second moments of the number of prompt neutrons in a chain.

A new expression is obtained for taking account of the spatial-energy effect in the α-Rossi method. The effect differs from the well-known one not only by the energy component but also by a large range of possible values.

The possibilities of the α-Rossi method for determining the physical parameters of multiplying and nonmultiplying media are considered: α, kp, k, βeff, F, Fs, and D.

Keywords

Physical Parameter Large Range Classical Theory Alternative Theory Energy Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    R. Feyman, F. Hoffmann, and R. Serber, “Dispersion of the neutron emission in U-235 fission,” J. Nucl. Energy, 3, 64–69 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Orndoff, “Prompt neutron periods of metal assemblies,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 2, 450–460 (1957).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. G. Zolotukhin and A. I. Mogil'ner, “On the distribution of the number of counts of a neutron detector placed in a reactor,” At. Énerg., 15, No. 1, 11–15 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Babala, “Point-reactor theory of Rossi-α experiment,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 28, 237–242 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Iijima, “Basic studies on Rossi-α experiment the correlation amplitude,” J. Nucl. Sci. Tech., No. 12, 624–628 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Kipin, Physical Principles of the Kinetics of Nuclear Reactors [Russian translation], Atomizdat, Moscow (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. I. Mogil'ner, “Stochastic kinetics of nuclear reactors,” in: Pulsed and Statistical Methods for Studying Reactors, Obninsk (1969), Vol. 1, 362–447.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Dulin and G. M. Mikhailov, “Measurement of the effective fraction of delayed neutrons by the α-Rossi method,” At. Énerg., 78, No. 3, 151–155 (1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. F. Efimenko, V. K. Mozhaev, and V. A. Dulin, “Use of a fission chamber with a 252Cf layer in certain physical measurements,” At. Énerg., 39, No. 1, 54–56 (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. G. Shokod'ko, É. A. Stumbur, V. G. Kulebyakin, and V. M. Sluchevskaya, “Spontaneous neutron bursts as a source for determining the reactivity by the Shestrand pulse method,” Preprint FÉI-824 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    É. A. Strumbur, I. P. Matveenko, and A. G. Shokod'ko, “Integrated pulsed methods for measuring reactivity,” in: Theoretical and Experimental Problems of Nonstationary Neutron Transport, Atomizdat, Moscow (1972), pp. 245–267.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. G. Shokod'ko, “Exact equation for the kinetics of a nuclear reactor,” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh. Ser. Fiz. Tekh. Yad. Reakt., No. 4, 3–9 (1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Otsuka and T. Iijima, “Space-dependent formula for Rossi-α measurements,” Nukleonik., 7, 488–493 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Dragt, Reactor Centrum Nederland, Petten, RCN-101 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Shokod'ko
    • 1
  1. 1.State Science Center of the Russian Federation – A. I. Leipunskii Physics and Power Engineering InstituteRussia

Personalised recommendations