Skip to main content
Log in

Policies Promoting Innovation in Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S. and U.K.

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We provide background information on U.S. and U.K. policies promoting innovation in small firms and also summarize the papers that appear in this special issue. These studies were presented at a recent workshop that was jointly organized by the University of Nottingham Institute for Enterprise and Innovation (UNIEI) and the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Based on a synthesis of these papers and other evidence that was presented during the workshop, we conclude that: (1) program evaluation is much more prevalent in the U.S. than in the U.K.; (2) the U.S. Advanced Technology Program (ATP) and Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program have been successful; and (3) shared costs between government and industry and frequent assessment are the keys to ensuring that such programs are successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 1999, The AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 1998.

  • Acs, Zoltan and David B. Audretsch, 1988, 'Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis', American Economic Review 78, 678-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin, 1990, 'Universities as Engines of R&D-Based Economic Growth: They Think They Can', Research Policy 19, 335-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin, 1997, 'Technology Transfer from Universities', in John C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume XII, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Stephen J., Mike Wright and Andy Lockett, 2001, 'Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 127-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., Albert N. Link and John T. Scott, 2001, 'Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 87-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N., 1996, Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development, New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and John T. Scott, 1998, Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Stephen and John T. Scott, 2000, 'The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation', Research Policy 29, 437-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, David C., Richard R. Nelson, Bhaven Sampat and Arvids A. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. University Research and Technology Transfer: An Analysis of Data from Columbia University, the University of California, and Stanford University', Research Policy 30(1), 99-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., 2001, 'Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 13-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter. W. and Jason Owen-Smith, 1998, 'Universities and the Market for Intellectual Property in the Life Sciences', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17, 253-2777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Donald S., 2000, 'Strategic Research Partnerships and Economic Performance: Data Considerations', Paper Presented at the National Science Foundation Workshop on Strategic Research Partnerships, Arlington, VA, October 13, 2000.

  • Siegel, Donald S., Jerry G. Thursby, Marie C. Thursby and Arvids A. Ziedonis, 2001, 'Organizational Issues in University-Industry Technology Transfer: An Overview of the Symposium Issue', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 5-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Donald, David Waldman and Albert N. Link, 1999, 'Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study', NBER Working Paper #7256, July 1999.

  • Thursby, Jerry G., Richard Jensen and Marie C. Thursby, 2000, 'Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 59-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessner, Charles W. (ed.), 1999, The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessner, Charles W. (ed.), 2000, The Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR): An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, D.S., Wessner, C., Binks, M. et al. Policies Promoting Innovation in Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S. and U.K.. Small Business Economics 20, 121–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022271914246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022271914246

Keywords

Navigation