Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 105–121 | Cite as

Public Policy and the Displacement Effects of Casinos: A Case Study of Riverboat Gambling in Missouri

  • Donald Siegel
  • Gary Anders


A critical issue in assessing the economic impact of casinos is whether gambling activity displaces consumer expenditure from conventional retail establishments. We test this hypothesis using industry-level, time series data for eleven counties in Missouri, a state that recently introduced riverboats. Our results are generally inconsistent with the displacement hypothesis. However, we do find evidence of substitution between gambling and other businesses in the entertainment and amusement sector. This conclusion lends credence to the view that gaming serves as a substitute for other forms of entertainment. Our results also imply that the search for displacement should probably be focused on activities that constitute the closest consumer substitutes. We conclude with a discussion of the policy implications for state regulation of this new source of revenue.


Time Series Public Policy Series Data Economic Impact Critical Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anders, G. C. (1998). Indian gaming: Financial and regulatory issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 98–108.Google Scholar
  2. Anders, G., Siegel, D. and Yacoub, M. (1998). Does Indian casino gambling reduce state revenues?: Evidence from Arizona, Contemporary Economic Policy, 16(2),1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. and Navin, J. (1996). Riverboat gaming: an analysis of future odds. Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, June 28–July 2.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, S. 1995. The birth of a new industry: Casinos in the coastal Mississippi. The Journal of Business Forecasting, Fall 14(3), 7–10.Google Scholar
  5. Eadington, W. and Cornelius, J. (Eds., 1997). Gaming: public policies and the social sciences. Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  6. Eadington, W. (1995). Economic development and the introduction of casinos: myths and realities. Economic Development Review, 13(4), 51–54.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, M. K. (1996). A study of the economic impact of the gaming industry through the year 2005. unpublished study, The Evans Group.Google Scholar
  8. International Gaming and Wagering Business, (August 1996). 17(8).Google Scholar
  9. Gazel, R. (1998). The economic impacts of casino gambling at the state and local levels. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 66–84.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, R. (1995). Legalized gambling: public policy and economic development issues. Economic Development Review, 13(4), 55–57.Google Scholar
  11. Grinols, E. (1996). Incentives explain gambling's growth. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 11(2), 118–124.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, K. and Blevins, A. (1995). Gambling on the lure of historic preservation: community transformation in rocky mountain mining towns. Journal of the Community Development Society, 26(1), 71–92.Google Scholar
  13. Jinkner-Lloyd, A. (1996). Gambling on economic development. American City & County, 111(8), 57–64.Google Scholar
  14. Kindt, J. W. (1994). The economic impacts of legalized gambling activities. Drake Law Review, 43(1), 51–95.Google Scholar
  15. Larson, M. (1995). Gaming industry development: a comparison of three states. Economic Development Review, 13(4), 4–8.Google Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. (1998). Costs and treatment of pathological gambling. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 153–171.Google Scholar
  17. Madhusudhan, R. G. (1996). Betting on Casino Revenues: Lessons from State Experiences. National Tax Journal 34(3), 401–412.Google Scholar
  18. Marfels, C. (1995). Is bigness better in casino gaming? Evidence from the Atlantic City market. Gaming Research & Review Journal, 2(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Missouri Gaming Commission. (1996). Annual Report to the General Assembly.Google Scholar
  20. Missouri Gaming Commission. (1997). Annual Summary of Riverboat Gaming Activity.Google Scholar
  21. Mullally, Kevin P. Deputy Director, Missouri Gaming Commission, (March 18, 1998). Telephone interview.Google Scholar
  22. Nichols, M. W. (1998). Deregulation and Cross-Border Substitution in Iowa's Riverboat Gambling Industry. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 151–172.Google Scholar
  23. Szakmary, A. C. And Szakmary C. M. (1995). State lotteries as a source of revenue: A re-examination. Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 1167–1181.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, W. N. and Gazel, R. (1996). The monetary impacts of riverboat casino gambling in Illinois. A study for the better government association. Chicago: Better Government Association.Google Scholar
  25. Truitt, L. J. (1996). Casino gambling in Illinois: riverboats, revenues, and economic development. Journal of Travel Research 34(3), 89–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Siegel
    • 1
  • Gary Anders
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NottinghamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.School of ManagementArizona State University WestPhoenix

Personalised recommendations